this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
966 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

7966 readers
2033 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Hey big shoutout to all the Redditors and Lemmy guys who told me that we can have no restrictions on free speech because if we restrict Nazis they will restrict us if they ever gain power.

Welp, here ya go...like I told you...and many of you blocked and/or banned me for saying it. Ironic.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

i felt like the trolls on reddits are just RU stoking anger and division.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You'll never easily get through to those people. They hold idealism over material reality in many cases.

The best way I've found to get even some of them to at least stop and think for a minute is to ask if preventing people from doing things like:

  1. Screaming slurs next to a preschool
  2. Publishing deliberately false information to ruin someone's reputation
  3. Doxxing someone who was mean to you

...is justified. If they say yes, then maybe unlimited free speech isn't perfect, and restricting Nazis could be justified. If they say no, then you'll know they're a lost cause.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is the problem the speech or the people tbat speak it?

[–] Oggyb@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Great question. Intention matters, so many countries focus on speech that can only be malicious, like incitement to violence in the UK or Nazi salutes in Germany.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 46 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you make the 1st Amendment illegal, the rest of the Constitution cannot be far behind.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

if? people have already been blackbagged for their speech. this is just encoding something already in effect.

[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

How tf can u ban a boycott, how is that even possible let alone provable 🤦 Politics aside if I js don't like a brand that endorses or has ties to Israel would I then be subject to charges. How u trynna force people to buy from certain companies, what if I was bruk, would I be breaking the law? 🤡

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Excuse me I saw you drinking flat water where is your soda stream ice this one get this one

[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This will probably be used to target protestors and organizers of political movements.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the boycott itself can't reasonably be prosecuted. But it can be used to suppress discussion (e.g. organization, coordination) of said boycott.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

it will probably use to target protestors, and groups criticial of israel.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 53 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

And the USSC has definitely ruled that money is equivalent to speech. So boycott activity is logically covered under this Amendment.

If this law passes, a lot of people are going to have a rough year or two until they can get a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because republicans care so much about laws they don't agree with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is that legal? It doesn't sound legal. I'm sure they could make it illegal for US government agencies to boycott Israel because that's at least partially a foreign policy decision, but private businesses? What are they gonna do, force you to buy Israeli goods?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

narrator: it didn't sound legal because it wasn't.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Incremental steps into the police state.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

We are in a police state. This is more.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 39 points 21 hours ago (11 children)

How do I boycott Israel in the first place? Not booking my next vacation there? Do I get 20 years in prison for that?

[–] Splenetic@lemm.ee 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It seems like theatre. How will you ever prove that I chose Burger King over McDonalds for political reasons?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

https://bdsmovement.net/Act-Now-Against-These-Companies-Profiting-From-Genocide

Whatever the legal status of officially boycotting Isreal, there's still no law against just incidentally not doing business with the companies.

Before someone says they can't avoid some of these: OK, then boycott the other ones.

Whatever sand you have to throw, throw it in the gears of genocide. Don't just do nothing.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The Constitution says there's also no law against actively and loudly not doing business with the companies

[–] sabo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 17 hours ago

disoccupied.com

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 68 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Didn't CU rule that spending money is free speech? So isn't compelling the spending of money compelling speech? Sounds straight up unconstitutional.(as if that fucking matters these days)

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Rich people spending money is free speech.

Anti-genocide activists not spending money is terrorism.

AKA the usual.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 18 points 19 hours ago

Wait you first blame us for not having free speach, because lying about the holocaust is illegal and now you ban boycotting Israel for engaging in a de facto genocide?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (8 children)

How do you outlaw a boycott? It's not an act, it's a non-act. An absence of a purchase. How do you distinguish boycott from just not buying something you don't want or need like any other item. Are we going to be required to put so much of our purchases toward Isreal now?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

boycott

probably using to target groups that are protesting against israel.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 49 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Ding ding ding.

This is how they "lawfully" throw "dissidents" into the gulag.

Remember...most of what Hitler did was technically legal and above-board. Because they controlled the laws and shaped them as they saw fit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well, we now know what death cult is behind the misery of literally the entire world.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Irony: Nazis are teaching the rest of us who hate Nazis how to hate the Jews

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

How tf do you ban boycotts? What if I just don't want to consoom all the time?

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 15 points 17 hours ago

Probably that is a threat for anyone spreading boycott movement in social media. So if you post McDonald are shit, bad for the health and do not consume them, you are ok. If you post don't go to McDonald because they support a genocide by Israel, then it is another story.

And so the fear begins. Its a first step.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›