Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
… would never let Tony take out a hit on Iran
She would have definitely continued to empower Israel to do it for her, though. We'd still be marching to war with Iran under her. And the humanitarian crisis in Palestine would still be happening. Nothing would fundamentally be different, except the people of america would be mostly asleep to it.
Nothing would fundamentally be different
The Democratic Party slogan. 
I don't think this particular scenario would have unfolded under a Harris presidency, but for a bit of a contradictory reason: Israel began striking Iran to throw a wrench into the renegotiation of the nuclear deal with the US (and the US government let it happen, these fucking rubes). Kamala, however, was far more hawkish on Iran and would never in her life entered these negotiations in the first place, thus not prompting this particular escalation to occur to begin with. Would Kamala have willingly and happily supported any strikes on Iran by Israel under any pretext, however flimsy? Absolutely. Whould this particular scenario have arisen? I don't think so.
Whenever Contrapoints gives a liberal take it has such big "Yass girl!" energy.
Al Gore would have invaded Iraq