203
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

Mortgage interest rates have nearly tripled in the span of just a couple of years amid inflation fears and strong economic growth.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago

After rising for 10 consecutive quarters starting in fall 2020, the median U.S. home sale price has now declined for two straight quarters, to $416,100, according to federal economic data. That is still $87,100 above the quarter just before the pandemic, or an increase of 26.4%.

A person who buys that median-priced home with a 20% down payment and an average interest rate would have a monthly mortgage payment of about $2,300.

Any 1-3 folks wanna go in on a house together since it’s going to take a min of 2 full salaries to buy a home these days?

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Real Estate Corporations goals include blocking home ownership and forcing Americans into a rental only market, similar to Germany.

[-] matter@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Germany is a terrible comparison here. Home ownership in Germany is about 50%, true, much lower than the US' 65%. However, the majority of those rentals are apartments rather than houses, since even small towns are highly densified, very unlike the USA. There are many state landlords which provide rentals at a very attractive price; it's rare for people to spend more than 30% of their post-tax income on rent. Furthermore, there are extremely strong protections for renters, restrictions on rent increases, and they can renovate their apartments as they please. That's very different from what American real estate corporations want.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The United States isn't building houses; it is building apartments.

[-] matter@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That's great but the percentage of people who currently live in single family houses is much greater in the USA than in Germany.

If only the USA was building some solid laws protecting tenants...

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Really is that how Germany is? And all this bullshit about inflation it is called Corporate Greed and we need to be singing it to rafters. Fucking greedy corporations making record profits while wages stagnate.

All raising rates do is continue to make it impossible for average American to own a home.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

it is called Corporate Greed and we need to be singing it to rafters. Fucking greedy corporations making record profits while wages stagnate.

That's like complaining that mosquitoes suck blood and carry disease. It's their nature. If you don't like it, the only solution is extermination.

[-] brambledog@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, this was the outcome that was predicted when they allowed real estate brokers to also be property managers.

People wonder why starter homes havent existed on the market for 25 years and the answer is because nobody builds them, and when they do go up for sale, real estate agents are sending them the way of clients they already represent as property managers.

Why sell a house for 3% commission just once when you can sell it to somebody you are already partnered with and then make a 5% comission every month for the rest of your professional career while maybe only putting 15 hours per year worth of work into the unit?

Pretty much every issue in America comes down to the partnership of banks, real estate agents and landlords.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Interesting, I didn't know that about Germany. I'll have to look into how that is working out for them, seeing as probably quite a lot of people my age and younger won't be able to afford to buy.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

Not sure where they get that $416,100 is a decline. That looks like an all-time high.

[-] Blooper@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Worse. The US is building suburbs.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

$26000/year doesn’t sound that ridiculous for the average priced home. Obviously that won’t get you anything in a high COL area but if you’re somewhere else that seems manageable.

Gets easier over time as well since wages should rise over time and your payment should basically stay the same.

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

All right let’s talk through this a bit. Let’s say you earn like 90K a year.

Uncle Sam takes about ~25%ish to make things simple, so we’re looking at 67,5K take home, so $5625 monthly. But you’re doing as the logical advice says and you’re paying 5% into your 401K since your job matches it, and it comes out pre-tax, so recalculating, you’re at $5250 a month take home. But wait! There’s also healthcare to pay, which has medical, dental, and vision paid separately, post-tax, which we’ll say is around $250 a month, so now we’re actually down to $5K take home.

A mortgage that comes to $28K yearly would be something like $2300/month, so we’re down to $2750 for everything else.

Now, assuming you’re between 25-45, you’re a millennial who likely hasn’t been able to save up 80K for a 20% down payment, so you’ll be paying mortgage insurance, but you’ve got a great credit score, so you’ll be adding about $400 a month for the PMI. Then there’s property taxes going straight into your escrow account, which we’ll say is around $400 to make things simple.

Then, you’re going to have your homeowner’s insurance, which might be around $150 a month, plus you’ve bought in an actual neighborhood, so you’ve got a little HOA fee of $30 a month.

Now, we’re down to $1720 a month after we’ve covered taxes and just having a place to live. This is where we get into the fun budgeting items.

Basic utilities (electric $80, gas $50, internet $90, water $30, trash $20, car fuel $40) come to around $310/month. You’ve then got your mobile devices ($100), maybe two streaming accounts ($25), and then accounting for things you pay yearly (Xbox $5, Office $8). You likely had to pay for the move into your new home as well as a couple of newer furnishings on a credit card, so we’ll assume just some base card debt of $300/month. Plus since you’re a millennial, you’ve likely got a student loan you’re still paying ($200/month). Overall, we’re around $950 just living in this house, which brings us down to about $770/month at this point.

We haven’t yet accounted for food and amenities which can vary widely. A nice food budget that allows for a couple meals that can be made at home these days will run a single person about $100 a week. Amenities can range anywhere from haircuts to tampons to sandwich baggies so you can bring your lunch and snacks to work, and then if you’ve got one small cat, you’re adding in litter, food, and pet insurance. If you’re allergic to grass, like I am, you’ll need to pay for lawn care, too which can add an additional $100-200. If you’ve got a car payment, you’re adding an additional ~$400.

Let’s assume that your meals, amenities, and car payments eat up that remaining $770 a month. If you are ever too tired to make dinner one a week, you’re already going over budget. If the 15-year-old water heater goes, you’re looking to go into debt to cover that, and if you do something like get married and have a kid, the hope is that the spouse is bringing in another $90K because childcare is so outrageous, one of you would just be better off staying at home with the kid. If property taxes go up, the funds going into your home escrow are going to make things even tighter.

Could you make your $2300/month base mortgage work if you’re making 90K/annually? Yeah, with a very tight budget and having none of the more asinine homeownership issues, it’s more or less doable. That said, there’s just not a lot of people in the 25-45 age bracket that are earning that 90K and the average is coming around to $2300/month, and this is all assuming you can get a bid accepted when there’s some corporation planning to rent the property who’ll offer 20% over the asking price.

TL;DR: $28,000/year is ridiculous.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I couldn’t survive anymore without dual income. It sucks. The only thing I can think now is if you’re not married you need a roommate to even afford that house. Didn’t use to be that way.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I appreciate you typing this out because I think it's a realistic representation of what a typical millenial homebuyer would go through. I experienced much the same as I am a millenial who came in with 5% down in a high COL area before interest rates plummetted.

My original reply was to a user who quoted the article saying that the $2300 payment was for a buyer with 20% down. That immediately frees up your $400/month PMI, which makes the entire thing FAR more manageable. I would also suspect that many millenials that are in considering buying a home have already paid off their student loans and credit cards so that's an additional $500/month. Freeing up $900/month makes this much more doable. Add in a second salary of a spouse, or rental income from a roommate and it's more comfotable still.

I'm not at all saying that home prices are anywhere near reasonable, just that it can be done in the hypothetical scenario laid out in the article.

[-] mayo 1 points 10 months ago

It's doable but the requirements are basically people who I would consider to have 'made it'. It's not really accessible for middle class when only the top end of the middle class have access to the whole package. People below that line can afford it, for a ways down the rung, but they need to chip away at the lifestyle until it is essentially living just above the poverty line.

$600 groceries, a car, streaming services, double income salary, house, vacations... those are well off people by today's standards.

[-] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Not that this doesn't suck for current home buyers, buy it's worth keeping in mind that this is still fairly low on a historic perspective. Rates through the last part of the 20th century were often in the double digits (https://www.freddiemac.com/pmms). They dropped to around the current level in the late 90's and started tanking in the early 2000's. And then fell off a cliff in 2008. The Fed has been trying to get rates back up again ever since, often with negative results. At the same time, raising rates is one of the few tools the Fed has to keep inflation in check, and it needs to be used, lest we end up in the same situation as Turkiye with inflation upwards of 80% officially (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63120478). Erdogan has very helpfully provided a great case study in lowering interest rates while fighting inflation, he chose poorly.

[-] astrsk@artemis.camp 44 points 10 months ago

The difference is that the same house in 1990 at 12% still only cost $150k. Today at 7% it costs $1.2m

Source: the house I grew up in, county sales records.

[-] charles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 points 10 months ago

Right, these people are so quick to "well akshually" they completely ignore the inflated house costs since which layers more unaffordability on top of already unaffordability.

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

150k at 12% is $1543/mo; in 2023 dollars, that’s $3609/mo. 1.2M at 7% is $7984/mo.

Over the same time period, the S&P500 has gone up by a factor of 13.6x - if you invested $150k in 1990 you’d have $2.04M today.

I’m not trying to make a point - I just thought this was interesting.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

There's only a handful of areas where that level of appreciation happened. There's about as many places that 150k house is the same or less because it's a crime ridden neighborhood now, or there's no economic activity in the area anymore. The average is more like 2-3x increase in the last 30 years.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Home prices were much lower.

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

How does this make housing more affordable for the growing population?

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

In theory prices should go down as a result but the market is just like "lmao".

[-] blarco@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The opposite is happening. Everyone with a 2-4ish% mortgage is holding onto it for dear life so supply is super low which is causing housing prices to continue to climb. Can't blame those homeowners. Even if you sell your house for some inflated amount, you need to buy too and then you're stuck with a shifty mortgage rate.

[-] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

This is my position now. Even if I sold I wouldn't be able to afford what's out there right now anyway.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah there was an article that said national averages are down or slowing and maybe in the midwest but where I'm at a house purchased in early 2021 is evaluated at 30% more than purchase price. Copule that with interest rate rises and refi or buying that property doubles the monthly payment.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It doesn't. The solution is to start building and the best way to do that is ban zoning.

It's a byproduct of controlling inflation. The Fed will stop raising rates soon and start lowering them once inflation is under control.

If the fed did nothing, then inflation would continue to be 7+%, which would be equally bad for affordability.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
203 points (99.0% liked)

News

21700 readers
3195 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS