this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
728 points (99.9% liked)

politics

22655 readers
4187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Experts suggest that offering money in exchange for voting could be interpreted as a violation of bribery statutes.

Really softballing that one huh? YOU FUCKIN THINK IT MIGHT MAYBE POTENTIALLY BE A TEENSY WEENSY BIT ILLEGAL? They criminalized giving water to people waiting on line to vote for FUCK'S SAKE.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

They somehow don't like it when their crimes are documented and exposed...

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

We can't give people water when waiting to vote, but this is fine. 🙄

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Off topic, but that domain name sure is misleading!

[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Can somebody please take the time to explain to me how this legally works? Like he’s just out here paying private citizens to vote? Fucking. Geeez.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just ignore the law, and done

If a judge tells you to stop doing something you don't anyway

That's how that works

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And then you don't go to Prison because you are rich and a Russian asset, and the Russian asset president appointed Russian assets to the head of the DOJ and FBI who are working with you.

The only justice that will happen will come from outside the bounds of the current laws

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

The elite are not bound by the law.

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not legal, its just that laws don't matter for the ruling class In the USA. It works because the only people with the ability to legally arrest Musk aren't going to do so, and any court cases can just be endlessly delayed or appealed.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the only people with the ability to legally arrest Musk aren't going to do so

Who are these people?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The district attorneys and the department of Justice. At the state level Elon is vulnerable to the law but the federal judiciary is never going to make a move on Musk until the King of America tells them too.

[–] nature_man@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The state supreme court in Wisconsin declined to press charges for it despite what he did being objectively being illegal in that state, honestly I doubt we'll see any action against him in any state due to fear of trump or trump supporters attacking anybody who does try to hold him accountable.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Technically speaking, he’s not paying private citizens to vote.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 211 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Her disloyalty was accidentally telling the truth. What a fool.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago

Straight to Salvadorian jail

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Donald: I love the uneducated!

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 161 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's a good little free speech absolutist.

Remove content you are responsible for creating because you are self incriminating yourself.

Billionaire fear is back on the menu boys!

Keep it up and one day we'll toast to his incarceration, hopefully with all the "empathy and due process" they've been showing to our America citizens and green card holders.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago

It's nice to see that they are worried about her saying "vote" instead of daring the court system to stop them.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (2 children)

PACs should be illegal with the power they wield.

[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Citizens United was a real turn for the worse

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I've lived under that monster my entire life.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah give him the same immigrant treatment they're giving everyone else, no due process.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

I feel like that's being too kind.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The headline doesn't tell the full story.

They then re-filmed it with her not saying the word vote 🤦

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

They refilmed it without the truthiness.

[–] KbSez@piefed.social 108 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She said the truth out loud :

"My name’s Ekaterina Deistler," she said in a video posted Monday morning. "I did exactly what Elon Musk told everyone to do: sign the petition, refer friends and family, vote, and now I have a million dollars."

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's her motivation in this?

Did she realise how incredibly corrupt this is and wanted to call it out?

Did she want to shout out how fantastic the system is, that just by voting for the right candidate she earned a million?

Is she just stupid, and thought this was a brag?

What in the world could make this person admit to selling their vote to a fascist?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is she just stupid, and thought this was a brag?

I'm guessing it's this one. Seems to be a thing for a particular group.

[–] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Especially since she would have had to be involved in the rerecording that doesn't say 'vote'. Though of course suddenly losing a million dollars in legal fees might have been motivational...

[–] amadeus84@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Nobody is being arrested, so yeah, this is perfectly legal in current USA

USA! USA! USA!

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Legality is irrelevant, only what will be enforced. This will not be.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Екатерина

🤔