this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
467 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

11540 readers
2016 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 100 points 19 hours ago
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 53 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

So hopefully they improve the transit situation in the cities & surrounding areas as well.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

both dallas and houston have somewhat okay rail networks though

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 53 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The Train got cancelled the other week by Texas govt.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 29 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I knew the feds had cancelled grant money to it, I didn't know the state killed it. I know they're all in the pocket of big oil, but it's just wild to me how trains are apparently woke.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago

They are woke because they have potential to improve lives regardless of class, race, or gender. Obviously they should have to "earn" those improvements by buying a car instead.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 11 points 18 hours ago

Well that sucks

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 11 points 18 hours ago

At least in Houston, the transit isn't horrible if you stay in the inner loop. They gave a few rail lines and the buses run frequently there, so it's probably fine in theory. But if you have to leave the inner core...

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 18 hours ago

Well, you've got to start somewhere. CAHSR has been the impetus for a lot of sprawled out central valley cities to get their shit together. Fresno is probably the prime example of this. We're trying to drag Merced into getting its shit together, though kicking and screaming it may be.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Displacing minorities is a feature. Otherwise Those People might build up generational wealth, and eventually start considering themselves white people’s equals. POSIWID.

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 27 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

(Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Ever expanding the number of lanes to meet the demands of 10 years prior is the Texan way.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 20 points 19 hours ago

Don’t forget ignoring literal decades of data that show adding lanes doesn’t fix traffic

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In a couple decades it’ll be parking lots and highways with no city left.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of is now tbh in Dallas and Houston lol

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Goddamn that's beautiful. I can practically taste the freedom 🥲

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

I'm too lazy to do that, but maps of Texan cities where their highways were edited to water bodies would really prove this point.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Land is more important than people. That’s why Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 18 hours ago

Steal stolen land, you mean.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago

See, what happened is Texas heard something about bullets and got a bit ahead of itself.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there's in interstate project in the northeast that's pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

what, railway? no no, this is a superhighway for coupled-car vehicles!

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 9 points 19 hours ago

Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.

(Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).