this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
305 points (99.7% liked)

politics

23472 readers
3435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Air Force Dumb

Qatar is gifting Trump a $400 million luxury 747 to serve as a temporary Air Force One, but experts warn that retrofitting it to meet presidential security standards could take years, cost hundreds of millions more, and risk national security due to potential embedded surveillance.

The current VC-25s aren't just repainted 747s. They're a pair of flying fortresses that must be capable of allowing the president to run the country, survive wartime conditions (even nuclear), and be totally secure from outside influence or intrusion. While the precise details of the current airframe are a tightly guarded secret, some details are included on government fact sheets or have been revealed in various media reports. For a start, it must have an in-flight refueling capability so the president can go anywhere in the world and stay up as long as needed. Retrofitting this to an existing 747 would be very expensive, as the feds would need to strengthen portions of the hull to handle the refueling system and reconfigure the fuel tanks to handle trim issues.

Then there's the hull, which is known to be armored, and the windows are also thicker than you'd find on a normal flight. The government would also need to build in weapons systems like the chaff rockets used against radar-guided missiles, flares against heat seekers, and AN/ALQ-204 Matador Infrared Countermeasure systems, or similar to try and confuse incoming missiles. Next up, the engines and electrical systems would have to be replaced. The electronics in the current VC-25s are hardened as much as possible against an electromagnetic pulse that would be generated by a nuclear detonation. There are also claims that the aircraft have extra shielding in the engines to help against missile fragments should a physical attack happen.

Next up are communications. Air Force One has air-to-ground, air-to-air, and satellite comms systems that are thought to be the equal of what's in the White House. There are at least two separate internal phone systems - one open and the other highly secure - that would need to be installed and checked as well. Then there are incidentals. Contrary to what films will tell you, there is no escape capsule on the current Air Force One, nor a rear parachute ramp, but there is a medical suite with emergency equipment and space for a physician which would already need to be installed, as well as a secured cargo area designed to prevent tampering or unauthorized access. As for the threat of embedded surveillance devices, Richard Aboulafia, managing director of aircraft consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory, said: "You'd have to take it apart piece by piece to stop a professional operator putting in lots of equipment to confuse things, like spare sensors and wiring."

"It wouldn't be in the air before 2030 at the earliest, long after he's left office and probably later than the existing planned replacements," said Aboulafia. "It makes no sense on any level, except that he wants a free 747 for himself. Nothing else makes any sense."

"What's sort of annoying about the whole thing is I'm not sure what's wrong with the current Air Force One," Aboulafia said. "Maybe if they gave it a gold makeover, he'd like it more."

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I don’t care. If the plane falls out of the sky, will that really affect me?

It’s not like this administration cares about secret information anyway. Hegseth

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 18 points 3 hours ago

Really like this story. trumps greed is on full display because wants a palace so bad he can't even fathom that this is a bad idea at every conceivable level.

Shows he doesn't care about spending money when it's himself. Dossnt care about a gift from terrorist supporters. Doesn't care about the money it would cost dismantling that to search for bugs. lol.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 19 points 3 hours ago

Cluster B personality disorder being played like a stringed puppet. There’s no way this plane isn’t rigged to surveillance and doesn’t have a kill switch.

Most people run away from Cluster B. 76 million ran to it to no vote for a democrat. And now here we are.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 hours ago

Reminds me of the bugging of the new embassy in Moscow. It's a cautionary tail in and of itself which relates to this jet.

Air and Space Forces Magazine: Cleaning the Bug House.

...“Mr. Ambassador, these are the plans that disclose how the bugging of your embassy took place, and these are the instruments that were used,” said Bakatin. “I want them turned over to your government, no strings attached.” Strauss was dumbstruck, according to an account of the incident he gave later that year. After years of denial, the Soviet intelligence arm was admitting its role in one of the most notorious espionage incidents of the 1980s: It had packed the new US Embassy office building in Moscow with sophisticated listening devices. The edifice’s structure was so riddled with bugs that some US counterespionage experts described it as nothing but a giant microphone.

[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 36 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"It makes no sense on any level, except that he wants a free 747 for himself. Nothing else makes any sense."

Glad to see this spelled out so clearly.

Putting in a reasonable amount of effort to retrofit it will be ready around 2028.

[–] mrbubblesort@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You know what? Fuck it, let him use it. Then we can all laugh when it quite literally blows up in his face.

The real dick move would be to dismantle the current AF1 so the next President pretty much has no choice but to use this monstrosity.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

"It wouldn't be in the air before 2030 at the earliest, long after he's left office"

He's not leaving office. He fought against stepping down last time and everyone has given him more power this time. He will never leave that office while he lives.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

He's neither healthy nor young. I didn't know about his odds of leaving office, but I wouldn't be surprised if the plane isn't done until after he is.

He can't be prosecuted while in office so yeah, he'll do anything he can to stay. If he somehow is removed from office he's immediately heading to Russia and never returning.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Which is why we should let him use it exactly as it is. Just don't tell him anything while he's on it, in case of espionage. He won't notice because he doesn't listen anyway. And let nobody else on it except his most loyal supporters. And of course Ellen Musk. So if it goes down, no loss to the nation.

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 1 points 3 hours ago

You're right. Him accepting it and not caring shows he thinks he's never leaving office. Well done.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 74 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

This was literally my first thought. You'd basically have to go through every one of the millions of components across every square inch to verify there was nothing sketchy going on. Not to mention, you'd have to review all of the software and firmware to make sure it wasn't modified or sabotaged in some way. It would take an excruciating amount of effort to make it "safe".

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 38 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Software alone would probably have to be replaced.

Who in their right mind in the US government would trust another country, any country, to install and run their own software on their leaders aircraft .... especially an aircraft that would be used in an emergency event.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago

Unfortunately they're not in their right mind.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the top leaders are using Signal right off the shelf without a second thought already, the dumb shits.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's not entirely true. They're also using a modified version of signal that is less secure than the default

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 hours ago

literally just handing state secrets to a rogue nation

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And even then. Integrated circuits in some system may have been replaced by fake versions carrying some extra functions, it would be relatively cheap to have this done, especially for a kingdom with billions in spare change, and damn near impossible to detect

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 7 points 4 hours ago

They could just put a gold-covered iPhone in the shitter and he'd log in and use it

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Oh please. He's already blurting out everything he knows onlate-night Xitter and Truthiness. And he refuses briefings, so that's not much anyway. Just send him up with nobody but his panderers, so any spies will only hear his shitty stories about himself. Eventually they'll get so sick of it they'll shoot him down. Oh, well!

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

It would probably be less expensive to design a completely new one from the ground up whose interior looks identical to the Qatari jet, rather than retrofit the offered one. But either way it wouldn’t be ready for years…

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hey some of us are hoping for hardcore sketch.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

I hope it explodes in midair with his whole damn family onboard.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly what I pointed out at first.

The existing presidential planes have pragmatic measures to deal with the less pleasant aspects and possibilities of presidential duties. This plane in contrast is nothing but absurd levels of luxury for rich dicks who want to show off their wealth and is unfit as a presidential plane.

The fact that Trump wants to use it as Air Force One for himself says a lot about how he views his duties as the president and how little personal sacrifice he is willing to do to serve his country.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 4 hours ago

I mean the VC-25 is basically a different plane built into the design of the 747.

Like the presidential motorcade, it's basically reinforced to all hell so it can avoid attack. Even though it's escorted, it needs those countermeasures.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Let's hope it's booby trapped and he goes down with the ship.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 hours ago

Well, the current VC-25As are painted identically snd fly together as a means of confusing an attacker on which plane the prez is on.

If Trump starts using his new plane, it won't have a twin and it will be clear which plane the prez is.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

First thing we all thought of. Please make it exploded with donny and all his government on board. I swear I'll consider believing in God if this can happen.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

Will any patriot of democracy with a functional stinger rocket please pay attention?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

This is yet another reason why the president shouldn't be a king; he shouldn't be able to make decisions that influence his own security negatively.

The head of his security should simply say "oh fucking hell's no" and that'd be it. This plane could be sabotaged in a million damn near impossible to detect ways. It could be bugged in a million undetectable ways, it's a security nightmare.

If he'd still wanted a flying palace, it'd be way, way cheaper to build one from scratch and be safe and trustworthy than to test, check, and retrofit this one.

His head of secut should be able to override his decisions when it comes to his safety

Then again, this is Cheetos USA now, so I'd say please go for it. Let quatar spy and learn all the US's secrets and then when they're done with the useful idiot, let them execute him by crashing his plane remotely. The world, the US, it'll all be a better place without him and he'll be doing exactly what he wants, he's just too dumb to keep himself alive

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

My first thought was 'trojan horse'. Give a gift that you've laced with taps, traps, and software backdoors that you know your enemy won't be able to refuse.

Purely from a national security perspective, this is a horrible fucking idea. Also from a financial perspective, this is a horrible fucking idea. Right now you have at least two fully functional AF1s that are already equipped with the property gear and take the same parts. Now you want to completely retrofit a jet from a foreign adversary that will have separate parts and maintenance requirements from the other AF1s.

Talk about asking for a mistake to happen.

You know what? Let’s apply some of that “government efficiency” idiocy that he claims to be driving. Sure. Just jump in it and start flying around. Nothing matters anymore. By all means, traipse around in an unsecured, relatively undefended beacon of American shittiness without any of the standard VIP transport countermeasures, let alone the countermeasures that exist on the current AF1. See what happens.

Children of Kali noises intensify

This whole story is just more "flood the zone" bullshit. They know this is a bad idea and that it won't work or won't work in time; they just want to manufacture another distraction that the opposition will lose its shit over.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trumps heard "free" and "jet" so he said yes. No complex thoughts will ever enter his mind about this transaction. He gets a jet and that is all that matters to him.

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I agree 100. When Trump acts this way everyone thinks he's playing 5d chess. No. It is a grown manchild wanting a sky palace and doesn't care that his mommy is telling him no. He just wants it. Meanwhile nobody can imagine that anyone would rationally act this way so it must be part of some plan. When you just take Trump and musk and all these aassholes for what they do and say you won't need to come up with excuses. Yes. We really did vote this guy in.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't that make it a perfect fit for Trump?

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Exactly, he's already a walking security disaster.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I know it's hopium, but if this ends with Trump in the middle of a smouldering crater, Qatar will give the world the best gift any of us could ask for.

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My first thought was “either Hollywood lied to me (SHOCKING) or the current 747 has a series of defenses, flares, electronic countermeasures, and what not that this new plane doesn’t have”.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 6 hours ago

The only thing Hollywood and the video game industry seems to have lied to us about is the presence of an escape pod lol. Everything else is probably mostly correct or even understated.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

I have made this point before, the main problem with the current VC-25As and the comming VC-25Bs is that neither will have the dumb Trump livery that he perposed.