this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
209 points (96.9% liked)

News

30682 readers
3198 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 88 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It is very telling that the big donors would rather try to split the democrat vote than rally behind a popular candidate.

IMO, Dems have to allow the new generations to finally have their say and invite fresh ideas, or fatally break the party.

If they keep letting the money work against their voters, they're choosing the latter.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The party has been fatally broken for a while; it's mostly a question of if and when the left realizes that and gets to work.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

FPTP will always lead to dysfunctional parties.

There are at least 3 "natural" parties inside of the Democratic, and at least 2 in the Republicans. At local level primaries can mitigate the issue somewhat, but a national level it will always lead to conflict.

[–] BreakerSwitch@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago

I'm pretty sure it's a known strategy of a handful of billionaires (the richest man in PA comes to mind, though I forget his name) to back moderate dems to shift the board to the right.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

remember- (large in this sense) donors are capitalists. they donate not out of the kindness of their hearts…

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 81 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Democratic elite shitting themselves at the prospect of winning an election.

The Democratic establishment is seriously onsidering backing either a corrupt sex offender or a corrupt trump ally over an energetic, charismatic young candidate with a platform that enjoys majority support.

The rich have two parties, people have none.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

We need to change that.

[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)

These Democrats would rather have a Republican than someone like Zohran. They're losing a generation. The next President will be another Republican if they refuse to see the writing on the wall.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 29 points 5 days ago

I will say that the inner party Democrats are absolutely not going to learn any lesson from this.

They will lose the 2028 and wonder who they need to blame outside of themselves. I've honestly tried voicing my concerns with the TN Democrat party, but LOL they don't give a bleep about anything from the State of TN.

I'll keep speaking my mind but shoot it doesn't feel like anything is going to move the needle with them.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

they will refuse. It really begs the question-- as the DNC is a private corporation is it even possible to throw all the bums out and bring it back around as a party of the people.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 39 points 5 days ago

lol, they put ol' Uncle Touchy up against a fresh face telling people what they actually want to hear and are shocked (SHOCKED!) fewer people want the wrinkled old sex pest?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Vote Blue No Matter Who, right?

[–] dinren@discuss.online 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, they have ranked choice.

So it’s: democratic socialist, not-republican, republican.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

That was the primaries. The general is FPTP.

So as always, it's anyone but a progressive.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not any more. I will freely admit that this last round of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory and letting the fascists win has broken me. I will absolutely and seriously consider voting 3p going forward.

Edit: and for what it’s worth, I can recall getting in some disputes with you on that topic before the election. You were right; I was wrong. I hadn’t realized we were already at that point sociopolitically, but we were.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

They should be fucking ecstatic there's this simple way to win elections with minimal funding but they are too far up corporate America's asshole

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Major Democratic donors — who poured tens of millions into a Super PAC for Cuomo — were having private discussions Wednesday about whether to back an independent run by Cuomo in November's general election, or rally behind unpopular incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who's also running as an independent.

Brain damage

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 15 points 4 days ago

Stop shaking your head about the shitty establishment and work to enlarge the leftist part of the DNC

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The dnc and the centrist democrats will bow their heads before the progressives or they will be cast aside into the dustbins of history.

They are just upset they didn’t get everything they want. They’ll have to get over it I guess and start voting progressive no matter who.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

They're still the wing of puma pac.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 5 days ago

Liberals being hypocrites, very smerprising.

[–] chicagohuman@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Minimal funding means not enough people got paid

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't exactly call this melting down and a few people aren't the "establishment":

On Wednesday, many Democratic lawmakers and officials either denounced Mamdani or notably declined to rally around him. Republicans — including President Trump — crowed about Democrats embracing a democratic socialist who has called for reduced police funding and sided with Palestinians in the Gaza war.

  • The top two Democratic leaders in Congress, Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, both New Yorkers, declined to endorse Mamdani even as they applauded his victory.
  • New York Rep. Laura Gillen, from Nassau County, called Mamdani the "absolute wrong choice for New York."
  • Rep. Tom Suozzi, also from Nassau County, said he had "serious concerns."
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If the top two Democrats in government aren't the establishment, who the hell is?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Ah, maybe. I don't like either one of those, Jeffries is a sell out and has been for a long time. I guess I just don't listen to them and consider them the mouthpiece of the worst of the democratic party. Bernie Sanders is more my speed and I consider him establishment.