this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
303 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2840 readers
831 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You go Al Gore, still wonder how different things would be if you won

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If his win was recognized. He probably won Florida, but they never let the hand recount he was ahead in finish.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Such a fucked up situation. I like to imagine that another timeline had him become president and our government pivoted to seriously focusing more on combating climate change and pressuring the rest of the world to step up. It's not an amazing timeline, but it's one where the world isn't facing imminent collapse of countless ecosystems and fascism didn't take over the US.

[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not to mention we would have lost so many fewer lives to Man-bear-pig

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is very true. RIP man-bear-pig victims.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

We would get cereal.

[–] kelseybcool@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Plus you'd get to poop just by thinking about it.

!Apologies if I butchered the family guy reference!<

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Jan 6th was the second recent coup attempt in the US. The Brooks Brothers Riot was the first, and it was successful.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Probably not that different, honestly. The seeds of today's fascist outbreak were already firmly planted by then. It was such a close election in 2000, it's quite likely he'd have lost to a charismatic opponent in 2004 over discontent with Democrats or green policy. (An echo of either George Bush's loss in 1992, or Jimmy Carter's loss in 1980.) Don't forget that our current President first ran in 2000; if Dubya hadn't been riding high on incumbent advantage and 9/11 patriotism, there's a chance he might have run again in 2004. With the stochastic nature of events, we could've been in this situation years earlier, too.

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

we can imagine gore would've acted cautiously in advance of 9/11 though

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Me2. Also sometimes about the arms for hostages bullshit with reagan.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

I hate these headlines.

BECAUSE IT FUCKING BLATANTLY IS!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Mister Gore, it took you a few more years than it took others.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Damn Gore, better late than never.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

And your decision to surrender the 2000s to Bush is what got us here, all because you didn't want to go against the norms.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

More specifically, he didn't want to allow the precedent of allowing the supreme Court to simply arbitrarily pick the president if the Republicans whined enough, which is what was happening.

Good thought, bad execution.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And in that want ... He allowed the supreme court the power to arbitrarily pick the president.

Maybe he should've, you know, fought. but Dems don't do that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's hardly fair. democrats fight Progressives every chance they get.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Progressives don't fight either.

All modern leftists are either inactive, or they're mostly just analyzing the politics, with some light protest that isn't really commited enough to win unless the fascists decide to just fold.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

ah yes, this is the attitude that will fix everything

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

He also didn't want the mass unrest this would trigger.

And so people were demobilized.