...he admit it!
So you agree you just want to be in power
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
151 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
593 readers
645 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
"Libertarian" "Government" "Run"
I don't think this person knows what words mean
"Me, personally, I can do whatever and I'm not gay" reigns supreme as the most coherent libertarian principle
it's the conservative idea that "there is an outgroup that the law should bind and an ingroup the law should protect" but the ingroup is just themselves individually
I just realized the point of this phrase is not that the person saying it isn't gay regardless of what they do, it's 2 separate statements:
"I can do whatever I want."
"I'm not gay."
I think they're linked, actually
If they're linked then it only really makes sense with a very broad definition of 'gay,' or else it's more of a hegemonic masculinity thing than a libertarian thing.
or else it's more of a hegemonic masculinity thing than a libertarian thing.
I mean, yeah
Upon further inspection, the OP of this tweet seems to be saying this as an argument against libertarianism. He's saying that libertarianism is an infantile idea you can only hold if you're the kind of person that would eventually come to the conclusion that a white ethnostate must first be established to make it work (if even that). He says that coming to that realization is what made him snap out of lolbert beliefs, actually.
But the dude is a radical "centrist" chud of another variety. Thomas Sowell type, don't expect the government to fix your own problems, clean your room, etc.
(why did he phrase the tweet that way if he isn't a libertarian anymore? I don't know!)
Parable of The Sower really is prophetic
Horseshoe theory confirmed, if you replace libertarian government with communist egalitarianism, white ethnostate with dictatorship of the proletariat, and Christian patriarchy with vanguard party, they’re saying the same thing
"Freedom is when a powerful government gives me special treatment because of what's in my pants and then slaughters everyone else for being weeeeeeeeeeeeeeird!"
This is why I'm not afraid of "big government". Yes, I want a powerful ruler to keep criminal psychopaths from murdering for their own sick pleasure. If that means society is less "fun" or "free", so be it.
I was a Ron Pauler and now I’m a left-wing extremist
I've been left as long as I can remember, but I supported Ron Paul as the harm reduction candidate due to his foreign policy. The racist newsletters and other shit made me more anti-libertarian, tho. If he's the best they've got, what the fuck are the rest of them like?