this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
421 points (99.3% liked)

politics

25033 readers
2604 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 129 points 1 week ago (2 children)

MAGAts supported a child rapist. I’m just surprised this doesn’t bolster their support for him.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The conspiracy wing/Q cult of the party have spent a lot of time trying to "root out" the global pedo cabal. Dump telling them to shut up about Epstein is a direct betrayal of what they've believed for years now. We will see if any actually peal off.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The conspiracy wing/Q cult of the party have spent a lot of time trying to “root out” the global pedo cabal

Well, these dipshits thought Taco was going to bring about "The Storm" and arrest Hillary, Podesta, Obama, etc...and that children were being trafficked out of the basement of a basement-less pizza parlor, so, let's just say they have a very active imagination and have next-level abilities to tie themselves into pretzels with their "logic" about the real world.

Just the fact that they believe the real source of pedophilia would be primarily Democrats, and would not involve someone so obviously creepy and slimy like Taco - a guy that is on record saying what he has said about his own daughter - tells you a lot about their reasoning capabilities.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Its because they don't and never have cared about children. They just want to hang/lynch people they don't like while feeling righteous about it.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Being aphantasic, I admire their imaginations.

I just have to sit here in reality and take it.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago

They legit had no clue Trump was involved. That's how much of an echo chamber they had. Now the faction that cared the most about the Epstein files is clashing with the rest.

There are almost certainly high level donors to the Democrats in there, too, and probably Bill Clinton and a few other politicians. Naturally, the left in the US is happy to have them released, anyway, but MAGA doesn't think in those terms. They think everyone to the left of Hillary is brainwashed into supporting Democrats, and would never support releasing the files. That's why they were able to pretend it had nothing to do with their side.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whaaaa.....

Black won acquittal in 1991 for Smith, a nephew of John F. Kennedy, on rape charges and later married one of the jurors in that nationally televised case, Lea Black, who later became known as a cast member on “The Real Housewives of Miami.”

He also represented Epstein during his 2006 criminal case on charges of soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and Black helped secure his 2008 plea agreement that was challenged by two victims who said the deal violated federal law because they were never given an opportunity to object to it.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right? How does one go about dating a juror? They're not ever alone with them.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“Hey there, Juror number 4. What’re you doing after I help this rich politician get away with rape?”

Probably creamed the whole juror’s box right there. Married him and watched him do it again for Epstein.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The 80-year-old trial attorney

ah huh

big mystery here

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Y’all know if Trump had a massive stroke right now, a big part of his base would start blaming foul play, not the fact that he’s old as shit, has visible cardiovascular disease symptoms, and exercises via golf cart.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump's campaign really shot themselves in the foot by making Epstein one of their top issues.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Eh, more like constantly spouting spurious claims that will inevitably bite them in the ass. This one just happened to stick.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Haven't "maga" (nonsense word with no real meaning) realized that Taco has HEREBY ORDERED them to stop talking about ~~Trumpstein~~, I mean, Epstein?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What do you mean, nonsense with no meaning? Millions are using it with fairly specific meaning.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah. MAGA has always been a symbol of white supremacy. It has pretty specific meaning. The dude walked down the escalator and started calling Mexicans criminals and rapist. He said on a major TV network with half the world watching that immigrants are eating people's pets.

MAGA is white supremacy. MAGA is Nazi shit. Always has been.

Dude said that immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our nation".

Might as well be saying the 14 words.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

But it’s like calling someone’s class a DPS. It’s just… off. Even if everyone accepts “you’re a damage per second and I’m a healer.”

“Make America Great Again is seething.” Uh huh.

Everyone knows what these things mean. But we could have done better.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You and I might know it means the set of deplorables and their awful views on race and gender, but when they use that term, just what policies and principles do they want others to believe that "maga" stands for? I mean, it's not 100% white people in the group calling themselves "maga", so other than sucking up to Taco, what are the core principles that are the supposed cover story to pull in POC, women, LGBTQ and so on?

Same goes for other terms they use that sound like baby talk....like "maha". Just how do they plan on making people "healthy"? What metrics will they use? Does "healthy" include things like reversing the recent trends in maternal mortality? Or is it just about lining the pockets of Big Wellness for RFK? No, we just get baby talk like "maga" and "maha" and very little discussion about real goals, real metrics, etc...I'm just tired of all the baby talk that passes for real definitions of anything. Nailing down what any of "maga" and "maha" are supposed to stand for is like nailing jello to a tree. It's like when Orwell talks about losing the language. This mostly passes without comment, too, by the way. We are just supposed to accept terms like this...

When the likes of MTG claim they are the "real" maga, and those that don't want to release the Epstein files are not, how can anyone really argue for either side, since "maga" means nothing at all other than loyalty to Taco, and the real meaning that most normal Americans know is behind "maga" (xenophobia, homophobia, misogyny, theocratic, etc.) doesn't really enter into releasing information about pedos for or against. They are for it if they think it will mostly damage Democrats, but against releasing it if it would hurt Taco...

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The MAGA people gave it their meaning. That is all that matters, even if we do not understand/share/know/... that meaning. What you said sounds like someone saying "x is not a real word", completely ignoring that language constantly changes. I reply to you because you are not just wrong but also damaging. You have to acknowledge that they exist and really believe that stuff. It is not made up nonsense to them and as a result of their actions also not for anyone else. Ignoring them like that can only hurt us more.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not saying to ignore them. I'm just saying more people should press them on just what "maga" means.

As a for instance, does "maga" support or oppose tariffs in the amount and in the way that Taco is (illegally) doing them? Would that position be the same if it was anyone else other than Taco doing it?

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Food for MAGA thought…Didn’t Joshua Dean also die from a “sudden illness”?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Too bad they're already in office.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I don't think the magats are competent enough to actually put out a proper hit. And the TLA assets who ARE mostly would have been fired because they worked the russia beat or whatever.

Still. All for the qanon conspiracy folk to get riled up against their handlers because they are too stupid to critically think through anything "conspiracy" related.