One item per bill.
This didn't have bipartisan support. This wasn't debated. Neither you nor I had any representation whatsoever on this issue, it was proposed by an obscure lobby group and someone tacked it onto something that actually mattered.
Who actually wants to buy a breathalyzer as a required option on a new car?
I'm seriously concerned about my car not starting or turning off while on driving. Think about that Maui wildfire, what if your bac was just over the limit? Do you deserve a death sentence because your car won't start?
And any system that can disable your car can be hacked or abused by the government.
And what about "distracted driving?" Fool, I'm just looking out the windows?
Not to mention how expensive that shit will be to install in every car.
Yup, install and maintain.
I wonder what insiders are getting kickbacks for this.
Each feature added to a car raises the price by more than it costs to add.
Me. I'm getting kickbacks. I'm gonna find investors to open up a school for people to learn how to build their own car from scratch!
Fuck with me government!
I admire your enthusiasm.
Horrible idea. False positives are gonna get people fired.
Can a car be disabled by pouring a cup of vodka through the window?
Or by having a sufficiently drunk passenger?
I'm worried because I use hand sanitizer in my car.
Gonna carry around a spray bottle of booze to prank people.
Breathalyzers don't test for alcohol. They measure metabolites from alcohol
Great intentions, but I'm a bit worried about how the non-contact breath detection will work, if you're sober and giving your wasted friend(s) a ride home from the bar. BAC detection by touch might be better, if they can make it work that is.
Seeing how cars with Super-cruise have eye tracking, why not roll impaired & distracted driving into one safety package.
Eye tracking has become a reliable neuroscience tool for identifying the eye movements that are linked to impairments caused by alcohol use disorders. For example, a machine-learning model has been developed to detect alcohol intoxication based on a person's eye gaze and eye closure. (From Google's generated cliff notes)
Disabling a vehicle if the driver isn't looking at the road for x seconds might be a bit drastic. I could imagine e.g. muting the volume if not at the very least glancing at the road every 2~3 seconds. Would piss off a lot of people, then not long thereafter teach them to pay attention to where they are going.
I'm putting electric tape over any camera inside my house and vehicle. I'm glad my vehicle is older.
What, like a breathalyzer in every car?
"technology that would automatically test a driver’s breath for alcohol and stop a vehicle from moving if the driver is impaired. The driver wouldn’t have to blow into a tube, and a sensor would check the driver’s breath.
Another company is working on light technology that could test for blood alcohol in a person’s finger, the group has said."
I like the idea of fewer drunk drivers on the road a great deal, but I'm not sure I'd trust auto companies to handle that kind of data responsibly
No worries, someone will have a workaround before it's even out. But it'll make cars more expensive anyway.
🧤
I don't trust them to implement the functionality successfully.
So now we can see who has a profit incentive to control US policy on this matter.
Meanwhile Mazda is claiming ownership of information about their customers' sex lives!
New Mazda owner here. I wish I knew exactly what metric they were using to gather this info. I would make it think I was fucking EVERY time I start the car.
Your phone calls. Through the Bluetooth.
So what if the passenger is drunk? This seems like an awful idea
Welp, guess I'll just have to start smoking crack.
Picked a good day
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.