172
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Does happiness have a price? For a majority of Americans, the answer is yes — but it doesn't come cheap.

About 6 in 10 of Americans believe money can buy happiness, according to a new poll from financial services firm Empower. Yet to achieve happiness through financial means, most people say they'd need a significant raise, as well as a big chunk of money in the bank.

Median household income in the U.S. stands at about $74,000 annually, but respondents told Empower that they'd need to earn roughly $284,000 each year to achieve happiness.

And as for wealth, Americans said they'd need even more in the bank to feel content: $1.2 million, to be exact, the poll found. Many people are wealthier than they were a few years ago, thanks to the rise in real estate and stock market values, yet the median net worth of U.S. households stood at $192,900 in 2022, according to the Federal Reserve.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago

And yet disability is at a whopping $914/month federally and you can't have more than $2k in your bank or they take away your food stamps and healthcare... a number that hasn't changed since 1974 and would be $13k if adjusted for inflation. I didn't choose to be disabled. I paid my taxes when I could work, to prevent suffering; but I'm now living with a family member and selling nudes to afford the rent, bills, vehicle costs, insurance costs, prescriptions that aren't covered, service dog expenses, etc.

[-] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have a disability as well, and while I am largely able to work I live in terror of taking a turn for the worse and becoming disabled. The costs are horrific and I'm just barely scraping by on what I work my ass off to make.

Sorry, comrade, chronic illness is just ass. Hang in there

[-] Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

If you can make a good wage for several years before you apply, SSDI will go up and won't be such a low average. Unfortunately, I was disabled after only a few years in the workforce and the most I made, even with a degree, was $15/hr. I wasn't making enough for long enough to get more than the $914 (the SSI limit). That's the best advice I can give. If you get SSDI, you're also allowed to get married without losing benefits. Those on SSI, if married, the income the spouse makes is considered your income and is taken out of your SSI.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

Money doesn't buy happiness. However, it can often buy time or a reduction in stress, which can help one find happiness.
I make a good salary and one of the things that buys my family is the ability to just do what we want to do, within reason. While we still watch our grocery bill (and goddam inflation in food prices sucks), we don't actually stress over it. We buy a lot of fresh fruit and vegetables and splurge on some name brands here and there (Kerry Gold butter is awesome). This means that we don't stress over "what's for dinner", other than planing out meals for the week. Because, that's smart and leads to less waste and better eating. We can also say, "fuck it, we're ordering out" and dropping $50-$100 for the family to eat isn't going to cause money issues. When we get to the "end of a paycheck" our main stress comes from only putting a few hundred in savings. And we actually have savings. So, I am not worried that the car is going to crap out and we're suddenly taking on tons of debt at usurious interest rates.

Has money "bought" us happiness? No, but life is a hell of a lot better now than it was when we were raiding the change jar to buy something to eat for dinner. Being poor brings a lot of stress with it, and that can make you unhappy.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago

Money is simply one of many ingredients needed to be happy. What I would say I need to be "happy" is:

  • A home in decent shape that I can comfortably afford, and with the autonomy to do with it as I please.
  • Good healthcare
  • A healthy retirement fund
  • Money for decent food
  • Enough to take 4 weeks/year of vacation

Is that too much to ask for?

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

In general, money doesn't buy happiness, but not being strapped for cash does. If you have a good budget, you can be low-stress and happy with a wide array of incomes. If you have a bad budget, even if you make a shitload of money, you will be stressed and much less happy.

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

owning a 1st gen MR2 would make me pretty happy, i have to say.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

The pop-up lights were always a damn cool style (though I'm sure the bills to fix them when they won't retract/extend anymore was probably what killed them).

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

they were made illegal due to pedestrian safety. it was literally just two electric motors. there are half a dozen in a single car seat today.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

It can’t buy you happiness. But it can buy stuff that makes you happy.

Like, not having to worry about the choice between rent and fiod, or car loan and electrical bill. (Not to mention all the other stuff that’s pretty fun, too.)

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know if paying my electricity bill counts as buying something that makes me happy..

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

ever been without electricity? Some homes, no power means no heat, no cooking, no internet. it's just a shell that's nominally warmer than the outside. Stressing about simply surviving is going to pretty much make anybody unhappy. so not having to worry about paying those bills... perhaps it's best to say, buying relief from unhappiness?

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah. Relief from unhappiness is a much better way to put it. Happy is not the same as not-sad.

Finding happiness in life usually goes beyond "having the bare minimum of my basic needs met".

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

When you have repeatedly had to choose between having power or water for a given month, not having to do that makes you very happy.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I think the removal of a negative stimulus is a different kind of emotion than the addition of a positive stimulus.

I get where y'all are coming from. I really do.

I still think it's a misrepresentation of what "Money doesn't buy happiness" means.

And yes, studies do show that money does buy (read: positively correlate with) happiness. Not just what this study seems to be reporting by asking people what they want, but by actually examining for correlations. It does seem to max out at a number far lower than a lot of politicians and C-suite execs are making though.

I'm not saying "Money doesn't buy happiness". I'm just saying that "Buying things that make you happy" is different from "Meeting basic human needs in the modern world".

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I don't think you're arguing against the concept or anything. I'd thought maybe you hadn't seen what people meant.

I can for sure understand your perspective.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago
[-] remus989@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Aww, niceness on the internet!

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Makes you happier than not being able to pay it.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Not-sad is different from happiness

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social -1 points 7 months ago

Buy a puppy

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

It can't buy happiness but it can buy an environment that allows happiness to flourish

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

“Having money isn’t everything. Not having it is.”

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago

To sum up what a lot of other folks are saying:

Money doesn't buy happiness; money mitigates misery.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 7 months ago

If money was no longer a concern, I certainly would be far less stressed and could actually have time to search for real happiness. But what I need to be happy isn't something money could buy.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

lol an 1800 sf shitbox that needs updates is 1.2m where i live.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

Median household income in the U.S. stands at about $74,000 annually, but respondents told Empower that they’d need to earn roughly $284,000 each year to achieve happiness.

$74k is a good wage for one person (and an okay wage for a couple) who lives in an area with a decent rental market, minimal college loans, a paid-off car, and good employer-supplied healthcare. It's when you start factoring in the actual costs of housing, cars, college, and healthcare - or adding in the cost of kids - that things become unmanageable.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Most of America, geographically, is significantly cheaper than people often think it is.

When you can get a 3br for $600, your median income doesn't need to be that high. Several states have a median income in the $40s - North Dakota is in the 30s, even.

These states are generally rural, as a rule, but they directly impact the national numbers.

If you just pulled cities of, say, greater than 200k people, I'm sure you'd see quite different numbers.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago

Most of America, geographically, is pretty far away from what people want to experience. Yes, rural is cheap, but there is a distinct lack of theater, variety of culture, and massive distances to anything other than outdoor recreation in those areas. It works for some people, but not for a lot of people.

Not to mention the lack of high paying local jobs. Sure, it is great for a technical person who can work remote and doesn't want to go to the clubs, but that isn't everyone.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Right but it does affect the median, which was my point.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

$1.2 MM seems crazy to me. With one sudden influx of $200k I could pay off literally every debt I owe, and would have significantly more money than I'd spend just living normally.

With $1.2MM I'd never have to work again, I guess maybe that's what people are aiming for?

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

With cost of living in a lot of areas they would still need to work to afford a home, but would have a lot more flexibility and an actual expectation of being able to retire when they want to with 1.2 million.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago

Many people are wealthier than they were a few years ago, thanks to the rise in real estate and stock market values, yet the median net worth of U.S. households stood at $192,900 in 2022, according to the Federal Reserve.

Isn't this contradictory?

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Many, not most

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Gonna leave this here for the 6/10 who are confused as to what brings you happiness. Pipe away bot.

https://youtu.be/vSQjk9jKarg?si=-av8hzAoixOc6QtY

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

I don’t wanna be rich. I just wanna get by without struggling for once.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

I just want to be able to stare off into the distance while pumping gas

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

I wanna go to the grocery store and not worry that the 'nice' brand costs ten cents more.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Give me a lot of money and I'll promise you I'll be happy as fuck.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I believe studies have shown that your happiness (and the "lot of" money) would last about a year before you end up back at your baseline

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

I like that my baseline is boredom instead of constantly worrying about money.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Something seems wrong with the result.

To paraphrase "people that earn some money, think they need to earn 4 times as much to be happy. They have never earned that much and never will. Also, they want to save an amount that at 8% return will pay them about what they currently get paid."

Maybe the survey takers don't know themselves and think more than they make now will solve things? Also, averages are likely misleading in this case.

[-] coolkicks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I thought the millennial aspirations were a bit extreme, but as a millennial I get it. We had the Great Recession, outrageous prices for college, home prices are out of control.

And I say this as a millennial doing well. We don’t even think about money day to day or paycheck to paycheck, and are saving enough to largely minimize or potentially mitigate our kids needing student loans. But I am still strategically thinking about money and what will happen when the next recession or financial calamity hits, or hyper-inflation wiping us out.

The cost to live has been trying to outrun our income our entire adult lives, so sure, fuck it, double our income then maybe we have a chance to sleep at night even when it’s going well.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Seems about right. I hope to retire with 2.5M in the bank. It'll give a pretty significant income unless I live into my late 90s.

[-] themeatbridge@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I'm hoping to send my kids to college in the next 15 years, so I don't ever expect to retire.

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 7 months ago

Money can't buy happiness but at least can buy financial education and with it you don't will need money to be happy 🤣🤣..

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
172 points (96.7% liked)

News

21693 readers
4440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS