this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
95 points (98.0% liked)

News

29172 readers
3631 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Eww it's made by KB? But how will the home owners be able to burn it down for insurance money when they realize everything about it is total garbage?

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago

After next wild fire:

Home for Sale! Next Open House w/ barbecue!

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

What a silly article. California building code already requires the design features mentioned in the article; i.e. the hardscape, window design, etc -- so just about any house is getting built this way. The only thing somewhat unique is the metal fence.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Before reading: let me guess, they're going back to older building techniques, larger house spacing, etc. and not building things on top of each other.

Edit: After reading, pretty much. Wider spacing between homes, metal fences instead of wooden, even less vegetation, closing up holes. Now if only they could actually build homes to the standard. AZ contractors are absolute dog shit at building homes to the minimum code as it is, are they honestly going to do extra work reliably? Hell no. They'll just charge more for it, say it was all done, and homeowners that don't know any better will get shafted yet again.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Edit: After reading, pretty much. Wider spacing between homes

Oh boy, even more sprawl! Awesome. \s

I guess it would be too much to ask to -- oh, I don't know -- maybe build appropriate density so that they wouldn't have to expand into the hills to begin with?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now all they have to do is re-construct the last 250 years worth of construction to the new standards. Easy!

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Dont worry. Most of those will burn down, leaving plenty of room for houses to be built to the new requirements.

Best case is enough houses get built to this standard and intermixed into those neighborhoods to give a type of "herd immunity" from fires moving house to house. Hell, even a good bulwark of these in a line facing the forest might do it.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

That sounds suspiciously like vaccine herd immunity; be careful or the Department of Health & Human Services will come for you..

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If California just built Japanese homes using their methods and their materials, homes that are already multiple generations into being built from the ground up to withstand earthquakes, fires, and floods, it would severely curtail suburban destruction without doing anything else.

“But Japanese homes are designed to be torn down.”

The ramshackle construction during the bubble in the 1970s and 1980s were not built with longevity in mind, yes. Modern Japanese homes are very different and can easily last for generations.

In 30 years Japan is going to be nothing but a patchwork of pre-war and post-2000 construction.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Aren’t most current houses in Japan built for like 20/30 yrs? They even have a weird lease system for land or something along those lines where you don’t own the land where you build. I don’t think they are much into generational housing; that would be more of a thing in Europe where houses 100+ aren’t uncommon.

[–] alphahowler@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven’t read the article but I’ll take an educated guess that this home isn’t necessarily earthquake proof, right?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything built in California today has to meet certain standards for earthquake resistance, if it didn’t meet those it wouldn’t get built.

[–] tal 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also, a not-insignificant amount of earthquake resistance, in the sense of resisting the effects of an earthquake, is actually fire resistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1906_San_Francisco_earthquake

At 05:12 AM Pacific Standard Time on Wednesday, April 18, 1906, the coast of Northern California was struck by a major earthquake with an estimated moment magnitude of 7.9 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). High-intensity shaking was felt from Eureka on the North Coast to the Salinas Valley, an agricultural region to the south of the San Francisco Bay Area. Devastating fires soon broke out in San Francisco and lasted for several days. More than 3,000 people died and over 80% of the city was destroyed. The event is remembered as the deadliest earthquake in the history of the United States. The death toll remains the greatest loss of life from a natural disaster in California's history and high on the list of worst American disasters.

As damaging as the earthquake and its aftershocks were, the fires that burned out of control afterward were far more destructive.[28] It has been estimated that at least 80%, and at most over 95%, of the total destruction was the result of the subsequent fires.