this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
381 points (98.7% liked)

politics

22913 readers
3850 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 150 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As opposed to all of the non crucial red lines he passed before?

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 129 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes. He is now directly and mockingly violating the constitution and an explicit Supreme Court order. It is now a completely naked constitutional crisis for all the public to see.

Reasonable people have seen it happening since long before today, but today marks a shift from a more covert assault to an open one, and that is noteworthy.

Eta: I don't mean they were really covert before, either, to be clear. They dropped any remaining veil of plausible deniability today though. And then also let it slip on recording that the intent is to deprive US citizens of due process and ship "terrorists" (read: undesirables) to El Salvador, too. Today is a historic day, sadly.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

You are correct. He was defying injunctions before. That’s only a contempt of court charge. There are rulings that he is defying.

He’s actually created two constitutional crises today. They refused to admit the AP into the Oval Office for the press conference with Bukele.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well now the President and his government are openly saying that they will kidnap anyone they don't like off the street, or out of their homes or schools, and disappear them to a foreign prison where they may be tortured, enslaved, and/or killed, without any justification, evidence, accusation or due process. Any American, or anyone else in the USA, can be going about their daily business and the cops can kidnap you and traffick you that same day into a lifetime of torture in a foreign dictatorship famous for human rights abuses, and no one in the world can help you.

All these years we've had to put up with Americans going on about needing guns to protect themselves from tyranny and the importance of free speech, and when an actual tyrannical dictator starts disappearing people for their political views, their race or (it's coming) their gender identity or sexual orientation, Americans do nothing to stop it. In fact, many of the "guns and free speech" crowd just love it. Until the police come for them.

[–] Mohaim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More than 1.4% of the US population (5 million people) protested on the same day nationwide a few days ago. It's not nothing. It gives me some hope. I'm a non-passing trans woman and am well aware of the coming danger.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

It is an encouraging start and I don't mean to diminish the value of it. I hope you get through this time safely and without things getting too unpleasant for you.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All the lines have been red for a few YEARS now. Hello...is anybody there?...anybody listening?

The direction this is going is BAD.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It all should have ended when he refused to rent to black people.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

The first law he broke, the first lie he told. It all went downhill (for us) from there.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's about Kilmar Ábrego García

Whom Stephen Miller says he was not mistakenly taken to El Salvador

"He was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador," Miller said, pushing back on the Justice Department's repeated assertions in numerous court filings that Garcia was sent to a notorious Salvadoran prison last month because of "an administrative error."

“This was the right person sent to the right place,” Miller said, despite the Supreme Court's criticism of the removal in a ruling last week.

And the El Salvadorian president won't release him

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/president-el-salvador-wont-return-deported-man-kilmar-abrego-garcia-rcna201136

Shit is beyond fucked up. This is literally how wars start.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago

Fuck, I hate that smug Miller nazi fuck!

I’m finding myself genuinely hoping for a military coup at this point, because I’d trust almost any Admiral or General in the armed forces a damn sight more than I’d trust any of these fucking psychotic fascists. What the actual fuck is this timeline.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Americans. This is the day you find out that in the future this'll happen to you if you complain about Trump in too public a way or in front of the wrong person. Who does trump hate more than immigrants? People who disagree with him.

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if my being disappeared would get my mom to understand what she's supporting.

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think you'll ask her?

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

She wouldn't believe it until it happened. Hypothetical seems beyond her.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please remind the Supreme Court that if they've abdicated their power, they have no power left.

Nothing should spur a red judge into action like the loss of power.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Too bad they were appointed to those positions specifically to abdicate power.

If American protesters were smart they would arrest the president of El Salvador and use him as collateral for a prisoner swap.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So if you know you are going to get disappeared without a trial, then it seems logical to resist ICE capture by all means available. Given the high rate of gun ownership in the US, I am truly surprised we aren't hearing about gunfights and standoffs and hero ICE people being killed by those allegedly already violence predisposed alleged gang members they are rounding up.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Because, even in a world where you can buy assault rifles at the mall, it is generally only the upper middle class who are able to afford to arm themselves
  2. The idea of "Everywhere I go it is high noon at the o-k corral and I need to be ready to quickdraw on a toddler at a moment's notice" is a decidedly White American mentality
  3. People are generally either getting rounded up at border control (where you can't have a gun because other countries are sane), at work during a raid, or getting head bagged off the street. None of which are situations where pulling your EDC glock with one in the chamber is going to do much because they have body armor and assault rifles

If they don't stop him, they approve of what he's doing.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And another one… and another one…

[–] Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And another one gone and another one gone,

Another red line is crossed,

Hey, he's gonna cross you too!

Another red line is crossed...

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We got'em this time," he says knowingly.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social -1 points 1 day ago