this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
155 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24177 readers
2964 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, Trumpists have no idea how to actual govern, so to them, everything probably is an emergency.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Stop being fair; fascists don't deserve it. Their entire ideology is being unfair to you.

They know it isn't an emergency, they know they're lying, and they're doing it on purpose in order to seize power unjustly. Their disinformation must be opposed at every turn and they must be given no quarter.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

I agree with you. Outside of sarcasm, I'm tempted to apply this version of the word:

"We'll give you a fair trial, followed by a first-class hanging." --Sheriff Cobb in Silverado

I don't think violence is really the right answer to this mess, but I have to keep telling myself that. The hardest thing about facing down awful and destructive people isn't winning, it's not becoming them in the process.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Especially the shortage of diapers in Donnie's size..

[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"They did it for COVID, therefore we get to do a for everything else" - MAGA, probably

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Biden couldn't even forgive student loans, meanwhile Trump gets to dismantle the whole damn department for some reason

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

Well, Trump can’t forgive anything.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

It's weird how they can use Biden/Obama/The Clintons for so many things, including alternative histories.

I had a conversation with a dumbass magabrain that's in my life and he legit said he hopes that donvict will fix the "terrible Biden economy". This, after nearly six months of donvict doing nearly everything to fuck up an economy that was doing very, very good especially after having to recover from Covid. I told him as much and how I don't recall things being bad at all for my household prior to Jan 20th (nevermind looking at the actual numbers) and his response?

Well, he was doing okay, too, but it's possible not all the right people were doing okay, and many wrong people were benefiting under Biden. I didn't have time to ask what the fuck that was supposed to mean, but I sure have a few guesses....

These people will try to rewrite history of even a few months ago and when called on it, sheepishly have to admit that claim is bullshit (usually - the spokescreatures for donvict won't admit anything because they are paid liars, but everyday schlubs are not that agile at brazen lying in many cases) and then switch to some other topic or change the narrative to having the government suddenly needing to choose winners and losers in the "right" way. Usually choosing "winners and losers" is supposed to be bad, but this is something like "states rights". They don't really mean any of this shit, the base mostly just wants a white country that centers cishet white male xtian men, and the elites that run things just want the tax cuts and no labor movement that threatens any of their plans...

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

For sure, coal fired generators should be treated as an emergency. They’re slowly going away (in the US)/but our environment can’t take the pace. We need to treat this a lot more urgently, get totally off coal asap. I bet we could do it in only a couple years of emergency action.

I believe it’s mostly two states, and West Virginia always needs an investment

…. But they’re probably not thinking of it that way

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They'll just rebrand coal as 'Natural American Fuel Pellets' and double the price of energy.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They will also call them "Freedom Lumps" and sell collectors lumps for $47 each for MAGAs to put in their Christmas stockings

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Except that those chunks of coal will be imported from another country where there are fewer safety and environmental regulations while the trump's pocket the savings.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

Freedom Lumps fill the MAGA diapers

[–] altphoto 5 points 15 hours ago

Freedom cancer pills!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Trump administration officials also used emergency powers to protect coal-powered electricity generation. ... The recent flare-up relates to Secretary of Energy Chris Wright issuing an emergency order to keep open a Michigan coal power plant that had been scheduled for retirement. Michigan regulators and grid officials, however, deny the existence of an emergency or shortage of power.

The emergency order is particularly odd. Typically, the Department of Energy is responding to a request from the locality in question, but that did not happen in this case. This particular Michigan facility, the J.H. Campbell plant, had been deferring maintenance as it was expecting permanent retirement on May 31, 2025. It also had not been placing orders for coal to burn, and many of its workers had been reassigned, since everyone had expected the plant to be shut down.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

It's times like this, with this kind of phraseology floating around, that I think about the Poison Girls' track Crisis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlTJUaYo6Vk