540

Donald Trump's campaign spokesman defended Trump using "vermin" to describe his enemies, while historians compared his language to Hitler, Mousselini.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 123 points 7 months ago

Don't forget that Trump is also a rapist

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

Also don't forget to mention it at every opportunity. The rapist Donald Trump must be called exactly that so people don't forget we're talking about a convicted rapist who for some reason is not a registered sex offender which, of course, doesn't mean he's any less of a rapist, which Donald Trump verifiably is.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

He's not a convicted rapist. It was a civil trial, not a criminal one. The trial decided that he did sexually assault E. Jean Carroll (but not legally rape, although the judge said it was rape despite the legal definition) but that resulted in a ruling for damages. The statute of limitations for a criminal trial had passed.

So he's not a convicted rapist, but the judge at his civil trial involving rape said he was a rapist. But that's why he isn't a registered sex offender.

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know all those details.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

No problem. I wish he had been convicted obviously. And I seriously doubt that is anywhere near the only time he's raped a woman. But like so many other things in his life, he's gotten away with it.

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

A jury if his peers still found that Trump was a rapist. The judge in that trial clarified that the jury finding meant that Trump was a rapist.

This was after the Trump camp claimed, after losing the defamation suit, that none of this meant that Trump was a rapist.

So the judge explicitly clarified that the jury had found that Trump had committed rape.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The problem is that calling it sexual assault doesn't make it clear that he penetrated her with his penis without consent. The only reason it's not "rape" is that it wasn't a criminal trial.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] 44razorsedge@lemmy.world 72 points 7 months ago

Does this mean we can openly call trump a lying, raping, Nazi?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago
[-] VintageTech@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

I like the cut of your jib

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 63 points 7 months ago

He knows exactly what he was doing, and he’s being rewarded with the attention he desired.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

In other words: "We know where we are heading, no need to remind us!"

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 31 points 7 months ago

What an ugly motherfucker

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Interesting that people only now realise that he's copying Hitler. MAGA already was a Nazi slogan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

I'm so tired of this POS getting attention again. And I'm not even American. The amount of stress he causes me... Please let this end...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Well trump is a dump piece of shit! Now we’re both calling each other names!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

The difference is that Trump has an (increasingly literal) army of thugs ready and raring to inflict violence on us "vermin," and you don't. Trump is not just "calling [people] names;" he's making credible threats.

Anybody who tries to minimize this with false equivalences is either dangerously naive or spreading disinformation.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I’m all for his REAL supporters proving it by getting TRUMP or MAGA tattooed on their foreheads. Problem with red hats is you can take them off.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago

Of course they did would anyone expect different? He's a fascist and knows he can get away with it. Backing down would be worse PR for him he isn't trying to please the kind of people who take offense to dehumanizing minorities.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Good lord, that thumbnail. Really captures the evil.

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 10 points 7 months ago

especially lately I havnt even seen a picture he doesn't look like a hateful angry maniac. how can someone like that be.considered for leadership. insane

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Well, that's deplorable.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesperson, responded to the backlash by calling critics “snowflakes” and promising that “their existence will be crushed” by Trump. In a statement to The Washington Post, Cheung said: “Those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their entire existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House.”

Cheung later clarified to The Post that he meant to say their “sad, miserable existence” rather than their “entire existence.”

Oh, that's much better. Thanks for the clarification!

In all seriousness, though, it's never a good sign when the clarification of a candidate going Hitler is to double down on the Hitler. There are going to be scary times ahead if Trump is allowed anywhere near the White House again.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

He did the same thing in 2016, clear use of what seemed to be at least Nazi adjacent propaganda, and he doubled down on it, got elected, are people still doubting he literally supports neo-Nazis?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 7 months ago

Wow, straight to "And if I did, you deserved it."

We're on the fast track now, boys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnoopPanda@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump‘s campaign is defending the former president’s use of the word “vermin” to describe his opponents and detractors after receiving backlash for echoing a term used by brutal authoritarian dictators like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

“We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections,” Trump said in a Veterans Day speech on Saturday after using the term in a social media post earlier that same day.

Because if you have a capable, competent, smart, tough leader, Russia, China, North Korea, they’re not going to want to play with us.”

The speech prompted reactions from historians, including John Meacham, who said Monday on MSNBC’s Morning Joe that Trump is “lifting” rhetoric from Mussolini and other historic fascists.

“On a weekend when most Americans were honoring our nation’s heroes, Donald Trump parroted the autocratic language of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini — two dictators many U.S. veterans gave their lives fighting,” Biden-Harris spokesperson Ammar Moussa said in a statement.

In a post to Truth Social on Monday, he wrote that those involved in the prosecution of his legal cases — namely Special Counsel Jack Smith, former special counsel prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco — “will end up in a Mental Institution by the time my next term as President is successfully completed.”


The original article contains 489 words, the summary contains 243 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

How does he even have a campaign? Who are these shit stains willing to work for him?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's so wild to me that the Trump experiment has gone on as long as it has. He's broken politics in this country. The GOP at least will never be the same. We let a rich yuppie real estate guy from New York city completely monopolize political power. As much as I can't stand the guy, I have to accept that almost half the country sees something else entirely. He speaks to something that people are desperate for in this country, Democrats would do well to figure out why that is instead of dismissing this guy like they have done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Hey guys you gotta defend free soeech rights for Nazis if you want to "preserve democracy" because if you dont then they might suppress your rights if they gain power....but they totally wont suppress your rights if you dont suppress theirs because they're a fair people

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
540 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4224 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS