this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
1114 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

6864 readers
2588 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 5 points 2 hours ago

Yo ho! Yo ho!

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] Taokan@sh.itjust.works 33 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone wants to run a subscription service, until they have everyone on a subscription. Then instead of celebrating that they won capitalism, they go and start with the exclusive extra addons and upgrades. Because unfortunately no company in the history of companies has ever said that's it, we're making enough money, let's relax.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 hours ago

actually, plenty of companies say exactly that.

The thing is, they're small privately owned companies. not giant corporations.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The Last Of Us season 2 being on a different, new subscription service is very much the last straw.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I use an Emby/Jellyfin stream. There's nothing I don't have.

[–] rippermonty@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You should start your own subscription service 😜

They are out there and of varying quality. If only db0 had a good place to source, but c/piracy is very anti paid piracy (oxymoron I know) but sometimes convenience is worth a few $$ for non 1337 haxx0rz in the real world

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's only if it's an older movie. The latest Captain America is available to rent for $25, or to buy for $30.

Or you can do what I did, and sail the high seas for it.

[–] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I kind of laughed at that. I wouldnt be surpised if even older movies cost a bit more now. But even renting a new movie is way too expensive now.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago

Or I can keep it for 0.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 88 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

There was a time when almost everything was on Netflix. As a consumer, having all my content in one place for $10/mo is awesome, but according to capitalism, it is a problem that needed to be fixed.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The part that's wildest to me is that nowadays with all the ways services are trying extract more value from their users (ads, increasing rates, reducing library size, restricting access to features, etc ) plus the DRM, the media consumption experience of just having the media files is so much better than the experience one can have through most of the streaming services or even DVDs with all of the unstoppable prerolls

Whether you rip your own DVDs (legally murky) or you're just watching a bunch of public domain silent films, or pirating, it's really hard to beat just having the .mkv and opening it in your player of choice.

About the only way to compete with that is one decent service with good quality, no ads, an extremely wide collection and minimally invasive DRM

[–] DrainKikoLake@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Every time I head to the second-hand store I pick up a couple new CDs and DVDs. It's great! I'm paying max $3.99 apiece and I'll own them forever.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 52 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

The crazy thing is loads of people stopped pirating and paid for a streaming service that was affordable, worked, met thier needs.

Now it's all splintered with corporations wanting a piece of the pie.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It won't stop until the system reaches its ultimate form and each movie has its own subscription service.

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So, buying physical media again lol

[–] illegible@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

except that you don't have any sort of long terms rights to it and it costs more.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

And they know when we watch, pause, fast forward..
..and all your ID

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

So, renting physical media again.

That last remaining blockbuster is playing the long game.

[–] oz1sej@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

Back to piracy, it is, then. Yarrr! ☠️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Movies were on Netflix, TV shows were on Hulu. It was great.

Once Netflix started on their whole “half of all our offerings are going to be original content” is when it began to go downhill. Literally no one (aside from executives) was sitting around going “man, I can’t wait until Netflix starts making shows and movies!” They were a service. That’s all they ever needed to be.

[–] illegible@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 hours ago

I think they were forced into it when the other companies decided they could make some of that sweet netflix money, so they stopped licensing to netflix and built their own services. Netflix had no choice but to build their own content.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Idk I know I was pretty excited for Netflix's early original content because the proposition was like "HBO, but on the internet and you can watch it any time" and they were doing big budget stuff. Things only went south when they didn't keep up the HBO level quality and ruined their reputation to the point where I see "Netflix original" and immediately think "garbage TV"

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It really did hurt my ressources for pirating though. After not downloading anything for years, finding the right sites and proxies again was hard.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Except that the technology has improved and now Sonarr and radarr take all effort out of the equation.

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I pay for a VPN once a year and then everything is free. Ahoy mateys!

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Was showing the inlaws the bingie skin i'd been setting up...they explicitly said this subscription shit was becoming unmanageable and they were seriously considering setting sail

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 56 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Or even better, "even though you pay for the ad free subscription, this video is only available with ads".

So it's cable all over again

[–] SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago

Enshitification

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And it’s never anything in demand either. It’s always some random movie you came across on Wikipedia when you were scrolling through some actor’s filmography, and a minor interest was sparked. These companies create no value and hoard wealth and power. The whole copyright regime is tyrannical.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

99% of these problems would be solved if copyright lasted a reasonable amount of time. IMO copyright should last for 50 years from the date of publication or the life of the original creator, whichever is longer. That way the author has control over their work during their own lifetime, and like an author's husband won't just be screwed if his wife published a blockbuster book and then dies soon after, but we don't have Disney milking shit from the 1920s for a hundred years. It's absurd to me that I have to pay Amazon $4 to watch Citizen Kane, a movie that came out before my grandparents were born, and that's the only legal way to watch it. Literally nobody who was involved in making that movie is still alive to benefit from it, it's only people making money from doing literally nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

you guys remember this old goldie?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I'm relatively happy with the higher quality older television shows. I don't really see a need to watch the latest stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 150 points 14 hours ago (45 children)
load more comments (45 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›