this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
336 points (99.1% liked)

Bluesky

1039 readers
491 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

250 billion ... so far

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Losing 250 billion in market value is not equivalent to losing 250 billion in cash. You only lose money in stock trading when you sell at a loss.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Unless you've used that stock as collateral for a loan, which billionaires love to do, because they always assume stock goes up and future them will pay the bill with less stock than today them would have to pay.

But woe be unto them if stock go down enough.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Imagine wanting to save 2% a year in taxes so you light your business of fire

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Some great investment opportunities coming over the next several months, good luck everyone.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Isn't it a Charli XCX song?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago

TI'm Cooked

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Bring back the golden age of the translucent/orange Mac all in one.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The solution is gonna be oldest in the book: layoffs.

The guy donates to the president and attends the inauguration, empowering a dangerous and irresponsible man. The president screws up the economy. And who ends up paying for it? Not Tim Cook but the employees.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tim Cook is a gay man. He may pay for it yet.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So is Peter Thiel. They’ll be fine. It’s poor gays that have to worry.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When they run out of poor gays they'll have no use for the others.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 6 points 6 days ago

I won’t cry any tears for Peter Thiel if the fascists come for him honestly

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

They still could feel their rights taken away. But yes, they won't be the ones I'll worry about.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wonder if these companies are going to use their hitsquads to handle the situation or if they know something the entire world doesn't...

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He spent a million dollars to curry favor with the man who's going to control a lot of their interests for four years.

I think the shareholders would agree that its a good bet.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The shareholders who, as a whole, just lost $250B? You think?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -3 points 6 days ago

Yes, hindsight is twenty-twenty, there was speculations about how Trump would implement the tariffs before he did it, and before it could be seen as taking the necessary steps to prevent the tariffs that Apple would be affected by, and bow it can be seen as it could have been worse.

As for loss of stock value, as long as the shareholders don't sell out of panic, they still have the shares and can recover their losses if the share price goes up.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's be honest, if Apple didn't pay that $1m then the shareholders would still have lost $250B. $1m is nothing in this.

[–] Walican132 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah scale. A million is like .001 billions. I would spend .001. Scale it down would you spend a tenth of a cent to possibly save $250? Yes.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll toss this friendly jab, at the risk of offending SatansMaggotyCumFart:

At least you're not a total failure!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't have a long list of enemies but you just made it on there.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tagged you Fondant so I can remember.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

That's my evil twin.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

for four years

Someone's an optimist.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So basically you’re saying he had to pay fief to the king.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like protection money to the mob boss.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

They are the same picture...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

"Trade wars are easy to win!" - some fucking jackass

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

The thing that constantly boggles my mind is that Trump could have extorted $50 billion out of the Saudis on Inauguration Day 2016.

I mean, Team Rocket could have figured that scam out.