this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
795 points (95.0% liked)

me_irl

6187 readers
354 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 137 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I don’t like these generational generalizations.

Not an xer but I feel the same. I’d rather read twenty minutes than watch a 5 minute YouTube video.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Usually, reading the content of a 5 min video takes 2-3 mins. Even when I message someone back in between.

Gen Z btw

Fuck most others of this generation

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 90 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“Elder millennial”/Oregon Trail generation here, and I’d generally rather read it, too. I’ve found it often only takes 5 minutes to read an article where the video would be 20 minutes. Sometimes a video works better for a how-to, but often an article will be a faster choice.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 39 points 2 weeks ago

It's also much easier to retain information skimming through text compared to a video of just a person talking.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oregon Trail generation

Holy shit, you're 185 years old? What's the secret?

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Surviving dysentery is probably the big one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm getting really tired of the news "articles" that have a video as well... I can't stand clicking a post here on Lemmy and all the sudden a video is autoplaying... Like stfu I just want to read it, not hear some jackass newscaster and I especially hate the autoplay...

[–] peto@lemm.ee 31 points 2 weeks ago

The best ones are when you scroll down the page and the video comes too. I wish suffering on no one but were I to meet that particular 'innovator'.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago

The autoplay kills me too. I used to complain about it but we seem to be in the minority.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d rather read twenty minutes than watch a 5 minute YouTube video.

I don’t think I’ve ever encountered a video, YouTube or otherwise, that conveys information faster than an article. It’s usually 10 minutes of video to convey what would take 3 minutes to read while providing greater detail.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

I ran into a small series of videos on repairing camcorders that actually delivered the video content appropriately. Basically no talking (I think at one point they poke the broken thing and make an "eh?" Noise to indicate you should pay attention to that). Shows the thing, shows the problem, showed removing the part, showed fixing it, and then putting it back.

In my experience visual modes of communication work better for conveying visual information. Describing how you should position yourself for doing a task is harder than just showing a picture from a few angles. Likewise, describing how something moves is easier with an video because you can see it moving.

Unfortunately, a lot of people aren't looking to make the thing they're making efficient, but to keep you there longer for engagement. Text is easy to skip around in, so verbose text describing what could be a 30 second video isn't as effective. Inflating something that would be a four minute read on history or something into a video gives something harder to skim and still get information out of, and it's way longer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

I’d rather read twenty minutes than watch a 5 minute YouTube video.

Part of the reason why I have no patience for video as nonfiction is because I read a lot faster than videos (or audio) can communicate information. So for me, I'd rather read a 5 minute document than a 20 minute video, even if one is literally a transcription of the other.

At least with audio I can take that in while doing something else.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 95 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The worst is instructional manuals being replaced with videos.

Going back 10 seconds, 20 times, so that you can visually see how two pieces fit together is way more annoying than just looking at a visual diagram on a printed page. Especially when you've got both hands full with stuff.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 weeks ago

I like a combination there. I want a diagram of the parts and how they fit, and a short video of installation or removal. Just like a picture describes a physical scene better than words, a video describes a changing physical scene better than a picture.

I still want text describing the steps of the process and a diagram showing what it should look like when I've done it right, I just also want someone to show me how to actually execute the tricky bit.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I put something together I got at Walmart like 10 years ago and it came with print instructions that had links to .gif files that were short and looping showing each step clearly

I though "oh wow if some random Chinese product does this surely it'll spread" and now feel so dumb for having thought that

[–] vorpuni@jlai.lu 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would agree except the instruction manuals and diagrams are often shit or unclear (even IKEA ones sometimes). To thread a sewing machine it didn't tell me how to get one of the hooks out, turns out it's coupled to the motor so I simply had to turn the wheel. The video made that clear. And yes I'm stupid and it was probably obvious but manuals that come with machines you can buy off the shelf should be for idiots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hate it when I'm looking for a single piece of information like how to change a specific setting on my device and there's no text available, just a highly rated video that goes like:

"Hey guys, it's your boy ManualExplainer here and welcome to another video. Be sure to like and subscribe to my channel. And remember to click on the little bell icon so you get notified whenever I put up a new video. All right, let's get to it. But first, a word from today's sponsor."

😡😡😡😡

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also, I want to see the video. Not the video with someone next to it making faces as they watch the video.

[–] Baguette@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

The only reaction video worth watching is someone from that profession reacting and giving additional context as to why it works or doesn't

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

“[video] REACTION!” And it’s just someone’s head in the corner as they raise a finger to point at the original video

[–] timeghost@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

hv;dw (hate videos; didn't watch)

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Conversely, some things should not be articles either. I tried looking up the temp for cooking chicken, and the amount of 20-minute reads out there to find out it’s 165° for chicken breast, is too damn high.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem in that case is SEO. What you need is a table of cooking temps or just a single number, but what ranks high is a web page that mentions "cooking", "chicken" and "temperature" a million times.

(Or be like Gen X and keep a cook book and a scattered assortment of notes in a drawer)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some thermometers have common safe cooking temps printed on them, its very helpful

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I can send you the article, but you're going to get two "would you like to subscribe" popups and dozen more ads sprinkled between every third sentence.

Like, I get that the video shit is annoying. But it almost feels like a competition in print media to make it worse.

Case in point:

[–] rbamgnxl5@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

Firefox reader mode FTW.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Ublock origin is your best friend

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cactopuses@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see the problem?

The article clearly demonstrates how the web became unreadable with a handy diagram...

/s

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As a xennial with ADD, send me the short, I'll watch it, hunt down the article, read it, then spend 3h down a rabbit hole to understand the validity of the claims and the bias of the news outlet, then I'll get bored and stop typing in the mid

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Millennial weebs read twice as fast as Gen x. Those fanmade anime subs can roll through quick.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TBF as a middle millennial, if you want me to click on the link you sent me, it had better not be a video

Whenever I've got the time to sit down and watch a video, it's going to be one of the million things I've already been meaning to watch.

An article can be consumed in way more situations

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm millennial and i hate those videos too

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone that's functionally literate hates those videos

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Hi, millennial here. Do you know why some millennials and a large portion of gen z suck at reading? Because their boomer/gen x parents didn't read to them as a child.

I grew up on my grandmother's lap, with her actively making reading fun and encouraging me to read along - I was reading, and comprehending, YA novels by grade 2.

My little brother though, who did not have a parent/grandparent to teach them to love reading, can't read worth shit. He was well into highschool before he even attempted a book like animorphs, and still didn't really comprehend the plot any better than grade 2 me.

So no, this is not a generational/phones bad problem, it's just another example of how boomers and gen x let their children down when it came to raising them with life skills, and then making fun of them for it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] totoro@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

Also: Please just give us the f'ing text instead of a screenshot of text.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Post a pithy hot-take in text? Nobody reads.
Post a screenshot of the same text from a social media site? That’s bussin!

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

This is the type of boomer engagement bait you'd see on Facebook. It's basically "UpVoTe If YoU aRe GeNx!1!1". Sure, the discussion here is higher quality, but it still makes me cringe to see this kind of stuff being posted unironically on a site I use.

[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the proliferation of videos as primary information sources is a huge part of how propaganda and disinformation became so effective and powerful. It's why we've done a collective nosedive into regressive politics and can no longer agree on the objective facts regarding.. well.. anything!

Information delivered by video tends to be trusted on the way it's delivered rather than the content itself. So we're thinking less critically about what we choose to believe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

If you see a millennial doing that then slap them and call them an embarrassment for me

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I am a Millenial and I prefer to read than to watch a video short from social media...

[–] leftist_lawyer 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Ummm" ... "yeah, ya know." "Ummm." "Jeeze, I hadn't thought." Scratch scratch scratch" ... supressed burp. "Sigh." "Hmmm....ummm." "Hahahahahaha."

Yeah, fuck all that. Give me the info: Issue. Rule. Analysis. Conclusion. The big video push is social media grooming for the algo.

[–] PillowTalk420@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I know plenty of people that "can read fast." Unfortunately, they don't comprehend anything they read until they slow the fuck down.

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

If my friend sends me a TikTok as a source of information, I'm gonna start questioning my choices in friends (/s but also sorta not)

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do wonder how much of video's proliferation is because we (in the US at least) fucked up teaching a generation of kids how to read. I'm told one of the dominant strategies for teaching reading was just bad. Well meaning people went all in on it, and then kids just didn't learn to read well.

You can read about it here, or listen to it as a podcast https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cornflake@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Zoomer here! Written articles are amazing for fast information, and I go to them when I want a solution to something I already have a decent understanding of. Videos are especially nice for something you haven't done before and want a real-time breakdown of the information.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›