this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
633 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18933 readers
2795 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rivermonster@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

What are they reforming into and were? This type of domestic terrorists don't just suddenly get educated, and find ethics, and morals.

The roaches scurry when you turn on the light, but they're still there breeding and growing in numbers. Gotta get an exterminator and actively root them out.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 55 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Per the article:

There's evidence some Proud Boys are decamping to neo-Nazi groups. I'd argue that the Proud Boys are impacted by the same forces that are causing Moms for Liberty to falter. Republicans bet big into 2022 on far-right groups, but instead, the GOP underperformed in the 2022 and 2023 elections. The backfire effect is reducing enthusiasm for this new breed of culture warriors.

[–] rivermonster@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apologies for skimming, and thank you for helping me read. LOL. #selfFacePalm

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for at least skimming; it's more than most people do

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's true. I usually dive into the comments to see if the article is worth my time and energy. Or see if the bot already reduced it by 70%. 😅

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

Legal consequences hurt authoritarian movements, hence the reluctance to impose them.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cool, how 'bout some more legal consequences?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or, you know, the actual legal consequences defined by the law instead of slaps on the wrist for trying to overthrow the government.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 34 points 8 months ago

As an abolitionist, I look forward to ponderous think pieces about the horrors of the prison industrial complex starting to appear in right-wing publications.

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They're only consequences until Trump gets back in and pardons them all.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or we keep the orange skid mark dude from being elected again

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aka - Prosicute criminals.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

His ilk has been BODIED in every election against the softest most mild candidates. He's got no shot bro.

The hype for him has really died off and most of the sorta Trumpers moved away. He's done and the Republicans are too. They will rebrand the next few elections and try to find a new strategy to continue. Lindsey Graham knew what he was talking about when he said his infamous quote

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 8 months ago

He's currently the leading R candidate. Barring a miracle, he'll get nominated. Any sort of complacency by the electorate will lead to him getting in again.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Polls say he's neck and neck with Biden right now. I didn't think he had a shot in 16, then he won. It's way too early to call this. Fight until the last minute.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Polls by whom, asking who, with what methodology? If it's cold-calling people to ask them who they will vote for you can bet that nobody under 60 is answering.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

I hope you're right. It was damn near 50/50 in 2020 though, I see no reason to expect different now. The people turned off by trumps legal issues already weren't voting for him.

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 7 points 8 months ago

The very same Lindsey Graham that was flat on his flaccid yellow belly, licking as much maga boot as he could fit into his purty little mouth?

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What's the infamous quote?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not the one you're asking, but they probably mean this one from Twitter.

If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it. - 5:03 PM · May 3, 2016

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 months ago
[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Just a reminder that the "rise" of the proud boys could not have happened as it did if it wasn't for Joe Rogan constantly defending/promoting Gavin McInnes (FOUNDER of the proud boys) & his terrorist gang (which he knew was a terrorist gang while defending it).

(& then Daniel Ek paid Rogan 200 million to do this & promote anti-vax shit on Spotify exlusively).

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Scum needs to be cleaned and washed down the drain.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

"First they came for the Proud Boys, and I did not speak out, because fuck 'em."

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I wonder... Is there an commentary increase in the population of white supremacists in US prisons?