this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
53 points (96.5% liked)

Asklemmy

49391 readers
565 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I get that anything is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. That's besides the point. My point is, beyond speculation, what do crypto coins represent?

I also understand that the value of the US dollar is being questioned almost as much without the backing of gold.

But what I really want to know is what is at the foundation level of Bitcoin that people are buying into?

I have a basic understanding of the blockchain, etc. I sold 1BTC in 2017 for $1200 when I thought that was as high as it would go. At this point, at over $100kUSD and rising steadily, what is the $ limit and what is that limit based upon? I thought it was based on the value of mining to check transactions but this seems... not worth $100k to me.

I've been thinking, the only tangible value I personally see in Bitcoin, because it's not really being used as legitimate currency, is for criminals. By now, there must be trillions of dollars in BTC acquired by criminals holding corporations hostage. When you've got people like Trump involved (either explicitly or by way of manipulation) with an executive order to establish a crypto czar, this suggests to me that he's creating pathways for bad actors to more effectively gain more wealth. These are the people who are most excited in Bitcoin, beyond speculation.

I mean, there's little to nothing on the up and up with crypto, right? It's a scam. Right?

Please, factual answers only. I'm looking for someone to dispel my speculation with genuine economics of the matter.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PresidentCamacho@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

It had the same value a stock without a dividend has.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the only tangible value I personally see in Bitcoin, because it's not really being used as legitimate currency, is for criminals.

Please, factual answers only.

In 2021, 0.15% of known cryptocurrency transactions conducted were involved in illicit activities like cybercrime, money laundering and terrorism financing

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sounds like the word "known" is doing some heavy lifting there

The assumption that bitcoin is only used by criminals is much less accurate.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You’re gonna have to give me a source for that buddy.

It came from here but this source has more detail.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that by total number of transactions or by bitcoin volume?

I copied that from Wikipedia which got their reference from through NY times.

For specific details, this is probably a better source https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/reports/the-illicit-crypto-ecosystem-report-2022

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Just like anything else, it's worth what people are willing to pay for it vs what people are willing to buy it for.

Currently bitcoin is just a digital commodity with a finite supply which makes it a good store of value if people continue to use it.

The thing is, there's nothing preventing bitcoin from tanking and becoming essentially worthless besides people buying it because the price is low.

If in a hypothetical future the bitcoin price becomes stable then it will become a valuable commodity. It's value is wholly derived from it's users and nothing else.

It's not very convinent for governments or large institutions to hold it in it's current form since it's too easy to steal without leaving a trace. For government use there is going to be needed some development to allow for government or Central banks to have complete control over the currency without giving that control away which I think might be possible. In that case settling international transactions in bitcoin as opposed to the dollar for BRICS countries might be an option which doesn't use the US dollar.

All the other uses IMO are pretty much fluff such as paying in bitcoin.

Bitcoin doesn't even attract criminals as it's traceable. You can easily tell who bought what and traded what. Since all the exchanges are KYC, no criminal worth their salt would use Bitcoin. Instead, they would rather use Monero. The only people buying and selling Bitcoin are people who want to gamble on it getting higher

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

In the same way that MLM and Ponzi schemes are worth something.

How profitable it is is directly proportional to how willing you are to fuck over everyone around you. To how much of an asshole you are.

[–] Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My views on it are the same as the DPRK. A tool used by capitalists that can help fight against capitalism.

[–] comrade_toaster@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you provide a source? I haven't heard that perspective before but it sounds interesting

[–] Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago

https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/03/16/north-korea-bitcoin-holdings-top-el-salvador-bhutan-after-bybit-hack/ basically, DPRK hackers constantly steal bitcoin from insecure exchanges or whatever. This helps them get around the genocidal sanctions the west places on them. It isn't disclosed what they use the funds for, but likely in trade with Russia and/or China.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The US dollar actually is tied to something of value: it's the format the us government will take their taxes in or else they will increasingly use their powers as a monopoly on fhe legitimate use of force until you give them what you owe

Crypto is only worth what others will pay for it. Which is why I don't own it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

not even fiat (heh) is worth anything if we don't accept it as store of value, let alone an electronic register on a digital ledger.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Bitcoin specifically? No. It's a janky prototype that should have been superseded a long time ago.

Crypto in general? Probably something. It's good for buying and selling illegal things.

Modern blockchain protocols dominate bitcoin in every dimension except market cap.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

The real answer is: It depends how you define value.

Can you make money with Bitcoin? Yes. Are you likely to make money? No Is the technology useful applicable? Yes Is it being used and applied ethically and for the good of people? No. Is it a 'store of value'? No, it's more like an extremely volatile stock or a lottery ticket. Can you use it like money? Yes Is there any reason to use it like money? Not really, not even among other cryptocurrencies.

Depending on which of these aspects of Bitcoin matter to you it will be more or valuable.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 52 points 4 days ago (8 children)

So you know how fiat currency is backed by nothing more than the fact the government says it's valuable and we all agree to that? Crypto is sort of like that except without the government bit

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

Except the lack of government AND the massive amount of pollution and resources waste.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Fiat currency is backed by taxation, which can only be paid in the very same currency that the taxer prints.
📺 Your Taxes Pay for Nothing

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

TL;DR: It's worth whatever a greater fool is willing to pay for it.

Bitcoin is a cult, therefore it's invaluable to the cult members. In reality they're all multi-level marketing pyramid schemes which is what the stock market has degenerated into as well. The former just has more overtly obnoxious shady unethical proponents. It's easier to succumb to greed, selfishness, and seclude oneself from the rest of society by simply buying something that confirms one's fallacy riddled beliefs than it is to question oneself and actively improving society with all of Earths inhabitants, ecosystems, and posterity in mind. Technologically humankind has made great strides, but mentally the majority still thinks like cavemen.

Crypto Cult Science

“Money corrupts; bitcoin corrupts absolutely. Disregarding all of bitcoin's shortcomings, a financial instrument that brings out the worst in people—greed—won't change the world for the better.” —https://www.arscyni.cc/file/crypto_cult_science.html

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Bitcoin has massive value as a tool to transfer money, anonymously, and through borders effortlessly. Its extremely valuable for money laundering, scamming, stealing, and dodging tariffs or raising money (see how much crypto is stolen by north Korea)

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Cryptocurrencies don't rely on a central entity and is the Lemmy equivalent to Reddit compared to the fiat currency. I like it and I like the technology but

  • Good luck at having a proper stable economy using only crypto. Cryptobros hate central banks but their policies ensure that a loaf of bread doesn't cost 3 times as much the next day. I'd rather have a central trusted authority than not having one
  • Bitcoin by itself sucks. It was the first crypto so it's the most common but it's slow, heavy and costly to operate and to transact on
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 days ago (5 children)

At its core, it represents an irreversible proof of digital existance. Blockchain is the only technology that can do this, and it makes it more valuable than you’d think.

Bitcoin itself has first mover advantage, and that keeps it on top. It’s hard to point to any particular feature of bitcoin that warrants this first place position, aside from pure decentralization of holdings.

The irreversibility of blockchain transactions is very underrated to most of us, but think about it… no bank or government, even with military involvement, can reverse a transaction or seize assets. For most of us in nations with sophisticated financial infrastructure and govt, this doesn’t sound like a big deal, but for the majority of the world, this is a huge deal.

It also represents freedom from fiat. Since the beginning of currency govts have used it as a means to extract wealth from the populace. Printing, confiscating, and controlling as it pleases them. We’ve historically used gold to hedge against this, and there’s even instances in history where govts have devalued and confiscated gold as a means of supporting itself. Bitcoin brings all the freedom of gold, with all the benefits of the digital world.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

There’s many defenses around a $5 wrench attack. But in the end, no, crypto doesn’t fix crime.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JASN_DE@feddit.org 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

My point is, beyond speculation, what do crypto coins represent?

Nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›