this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
542 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24228 readers
3021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“As a Christian, I don't think you can be both MAGA and Christian,” one person wrote in the comments of the video.

Two weeks ago, Jen Hamilton, a nurse with a sizable following on TikTok and Instagram, picked up her Bible and made a video that would quickly go viral.

“Basically, I sat down at my kitchen table and began to read from Matthew 25 while overlaying MAGA policies that directly oppose the character and nature of Jesus’ teachings,” she told HuffPost.

In the comments of the video ― which currently has more than 8.6 million views on TikTok ― many (Christians and atheists alike) applauded Hamilton for using straight Scripture as a way of offering commentary. Others picked a bone with Christians who uncritically support Trump.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] selfdefense420@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

fuck off with that shit. too little too late. ACAB. destroy all religions for the future of humanity

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] somehacker@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

The Bible is also abundantly clear about being misogynist and homophobic (even in the New Testament). Skipping over those parts gives an evil book/religion a pass. Fuck Christianity.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 20 points 23 hours ago

its always been about power and control. A population in fear of eternal damnation is easier to manipulate.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

In the New Testament, that stuff all comes from Paul. Paul was a conservative asshole. He was the first evangelical Christian, in both the historical and modern sense.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Fuckin Paul, bro. Imo, evangelicals worship him as their savior way more than Jesus

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 23 hours ago

Yup. Also condones slavery.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The homophobia was likely a mistranslation. The misogyny isn't though. It's not evil in and of it's self. It's stupid and useful for controlling the stupid. Still fuck it but fuck the Baptists extra deep

[–] somehacker@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"Likely" is a pretty strong statement when scholars aren't in agreement (based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_1, I did not read a bunch of articles myself). Saying it's not evil when it advocates for evil things doesn't track for me, but it seems we're on the same page about Christianity in general.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I watched several of her videos. As an atheist I find her position refreshing.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

the problem with religion, and the reason it should be completely eradicated, is that you can spend your entire life trying to explain how one interpretation of the stone age holy book is "wrong," while the other person does exactly the same thing with you, and there is no valid proof that either side is "right." meanwhile people are killing each other over the whole thing. it's all such fucking bullshit.

it's time for the human species to grow up and stop wasting time (not to mention lives) with religion

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Meh. If social media served a purpose, to me, it was to show just how many dimwits are out there who will beg for someone to tell them what to do and how to act and what to think.

You can take religion from them, but they won't stop being gullible and lost, and they'll just fall prey to the next scumbag with no scruples that comes along, be it a politician or some other con artist.

The problem isn't religion - it's an excuse, a cover.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I agree in part. But most of these people are as gullible as they are BECAUSE of religion. They're taught from birth to follow unquestioningly, and to trust their feelings over evidence. (I know, I was one) Without religion, then indoctrinating children wouldn't be as easy or widespread.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They're getting indoctrinated by the fox news and qanon groups or sovcits or whoever gets to them first. It's not a question of if they get indoctrinated, but by whom.

Some will actually be capable of realising it and break free, but then you have the one actively opting into it.

At least the churches have discernable objectives, unlike many other groups operating in the cesspits of the internet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can do the same thing with philosophy or ethics. Check out The Good Place on Netflix or torrent. Chidi isn't much different from some religious scholars

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

"I think, therefore I am..." "...gonna eradicate large portions of humanity through violence"

-Descartes, full quote without omissions-

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

No True Christian
No True MAGA
No True Scotsman

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It’s all Christianity. Whenever Christians act horribly, a different group of christians always come out saying “they’re not REAL Christians “ how convenient. The thing is they ARE Christians, because you don’t need an official membership card to get in.

It’s a cop out to brush away these people as not one of you, but they are. These are the dregs of your religion, this is the end game to certain branches of your religion. You don’t get to brush them under the carpet and pretend they don’t represent you , cause they do. Own these people and fix your religion which often leads to this. Don’t just keep pretending that this isn’t part of Christianity

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

It's the No True Scotsman fallacy. Sorry, a plurality of Americans are megachurch evangelicals. Their leadership is in bed with MAGA, which makes them complicit.

[–] StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Religion is a cancer on mankind.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

That was one of the core tenets of Zoroastrianism.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Wtf is MAGA Christianity? Is that a new word for bigotry?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

It's Christianity but without the teachings of Christ.

[–] RampageDon@lemmy.ca 10 points 21 hours ago

Supply Side Jesus

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

So it's just Ianity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

It's easy to call it NatC.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

In the United States, evangelical Christianity is the dominant religion, and MAGA is part of their doctrine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›