Cool. Let's see the legislature's browser histories.
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
953 points (98.1% liked)
News
23376 readers
1850 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My money says this guy can't even close his closet door anymore for all the skeletons.
Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, loves talking about his creepy spy app he and his son have on their phone that alerts the other if they visit naughty sites. So the writers of this proposal and all that vote for it would be happy to put the same program on their devices and computers, right? And tie that straight to a public feed we can all see? Great Great.
See when I read this story it isn't really that bad.
They believe porn is bad and use the app to keep each other accountable. I don't really have an issue with that. You do you.
But when they start trying to enforce that view through the government it's obviously not okay.
Aside from it being creepy as hell to do that with your son (who probably didn't have a say in the matter) this is a massive national security risk. Spyware on a Congress member's phone? Not a great idea.
load more comments
(8 replies)
It's creepy because it's his son, and he clearly is only doing it to control his kid.
You think the dad doesn't have a second device that's dedicated to wanking?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm sorry, I didn't know we lived under Sharia Law.
It's hilarious and ironic that Christian nationalists hate sharia law whilst wanting their own brand enacted.
They don't hate sharia law because it's abhorrent. They hate sharia law because it's not Christian based.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
🤔
Sex dick? Really Oklahoma? Are you guys OK?
They want to ban porn because it might tempt those who desperately want to be one of the straights.
But seriously, that congressman is so scared of being gay that they want everyone else to give up porn so they won't be challenged by easy dick.
load more comments
(5 replies)
I'm in Wyoming. There's only ten of us here. The goth search was mine. The rest didn't bother with PornHub after I explained that "bear sex" wasn't going to give them the result they were expecting.
Idaho's "dildo ride" absolutely tracks. I have been wearing a Bad Dragon cap for weeks (it's an amazing hat) and it was a ~50 year old woman on the Idaho side of the mountain who recognized the logo.
EDIT: I am not joking. The caps are sick.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(33 replies)
That guy watches so much porn
I don't want to engage in slander, but just extrapolating from previous conservative projection, that guy has a 15 year-old Honduran boy chained in his laundry room.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Let's take bets on who's getting caught first! Drag queens or some god-fearing dude??
Don't pretend for a second itll actually be enforced against the in group
Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I wish I didn't live in my COMMUNIST blue state where I can freely watch porn, read books, receive healthcare, feed hungry kids, breath clean air, turn around in driveways without getting shot and an abortion if I or my 10 year old daughter gets RAPED! I would MUCH rather live in a Red State where it's only legal to shoot homeless people, go to church and breath fumes from the coal plant next door unless it gets too cold and I freeze to death!
load more comments
(2 replies)
This guy is nuttier than squirrel shit. Total christofascist.
https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1734792445789884779?s=20
Besides banning porn, he wants to ban no-fault divorce, and ban abortion with no exceptions. He called COVID vaccines a"mark of the beast", called for the jailing of Fauci, and the virus was engineering by Bill Gates to decrease population.
Please consider posting Nitter links, so it doesn't give Musk a single cent in advertising by using privacy focused Nitter: https://nitter.net/DustyDeevers/status/1734792445789884779
load more comments
(2 replies)
Taking bets on how long it takes (not if, but when) this man is hacked and found to be absorbed in the exact thing he's trying to ban.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is like... Middle East religion police stuff.
So what do you think? How many of the politicians pushing for this are sexting with children?
The Venn diagram is a circle
load more comments
(1 replies)
Proof once again these delusional religious people need to fuck off.
The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.
Ok then, every piece of sexual content I produce or consume is in political protest of this specific bill. That should hold up in court. Bust one for Dusty!
load more comments
(8 replies)
Land of the free, home of the American Taliban
I love watching our clueless citizens just allow this descent into fascism. Who knew it would be as simple as just not teaching kids what the word means.
would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.
So you get get around it with a whiteboard in the background that has a math equation on it. Kinda like you can get around the swimsuit ban on twitch if you have an inflatable pool with water in it in the background.
load more comments
(6 replies)
We really need a law where any politician who wants to vote to ban something has to first disclose their own relevant actions.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Both of those are constitutionally illegal.
Let's ask the Supreme Court what do they think.
...
They're on a private plane with a billionaire. Will get back to us later.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
view more: next ›