this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
719 points (99.9% liked)

politics

23188 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An American citizen born and raised in California is unsettled after receiving an e-mail from the US Department of Homeland Security ordering him to leave the country "immediately."

Aldo Martinez-Gomez received the DHS notice on April 11, threatening "criminal prosecution" and fines if he does not depart within seven days.

Martinez-Gomez works full-time assisting immigrants in court for a non-profit and believes his advocacy work may have placed him on the government's radar.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 57 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Martinez-Gomez works full-time assisting immigrants in court for a non-profit

This is quite the Hanlon's Razor situation.

There have been a number of US citizens who have received these emails, all of them do some kind of work related to immigration. It's pretty clear that whoever sent out these emails just collected every email related to immigration work, and sent out a mass email. That satisfies Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

But! The fact that they're doing this without even a passing effort at accuracy, with no concern about getting it wrong, shows how it's motivated by malice too. It's the ICE version of a reckless homicide, they're doing something they have to know would normally get them fired if not charged. But, they don't care because the current racist administration is going to revel in the pain.

So, it's a weird situation where Hanlon's Razor is both right and wrong.

[–] Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem with "they're just incompetent", is that it let's malicious people feign stupidity. And if it is a combination, it doesn't matter which aspects are one or the other. They are dangerous all the same and shouldn't be allowed to continue hurting people. But a combination of apathy, indoctrination, and infiltration means they'll likely never see any real consequences. Or if they do, they were likely expendable and their excision doesn't accomplish anything. People need to, at a minimum, vote. And preferably get more involved. Organize. Start local.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

It may let malicious people feign stupidity, but that doesn't mean you have to just forgive them.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Basically you're saying, attribute the email to stupidity; attribute the stupidity to malice.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think anybody who wasn't malicious would be very careful about this process. They would know that a mistake was possible and that they should triple-check everything they were doing. So, it's more that the stupidity is the evidence for the malice. That, and the fact that there wasn't a massive apology and attempt to correct the mistake when these news stories started coming out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is there reason to believe that Hanlon's Razor is correct?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Occam's Razor comes from a 14th century priest who studied logic. It's been gone over by philosophers in the centuries since and is generally considered valid.

Hanlon's Razor comes from a joke book published in 1980.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Hanlon's Razor is basically a special case of Occam's Razor.

Making a mistake or doing something stupid is easy. Conspiring to do something malicious is not as easy. The simpler explanation is generally that something is a mistake rather than an elaborate conspiracy. So, Occam's Razor says that the simplest explanation (a mistake) is probably the right one.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fwiw Occam's razor is actually a little more precise than "choose the simplest explanation". Specifically, it defines what "simplest" actually means, in such a way that makes it easier to see how you could describe Hanlon's razor as a special case of Occam's.

Occam's razor is that you should choose the solution which requires the fewest assumptions. Assuming someone made a mistake is precisely one assumption. That they were acting maliciously requires several, including having the motive to do it and, in a case involving large organisations, having the capability to cover it up.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From a logical perspective, if you're trying to discover the truth of something you're inevitably going to start weighing and eliminating variables. It makes sense to start from the absolute bottom, prove or disprove that, then move on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

No. And it's a boon to "people" like the Trump regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 179 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is why I said, the first time it happened with that immigration lawyer, she should have immediately brought it to a judge.

This will keep happening until there's some kind of court action.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 110 points 4 days ago

And then it'll just keep happening because there is zero enforcement.

[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where are they getting these emails from? I don't mean where they are sent from, but the email addresses? Do US citizens share their email with the government?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In an email? I would have just, rightfully so, assumed it was some type of scam.

[–] SabinStargem 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is a scam backed by the executive branch.

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I am now completely jaded. Whatever faith I had in institutions has completely eroded. If nobody gets held accountable, who's to say everything isn't a scam? I guess you gotta just use the duck method.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 113 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is why they aren't allowing due process, which would expose many more "mistakes". There's likely many more who were already sent to the El Salvador concentration camp than just Kilmar Abrego Garcia. For example, this poor guy. How many more?! 😠

[–] SabinStargem 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hope he gets armed guards. ICE is a trafficking gang.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

this requires coordination. we have to work harder.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These aren't mistakes. The cheeseburger Gestapo are coming.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Yup. They are seeing how many people they can disappear without anyone noticing

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Fuck these fixing incompetent fascist.

Honestly as a American born Asian American, I'm just wondering when this will be happening to me.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Same. I was telling my wife I'm legitimately afraid to be walking around by myself now. I used to feel safe wherever I went and now I am always looking over my shoulder or scoping things out before I get out of my car...just to get groceries or something.

This is fucked.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yup. I've told my wife that when they do come, I'm not one to go quietly.

Remember that 2A is for everyone, pepper spray is legal, and check your knife laws and your 1st amendment right to protest is still a thing.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I actually just got one of those relica practice pistols that uses CO2 cartridges to shoot pepper balls at up to 350fps.

It's non-lethal, but it'll still hurt a bit.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The point of the pepperball gun being? You know they'll shoot you dead when they spot it, right?

Might as well be carrying the real thing instead.

[–] Ianthe__Tridentarius@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not everyone has the ability to kill someone, even in self defense. Some folks aren't built to take lives, and there's nothing wrong with that.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough but in that case maybe don't carry a gun at all. Like I said, it's basically suicidal.

Regardless of the current, evolving circumstances, law enforcement officers treat any gun as a deadly weapon. So they will shoot first & ask questions later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Fair, but I don't have a CC permit and this is technically legal for me to carry. If real agents show up, I'm fucked regardless. But if wannabe white supremacists in my area want to play gravy seals, it will do just fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

First they came for the ..

Doesn't matter when.

It will.

Unless you and everyone else start to speak up for the others.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

speak up? how about get armed and coordinated?

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“Criminal prosecution” requires a system of law. However the lawless dictator that overthrew the throne has no intention of acknowledging that there is a system of law in place that doesn’t benefit him directly.

So, this could end poorly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bonus@lemm.ee 31 points 4 days ago

First saw this pop up on LA local news IG account, knew something was up with all the trolling responses dominating. There's really no way to even report fake/suspiscious accounts over there. Very glad/relieved to see rational comments here.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

If I were a judge, him using “I'm not trying to be…” would be all the evidence I’d need to prove he’s an American citizen. They must think I’m Boo Boo the Fool if they deport that man.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they just open the database and search for "gomez"

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

One of these days they'll mess with the wrong Gomez

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I read that the reason this happens is that immigrants use their lawyers’ email when filling out immigration forms instead of using their own email.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If that's the case, why is the email addressed to him and not one of his client's names? How would you even know which one it's supposed to be going to?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Looking at the body and subject in the scan of the printout of the email indicates they didn't specify his name.

His name appears in the To: line of the header, but without the opportunity to examine the raw headers of the email, I would assume that his mail client replaced his email address with his name for display purposes.

While there is certainly more than enough incompetence, it seems clear that it falls short of actually targeting him.

[–] jdnewmil@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Failing to provide the name of the person in the body of the email is incomptetence.

Fox included the disclaimer about contact email... but IMO the person who built the mail merge was incompetent and that will not prevent ICE from coming after Aldo.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is a huge mess. How can someone write a letter that does not contain the addressee? Let alone a letter that is threatening you to run away or else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You're expecting competence from this administration?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›