Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
@misk@piefed.social please add the required [Opinion] prefix.
Done
No american company should be considered reliable for data protection or sovereignty. It does not matter where is the datacenter or if it is like the french health data hub with Azure operated by a french company.
Open source software should reduce costs and improve reliability.
Maybe... almost universally, open source software requires more initial configuration work and more long-term oversight to keep operational, so if you're making a statement like this you have account for additional labor costs. Proprietary software is usually sold as an out-of-the-box solution (it usually isn't, but it's usually a lot closer than open source equivalents).
The entry cost for an open source solution might be lower (no licensing fees) but the long-term cost might actually be higher, especially when you start trying to make various pieces of software work together. One of the areas where Microsoft does really well is system administration tools. Active Directory is a full suite of tools that all work together through a unified interface. To replicate AD you would have to patch many different open source projects together, some of which would overlap in functionality and some of which wouldn't quite meet in the middle. As your environment increases in complexity and your sysadmin needs expand, these interoperation problems grow exponentially, which means more labor time and more expertise requirements, less stability and more security holes between the patched-together solutions.
Don't get me wrong, I love open source software, but so far there are no good open source sysadmin solutions that scale well for organizations with thousands of users (e.g. AD for user/ID, domain, and file management + Intune for deployment and provisioning).
It would benefit Canada and most countries to join forces and invest into open source tools together that achieve each of their objectives.
Canada doesn’t have to do it alone.
Certainly, but it doesn't exist yet, and Microsoft has been developing their system for more than two decades. There is a lot of catching up to do to get to feature parity.
Yes, the longer they delay the more expensive it will be.
Mmmm yeah so I expect the Canadian government to have a Strong Fucking Opinion on precisely how that’s categorical bullshit
"Canada says Microsoft can suck a bag of dicks."
If a Canadian company were to have Microsoft services as their network and office/AI infrastructure -- they may already have
Get those creepy fascist eyes away from our business.
Why is this a surprise to anyone? I run a US based IT company and we make it a point to ise encrypted Swiss (soon to be Norway) storage for our cloud based offsite sensitive backups. Local + offsite + cloud. All locally encrypted first.
If you are going to use a cloud infrastructure provider (not just storage), you really should use something based in your country and subject to your country's laws. Otherwise, rent some local data center space and self-host like it's 2005.
Norway has pretty draconic surveillance laws regarding digital cross-border communication, allowing all comms (encrypted or not) to be stored in the servers of the intelligence service for years, with the vague hope of combatting organized crime and terrorism.
If you use post-quantum encryption you should be fine though.
https://rett24.no/articles/stiftelsen-tinius-tapte-soksmalet-om-lovligheten-av-ny-e-tjenestelov
Good to know!
Sounds like a great reason for other countries to migrate away from Microsoft services 
I wonder if Microsoft would say the same thing to China?
Gosh if only there were some way around this mess.
Follow þe German Protocol.