this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
384 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

8859 readers
1628 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In 10 years there will be European countries all over the world.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's a nice idea but the EU needs to do a treaty reform to do that. There'll also be a major issue with integrating since Canada is a part of NAFTA and will have to potentially produce labels and hold standards of both. There are probably some regulations that contradict each other somewhere.

[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Seems like the current US government is trying to rip that agreement right up

[–] engene@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

I’m all for closer ties with the EU but it doesn’t make sense to join the union due to simple geography.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

It's not that far, it looks further on the map due to the map projection. A flight takes 6-7 hours from Ottowa to the UK and with the opening of the Bearing Strait sea lane it'll become feasible to ship non-perishable goods from Canada to EU and back from both sides of the Canada.

[–] orhtej2@eviltoast.org 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Eurovision Song Contest laughs at your petti geography. map of Eurovision Song Contest contestants

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Vatican City: could participate but does not.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

The criteria as set out in the treaties is to be "a European country", what "European" means has been deliberately left open. Geography is at best a secondary factor.

[–] arankays@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

If they can get some kind of special status like the UK had it would make sense, simply because there's no tariffs inside EU borders and free travel and probably some other stuff.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Being a member of the European Economic Area is a more realistic goal and would probably solve Canada's problems derived from being far too Economically entwinned with their next door neighbour.

Mind you, any form of being part of the EU Single Market (which EEA members are without being EU members) requires a ton of uniformization of things like Product regulations (which amongst other things means Canada would not be allowed to import many if not most US food products such as for example beef of cattle which has been fed hormones) and acceptance of Freedom Of Movement for both people and goods.

(Following Brexit, Britain did not move to become an EEA member exactly because of both the Freedom of Movement requirement and the difficulty in getting other EEA member approval since the UK are a disproportionatelly large economy compared to all EEA members but Canada's reasons are different - not anti-immigration and xenophobia like the UK - so things like Freedom Of Movement would probably not be an issue and its Economy is just a bit over half the size of the UK's)

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

I think EU membership is a huge stretch, but we could certainly move in the direction of harmonizing with EU trade regulations. A good medium-term goal might be to join the Schengen trade zone, and then move on from there.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago

I'm not a fan of actions taken in haste but diversifying trading opportunities and providing mutual security really could be beneficial.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Surprised I had to scroll all the way down here to find it. Was everyone else having a discussion only based on the headline?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 88 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Capitalists are gonna have a meltdown when we'll have to implement the 4 weeks minimum paid vacation, banked overtime with a yearly limit, bretter minimum wage, tougher regulations on food and environment protection. Etc.

[–] Comtief@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

What do you mean what?

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I would support stronger ties to Canada, but Canada is not exactly in Europe

[–] TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Canada does share a land boarder with Denmark.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Two! Both sea and land borders with France. Don't forget Vimy Ridge!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vapourisation@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if we just take Canada and move it over a little?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Why would that matter? It's a political and economical union, not a geographical one.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί