this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
740 points (95.5% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2875 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but imagine how fuckin cool it would be if they were

[–] EllyEinhorn@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

It wood be really cool.

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly it's the other way around. Tree stumps are nothing but small rock formations. How disappointing.

[–] kubica@kbin.social 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those giant trees had to be cut because the earth was risking turning upside down from the weight.

[–] RePsyche@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flat Earth has entered the chat. :-D

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Considering the giant trees is part of flat earth yeah it was in here the whole time

[–] robotopera@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Giant earth theory is wild. I followed a guy on Reddit who had some absolutely insane videos "teaching" the subject. He also thought multiplication was a lie because if you do 5x5 by counting your fingers 5 times you still only have 5 fingers.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd say he's trolling but Terryology is apparently serious so anything goes, some people will gaslight themselves into anything.

Or maybe he's just amazing at the bit. He is an actor...

[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In every dumb movement you have the tucker carlsons that say shit they don't belive in, the trumps completely demented even lower iq and truly believe those things they say. And who ever the hell are the monkeys that whatch it.

[–] robotopera@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

If he was an actor he was performing for an insanely small audience. This guy was legit some of his videos were years old with less than 10 views.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But like... so what? What does this add to the flat earth "theory"? Like, okay there were really, really big trees once. Now what?

I know I'm looking for logic where it doesn't exist, but this really baffles me.

[–] robotopera@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'll see if his YouTube channel is still up so you can get the crazy sauce straight from the tap. Be warned, it is difficult to find a cohesive thought let alone any logic.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, all natural phenomena including checks notes the one where someone cut down a tree with a saw

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe someone cut down that mountain with a really big saw?

[–] Jode@midwest.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago

Erdtree O Erdtree,

Erdtree O Erdtree

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

🤔 This is honestly evidence that the universe is mathematical, that the shapes of trees and mountains are formed under similar mathematical rules despite being different sizes and materials.

Like galaxy formation and brain cells also look similar and that's ostensibly the reason why so it stands to reason why this would be a thing.

[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember someone posting a Neil Degrasse Tyson video and he was interviewing a guy talking about finding equations at the root of the physical world.

Neil seemed blown away, but isn't mathematics just our interpretation of the natural laws of the universe?

Like reading Cliff's Notes and then the actual book and saying "hey these are similar!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

fractals baby, it's all procedurally generated here in the matrix.

and there's a valid query regarding the world as simulation. but to take the leap from 'this geology shares properties similar to this stump' to 'damn, that was a big tree that grew out in the middle of this desert.... well that takes drugs kids.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

my brother thinks mountains are fossilised giants.

not kidding

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Bloody hell mate.. maybe he likes to rile you up? I mean, hopefully.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I had a friend that i guess I slowly drove away by always calling him on his bullshit and amongst the thousands of insane things he did and believed, he legitimately thought that there used to be giants roaming the Earth and he would argue this point intensely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you imagine the size of the chain saw!!?

[–] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Is a quasar not just a giant chain saw? Are spiral galaxies not just giant sawblades? It's giant trees all the way down, baby. Checkmate, Arborists.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow does anyone know where that first picture comes from? That mountain range looks like someone just jammed a bunch of glass shards into the ground!

[–] Flokman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that’s the Cerro Torre in Patagonia :D

[–] archaeoraptor@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like Cerro Torre. That specific image appears to be a mirrored version of a photo from an Outside article that features Cerro Torre.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the link and an interesting article!

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago

Flat earth wasn't silly enough?

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The line between creative worldbuilding and batshit insanity is surprisingly thin.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have three words if you love laughing at idiots like this: Mud. Fossil. University.

Enjoy.

[–] robotopera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Holy shit that's a deep library. I'm going in

[–] davidalso@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's fun.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, that's awesome. I've been thinking a lot about the scale of the universe and how cyclical it is.

Take a scaled out view of our solar system and then compare it to a molecules composition (the atom or group of atoms surrounded by protons and neutrons) and the similarities are just uncanny.

Like this image, what's to say that we aren't just part of a molecule making up the chemical composition of something far larger than ourselves. An ant has no concept of the vast empty space between the United States and Europe, we know that is the case between solar systems but our actual understanding of our relationship in space is limited.

P.S. look at the patterns of discharge of electricity in wood/paper/stone and then look at the patterns of the Grand Canyon. They're the same! And the Grand Canyon is the only formation we have that exhibits this quality, which makes it extra interesting.

[–] DroneRights@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Take a scaled out view of our solar system and then compare it to a molecules composition (the atom or group of atoms surrounded by protons and neutrons) and the similarities are just uncanny.

Nah, the planetary model of the atom is outdated. The quantum model doesn't look very much like a solar system.

[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The quantum model doesn't look very much like a solar system.

Not even a little bit, really. Quantum mechanics is in fact almost nothing like what school taught me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

so better science than most of modern physics

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m obviously not getting this one lol

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need to overthink a meme, but here's my guess.

They're correlating the shapes of the objects, implying some causation.

There isn't.

Ahh okay, that makes more sense. Thanks!

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could say that my formations have been rocked.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Just be happy that you don't get it. There are flat earthers out there who will say it unironically. Not sure if it's only flat earthers but I think so. It really is wild

[–] DroneRights@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Mariner: why do all caves look the same?

Rutherford and Tendi: cause they're all formed by... SOLUBLE MINERALS!

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Batman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

My dataset says there is a one to one relationship between mountains and stumps (n=3). Infinite-Power.jpg.gif

load more comments
view more: next ›