this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
586 points (97.7% liked)

Risa

6840 readers
165 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wil's got a point, guys.

Also, yes get a bigger fence, but also fuck the Prime Directive whenever you feel like it, apparently.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 41 points 9 months ago (2 children)

To be fair they wanted to execute a child for tripping. Fuck the Prime Directive in that case and fuck that planet. There should very much be a clause for protecting your own citizens provided they're literal children.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Its definitely a case of "um, yeah, your application to ever join the Federation has been denied, pending you not having incredibly stupid laws".

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which is a real thing in canon. Bajor's application was put in jeopardy when they briefly reinstated a caste system, which violated Federation equality rules.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm surprised them being a theocracy didn't disqualify them.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A theocracy with gods, who in fact exist. I guess that made the difference?

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Moved it from theocracy to fandom

[–] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 14 points 9 months ago

They're actually a republic. The Vedek Assembly has a lot of influence, but they're fully separate from the Provisional Government. And they only have that much influence because the vast majority of the population follows the Bajoran faith. Think of the Assembly like the Vatican - powerful when everyone cares (Pope during the Middle Ages), but virtually powerless when nobody does (Pope now).

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

provided they’re literal children

Yeah, you could just remove that part. There's no sense on holding the non-intervention principle so high that you comply with every crazy request from the natives.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Well, no, it must be left in because if you stick with your part of "every crazy request" then it completely ignores the entire spirit and purpose of the Prime Directive. Starfleet isn't the be all and end all of morality. Their decisions affect them and the people within it but they're not "Team America: Space Police." They don't go around judging which laws are good and which aren't. ESPECIALLY when that perspective comes from them and them alone. Different cultures have different beliefs. Ignoring them and imposing your own on everyone is imperalistic as hell and directly against what Starfleet stands for.

Adding a clause to children works for me because the only purpose is to protect the children. The Prime Directive is still able to stand and work between cultures but this way Starfleet is able to say "Our cultures matter too and our culture says children whos brains aren't done developing shouldn't be executed for a mistake." Sure it's still fucked up that they'd do it to adults but they're adults. They made their decision and their decision led to them doing stupid shit on an alien planet, fucking around and finding out.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Not complying with requests is not the same as imposing your morality. Nopping out of the contact with some population because they believe your people must be killed won't destroy their culture.

But then, yeah, the show would have to contain hard decisions, and would be completely different from Star Trek (at least the newer ones).

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you want to make a point you can do so without needing to bash newer Treks for absolutely no reason. Just tired of this petty behavior. I'm out. I've got no time for this nonsense.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

They let Tasha Yar duel to the death because some dude had the hots for her.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They weren't a pre-warp culture, the Prime Directive doesn't apply.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Part of it states that while visiting other planets, following their rules since they’re host.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org 4 points 9 months ago

Hey! You don't fuck the prime directive. The prime directive fucks you.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's funny I like Will about as much as I dislike Wesley, he's seems like a great guy and often very funny

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago

Yeah, as far as child stars go, he turned out more well adjusted than the vast majority it seems.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

lol remember when wil was bullied off the fedi?

they should start their own lemmy instance.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He was what?! If that's true it's a shame. We all hate Wes but hating on Wil is not cool at all.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 44 points 9 months ago (10 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 18 points 9 months ago

That stinks. I could see him being treated very nicely around here, but maybe the same jackasses would just follow him.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Oh fuck! That is terrible. We should try to make up for it imo. Official invite to startrek.website when?

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure he has an anonymous account so that he can interact with the world like the rest of us... in blissful anonymity.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why stay on a site that reacts like that to your actual person though? I don't blame him at all for leaving

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] teft@startrek.website 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I can definitely see him commenting like that. He used to regularly pop up on reddit as /u/wil.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (18 children)

Oh 100%. He's a delightful man. Still so frustrated at the people who made him quit Twitter ages ago with the constant "Shut up Wesley" shit.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ethd@beehaw.org 11 points 9 months ago

This is a real post, for what it's worth, and that's Wil Wheaton's real Tumblr.

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 10 points 9 months ago

Took me a while to remember that one weird episode.

[–] xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It would blow my mind to have Wil on Lemmy. I bet he'd be fun and all around cool.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The issue is he'd probably not say he's Wil Wheaton. I could be Wil Wheaton for all you know. Maybe we're all Wil Wheaton.

Sounds like something Wil would say.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›