"Seedorf said he’d “take a bullet for” Trump and that Trump was the only politician he’d commit such an act of self-sacrifice for. Of the former president, Seedorf said: “He’d do it, too, for everyone else.”"
These people are mentally ill. It would be sad if it weren't so terrifying
I feel it's important to point out that gullible and mentally ill should not be conflated. He's an easy mark for Trump's rhetoric, a sheep eager to be fleeced. That doesn't mean he has a mental disorder.
I think imbecility counts.
I agree.
Stupidity is based on a lack of knowledge or awareness
When you are aware and enthusiastic about what you are doing and saying while pretending to be ignorant or misinformed .... it's malicious.
I disagree. Ignorance is based on a lack of knowledge or awareness. Stupidity is when you double down on what you think you know, and you're not willing to be proven wrong.
Ignorance can be cured. Stupidity is too-often not.
Well, gullibility is a symptom of histrionic personality disorder, but only one of many
Yeah, the only person Trump would take a bullet for would be his own reflection in a mirror and even then I'm not convinced. (This is, of course, assuming that Trump was temporarily granted the physical ability to jump in front of a bullet.)
He's told his followers that he's being indicted to protect them and they've bought it hook, line, and sinker. They really think that, without Trump, the Democrats would arrest all of them for possessing classified documents, financial fraud, trying to overturn an election, and trying to incite an insurrection.
Meanwhile, in the real world, the only reason they would be indicted for any of these things would be if there was evidence that they did any of this. For some, there is (e.g. the January 6th Insurrectionists), but for your average MAGA Republican? Nobody is going to file charges against them.
But still, they are convinced that Trump is protecting them somehow.
Trump would let an infinite number of people take a die if he got a fish delight a second faster. His supporters are not connected to reality.
The newlyweds saying "there's no better place to have a honeymoon" made me almost choke on my sandwich.
My brother in Christ, she should be having her guts rearranged for a week straight on a beach somewhere. Not front row to this asshole.
I give that marriage 4-5 years tops.
As long as those two have bigotry, racism, misogyny and a shared will to worship a cowardly dictator in common- nothing will ever stop them.
Do people need to worship and idolize something? I don't get it. What has captivated you? Why this rumbly sack of skin?
People like this seem to need to have someone who projects confidence and strength (at least as far as they see it) to follow. It eases their feelings of insecurity, which conservatives prey on.
I have reason to think that religion works the same way.
Some people do. For some of us we approached it rationally and safely keeping what we know at the forefront. Others fall to their knees at the sight of a con man
That some is lookin' more like 2/3rds.
He makes stupid people feel smart.
He’s turned his campaign events into something that has more in common with a Bruce Springsteen concert than a Harry Truman whistle-stop tour.
Bruce would be horrified at this comparison. Couldn't they have said Ted Nugent instead?
I figured it was a way to get people whipped up for the idea of death squads.
It's so he can bask in people cheering for him, I swear one of the videos I saw just had him smiling contently like he was a lizard enjoying the sun. It's getting his narcissistic supply, the rest is secondary as long as the people love him and yell about it.
Leave Bruce out of this motherfucker.
Keep his name out of your voice
Circlejerks rarely are.
At this point? This shit ain't new man.
Is this photo taken at a high school basketball court?
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News