this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
328 points (99.1% liked)

Bluesky

1018 readers
12 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Imagine wanting to save 2% a year in taxes so you light your business of fire

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 2 days ago

TI'm Cooked

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Bring back the golden age of the translucent/orange Mac all in one.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago
[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Isn't it a Charli XCX song?

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The solution is gonna be oldest in the book: layoffs.

The guy donates to the president and attends the inauguration, empowering a dangerous and irresponsible man. The president screws up the economy. And who ends up paying for it? Not Tim Cook but the employees.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tim Cook is a gay man. He may pay for it yet.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So is Peter Thiel. They’ll be fine. It’s poor gays that have to worry.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When they run out of poor gays they'll have no use for the others.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago

I won’t cry any tears for Peter Thiel if the fascists come for him honestly

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

They still could feel their rights taken away. But yes, they won't be the ones I'll worry about.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

250 billion ... so far

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Losing 250 billion in market value is not equivalent to losing 250 billion in cash. You only lose money in stock trading when you sell at a loss.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unless you've used that stock as collateral for a loan, which billionaires love to do, because they always assume stock goes up and future them will pay the bill with less stock than today them would have to pay.

But woe be unto them if stock go down enough.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wonder if these companies are going to use their hitsquads to handle the situation or if they know something the entire world doesn't...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

"Trade wars are easy to win!" - some fucking jackass

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He spent a million dollars to curry favor with the man who's going to control a lot of their interests for four years.

I think the shareholders would agree that its a good bet.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The shareholders who, as a whole, just lost $250B? You think?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let's be honest, if Apple didn't pay that $1m then the shareholders would still have lost $250B. $1m is nothing in this.

[–] Walican132 17 points 2 days ago

Yeah scale. A million is like .001 billions. I would spend .001. Scale it down would you spend a tenth of a cent to possibly save $250? Yes.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll toss this friendly jab, at the risk of offending SatansMaggotyCumFart:

At least you're not a total failure!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't have a long list of enemies but you just made it on there.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I tagged you Fondant so I can remember.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

That's my evil twin.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago

Yes, hindsight is twenty-twenty, there was speculations about how Trump would implement the tariffs before he did it, and before it could be seen as taking the necessary steps to prevent the tariffs that Apple would be affected by, and bow it can be seen as it could have been worse.

As for loss of stock value, as long as the shareholders don't sell out of panic, they still have the shares and can recover their losses if the share price goes up.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

for four years

Someone's an optimist.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So basically you’re saying he had to pay fief to the king.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More like protection money to the mob boss.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

They are the same picture...

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Some great investment opportunities coming over the next several months, good luck everyone.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

The thing that constantly boggles my mind is that Trump could have extorted $50 billion out of the Saudis on Inauguration Day 2016.

I mean, Team Rocket could have figured that scam out.