politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Israel lost the public referendum. Accept this and get with the program, or prepare to lose elections (preferably in the primaries)
Israel's PR machine has a stranglehold on the democratic party leadership. It's a key part of their strategy depth - because if this American unconditional support for Israel is independent of which party is in power. They're going to do everything possible to maintain it.
They should be nervous by now.
Isn't the goal of Zionism to form an ethno-state? That right there is my number one problem with this ideology. Is that any different then the KKK? Just you know, with Jewish people?
Ethno-states were all the rage in 19th-century Europe. Everywhere they got into power, they oppressed religious and ethnic minorities and in some cases resorted to ethnic cleansing. The usual result is a deracinated one-size-fits-all national identity based on some self-serving myths about the dominant group, with resultant loss of diversity in the face of coerced conformity.
And now you have Castilians putting the boot to Catalans, Basques and Galicians, Serbs shitting on Bosnian Muslims, Croats and anyone else who's not Serbian, everyone fucking with Roma people, Germans in the 20th century murdering Jews, Turks murdering Armenians and expelling ethnic Greeks, and so forth ad nauseam.
The Zionists are no different in this regard, except perhaps that more effort went into constructing a Jewish national identity after than wide cultural divergences that occurred in the Diaspora-- for example, reviving the Hebrew language, which hadn't been in household use among Jewish people for over two millennia (for example, people in Roman-occupied Palestine spoke Aramaic or koine Greek).
And if it hasn't been made abundantly clear: I despite ethno-nationalism and regard it as a proto-fascist ideology that has caused untold harm. Only the few countries that decoupled ethnicity from national identity (such as Scotland and some of the Northern Tier countries) have avoided becoming brainless dystopic hellholes.
You have my vote.
And my hacks.
They're nationalists, yes. Specifically early Zionists wanted to form a Socialist State.
That is, they're National Socialists.
Well at least these pro-zionist pieces of shit are willing to out themselves so we know who they are.
One day they will always have been against it tho
How long do you guys think people like Jeffrey Epstein were blackmailing U.S. politicians for Israel?
20 years? It probably went both ways.
Known top Democrats Eileen Filler-Corn, Abigail Spanberger, and Tim Kaine. I mean, there are plenty of rabidly pro-Israel top Democrats, but none of them are in this article.
The emphasis on "Zionism" is a little bit weird, too. I've seen Bernie Sanders be accused of being a "Zionist," because he doesn't want Israel to be destroyed. I mean, I guess that's... true? Maybe? "Zionist" seems like something you can apply to a huge number of pretty reasonable people by that definition. It seems like kind of a textbook way to start to throw mud at a massively pro-Palestinian person, and accuse him of being anti-Palestinian, through cleverly dishonest use of language.
I don't want Israel to be destroyed. Am I a Zionist?
Edit: I looked up a little more about it. This Palestinian state congressman, who is a Democratic committee chair, has been talking vigorously on social media about the evils of Israel's most recent "war" since October 2023. It only turned into an issue with this specific post, because the language means one thing to him, but a very different thing to some people who are reading it, and so they objected.
This is his message that drew the condemnations:
“One day, everyone will have always been against this genocide. After 22 months of the most horrific crimes, there is no doubt that Israel is conducting the most evil cleansing in human history as we fund and watch it play out minute by minute.
Much love to so many of my Jewish friends who have stood up from the first weeks of this horror to say this is not in our name. We know that this was never about religion, rather a supremacist ideology created to destroy and conquer everything and everyone in its way. This is Zionism.
Zionists yearn to be the only victim and deflect from the evils perpetuated in its name. Instead of calling for an end to genocide, Zionists have bastardized antisemitism making the world less safe for my Jewish friends.
There is no middle ground in this supremacist mess. The rights stripped from Palestinians for decades are being stripped here now. The concentration camps in Gaza are being built here. Zionism has proven how evil our society can be, and sadly we are beginning to experience it here in our great Republic.
Now is our time to rise up and stand on the right side of history.”
He's talking about the Zionism that is perpetrating the crimes in Gaza. It is your choice to focus on a "not all zionists" take, and it is your choice to focus on the crimes being talked about. In my opinion, just like "not all men" is (at best) a silly response to legitimate grievances about rape culture, the "not all zionists" take is also (at best) silly in the face of apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing.
because the language means one thing to him, but a very different thing to some people who are reading it, and so they objected
Or they're acting in bad faith.
Certainly possible, most politicians are, I think. I was just saying that you wouldn't have to be some nutty apartheid-supporter to look at Rasoul's statement and have some objections to it.
Fun fact, recognizing Israel as a country had wide support from antisemitic groups all across the US and Europe.
It was seen as a solution to get rid of the Jews once and for all. Just deport them all to the Middle East so that they're someone else's problem.
Using the same loose logic could easily be used to say that Zionism is antisemitic. It's the kind of stupid logic that conservatives use all the time to make the facts fit their feelings.
Makes perfect sense.
Almost as if you can't look for morality or amorality in broad categories, and you need to look at what someone's actually doing (or advocating or whatever), and be specific.
Almost as if you can’t look for morality or amorality in broad categories
Some broad categories are beyond the pale. For example, there's no moral way to implement an apartheid state.
Absolutely correct. So anyone who's doing that (or supporting it, making excuses for it, whatever), that's real fucked up and they're a bad person. I should have clarified, that type of broad category I'm fine with.
What I was saying is that someone who has been tirelessly advocating for the US to stop funding Israel, showing photos of the genocide and starvation on the senate floor, introducing votes to defund Israel, showing up at protests, all that kind of thing, if you manage to introduce a category of "Zionist" into the conversation, and then say "Well he's a Zionist so he's supporting genocide," that's a stupid way to reason. That's what I'm saying about broad categories. That type of broad category (using imprecise language to strategically make it sound like someone's supporting something they're not supporting) are useful tools for getting people confused.
I’m not surprised, but I am disappointed
Putin and Netanyahoo need to vanish, they are a fascistic blackmailing blight on the world
And Putin's flunky Trump should fuck off too.
Sorry, Democrats are evil. Did you not read the article?
Trump stays. And all that ethno-state bullshit really comes to the fore.
While those men are unquestionably evil, if it wasn't them it would just be some other unquestionably evil person. They're a symptom, not the disease. I'm not disagreeing with you, they should absolutely 'vanish'.
Zionism is, by definition, a nationalist ideology.
I think a lot of people do not understand that Zionism actually does have a specific meaning and ideological underpinning spanning the last 150 years. It is not simply the contention that this place over in the Levant should be called Israel and have a bunch of Jews there.
I think what Rasoul wrote was pretty measured and accurate, apart from calling the present actions the most evil cleansing in human history.
The objection from Kaine at least seems to hinge on Rasoul's use of "Zionism." You can see where there is miscommunication in Kaine's quote:
Tim Kaine, one of Virginia’s two Democratic senators, declared: “I forcefully reject any claim that Zionism — the desire of Jewish people to have a state of Israel — is inherently racist or evil.”
So if Kaine thinks the desire to have an Israeli state is Zionism, then Rasoul lambasting Zionism is going to feel like an attack on the existence of Israel.
So White Christian Nationalists wanting to have their own ethnostate and exterminate non-whites is bad, but Jewish Nationalists (Zionists) wanting to have their own ethnostate and exterminate non-Jews is ok?
The one-ethnicity, one-state idea is intellectually and morally bankrupt. It only works if all out-group members are either oppressed, expelled or exterminated.
Personally, I wouldn't care at all if a terrible government like Israel's is destroyed. I don't mind that at all. It's not worth saving. Those who commit genocide deserve no quarter.
I'm not against the people of Israel, just their stupid government. Much like I'm for the PEOPLE of the USA but our government can go fuck itself.
I’m not against the people of Israel, just their stupid government.
Most of the "people of israel" support most actions by said government.
Most that are against the genocide are only because they want their kid-soldiers to come back to their families.
Look at previous governments, they've never been benevolent towards Palestine and when they tried their Prime minister got shot dead by one of their own.
Sure there are israelis that oppose the genocide on humanitarian grounds, but that's a slim minority (and probably mostly lives elsewhere).
they've never been benevolent towards Palestine and when they tried their Prime minister got shot dead by one of their own.
That’s really glossing over a ton of fascinating stuff, but all of it’s instructive.
Fuck Israel, genocidal scum!
Democrats need to focus on this country. I hope all those bribe checks cashed. Its clear they are not working for their constituents.