this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
335 points (99.1% liked)

News

23311 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The complaint, filed in a U.S. District Court in Texas, said a proposal by activist investors calling for the oil giant to cut emissions faster would not create shareholder value.

Exxon Mobil is suing two activist investors to prevent their proposal calling for emissions cuts at the oil giant from going to a vote of shareholders.

In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on Sunday, Exxon accused the investors, Arjuna Capital and Follow This, of abusing the process for proposing shareholder votes to advance their priorities with votes “calculated to diminish the company’s existing business.”

Arjuna filed a proposal in December for a nonbinding resolution that urged Exxon to accelerate its plans to reduce its carbon emissions and expand the scope of the emissions it measures to include its suppliers and customers. Follow This joined in support of the proposal shortly thereafter, according to the complaint.

The proposal “does not seek to improve ExxonMobil’s economic performance or create shareholder value,” Exxon said in the complaint, but is instead “constraining and micromanaging” the company’s operations.

Non-paywall link

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 76 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The entire problem in a nutshell. Why won't these shareholders think about shareholder value!?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 30 points 10 months ago

we know you own a part of our company, but fuck you. what a complete scam.

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The invisible hand of capitalism gropes us all, once again.

[–] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

One dry finger checking their oil even, one could say.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, that's not capitalism, that's rampant stupidity. Imagine how much fucking money these companies could make, if they invested the same money the do for oil in to synthetic stuff, the potential is unlimited and with the CO2 Tax in most other countries, Oil is going to shit the bed crazy. They are afraid to change the status quo, regardless if it would be the smarter, economical decision.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It doesn’t improve ExxonMobil’s performance literally today, but it does when, you know, the world doesn’t end as fast. Literally “think beyond today”

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Have them pretend they produce coal instead of oil. Now you have 2 choices, keep doing what you're doing (and end up where coal is now), or actually diversify into more green energy and stay sustainable long term. Staying around long term seems like a better return to me.

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The executives don’t care; their incentives are for short term profits as that’s how they get their bonuses and pay hikes. They would likely dismantle the company tomorrow and sell it for scrap if would mean they would end up pocketing the majority of it. (Obviously considering the size of the company and its importance, and pesky legal regulations, they probably wouldn’t get away with scrapping it but the point is they would if they could)

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 9 months ago

This is also driven out of a requirement to always maximize returns for shareholders, even if long term it doesn't make sense for the company.

It's almost like capitalism isn't designed with the company or workers in mind, and will devour both for another cent. 😜

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Amazing how "increase shareholder value" is in direct opposition to keeping the shareholders, their descendants, and modern civilization itself viable.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Capitalism thinks one quarter at a time man you can’t expect them to care about next decade, much less descendants

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 40 points 10 months ago

I feel like long term growth absolutely works towards shareholder value.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 38 points 10 months ago (4 children)

When asked for comment, ExxonMobil cried and shit itself and said it wanted its Daddy. The active judge then disrobed, revealing his withered body and began to breastfeed ExxonMobil while saying "there's my special big boy, Daddy won't let the mean shareholders hold you accountable ever." When the judge's back was turned, reporters noticed a tattoo across his shoulders which read "Their Delicious Souls" with tattoos of dozens of screaming babies under it. One member of the plaintiff's council then shouted, "oh my God! Those aren't tattoos!" Everyone began to scream and run, but before they could exit the courtroom, scores of souls cursed in eternal damnation leapt from the judge's back and consumed victims in horrible ways that resulted in scarred visions this reporter will never unsee. "Amateurs," claimed ExxonMobil, who then shitted themselves one final time and the awful sludge rolled down their legs and killed an entire Brazilian tribe just before choking a bunch of ducklings for fun.

[–] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

I know it's getting harder and harder to distinguish between what's real and what's fake. So I'm just going to accept that this is absolutely 100% what happened.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow. What the fuck is that from??

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

My ass. I pulled it from my ass. You may quote it directly, it prefers being credited as "TheFartographer's Swampy Fun-Hole"

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

All credit directly to your ass, good sir. May your ass continue to wreak literary mayhem until this joke of an oligarchy fails (and maybe for a few days after too)

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

It's as if you were channeling William Burroughs

[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Wow, what a ride of a comment. Thank you, TheFartographer's Swampy Fun-Hole

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Bloody hell. Your ass should create its own paper, it would be better than 90% of the media out there.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago
[–] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need to get rid of the big corporations. Just… all of them. Maybe even the idea of corporations as a whole. Get them gone, they’re actually killing human civilisation as we know it. We’re going to actually be Cyberpunk if this keeps up.

Drastic step, I know; and one that’s… unlikely, to say the least. Just saying things how I see it.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

We're going to wish our world was like cyberpunk if these businesses get their way.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

But that 25% headcount cut sailed through.