648
Hate when it happens (lemmy.kde.social)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 105 points 5 months ago

Don't worry, some hero without a cape will appear for you and seed that bitch! (wait, that sound better in my head).

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 42 points 5 months ago

Once or twice I've gone and found another source for the download, copied it into my torrents folder, forced my torrent client to re-scan the file and started seeding it.

Watching a thousand other clients tick over from 99% to 'seeding' is weirdly gratifying.

[-] duplexsystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 months ago

Not all hero's wear capes. Also just so you know there's a script which does this automatically

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 24 points 5 months ago
[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Phew, thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 80 points 5 months ago

Check the files included in the torrent. Sometimes the folders include a little readme or something that people set to not download.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why do people do this? Readmes and nfo files take up literal kilobytes.... even over hundreds or even thousands of downloads, at most it's going to take up a few extra megabytes of download/storage, they're not saving anything at all. And it can be nice when the nfo includes all the releaser's original encode settings and stuff.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 70 points 5 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 months ago

Yea sometimes I'll exclude the .nfo from my downloads. Thankfully the tracker I'm on now disallows any files that aren't media in their uploads.

[-] Norodix@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago
[-] FatAdama@programming.dev 12 points 5 months ago

And can contain some fun ascii art.

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 11 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TooLazyDidntName@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago

Could be me seeding the entire torrent except the readme file

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

Lmfao. Hilarious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 59 points 5 months ago

I've done the math for how long it'd take to randomly guess the last several kilobytes until something checksummed correctly.

I was not pleased with the answer.

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago

That would put those crypto miners to better use at least

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

You know I never thought of that.. but yeah that would be a good very very very very large number.

Like throwing puzzle pieces in the air and getting it to land completed.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

On average it'll take 2^(n-1) guesses to reconstruct 2^n bits, so... depends on how many hashes / sec you can do.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago

Let me save you some time: not enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 5 months ago

What's even worse is when a torrent is stalled at around 94%, there's exactly one seeder with a full copy in the peer list, but he has fucked up networking rules (or an intentionally choked upload because he's a dirty leecher) so that despite having an open connection in the peer list, they never send any data...

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

This seems to happen alot. I always wondered if it is really a peer or some weird spoofed peer that just tries to give you hope before crushing your dreams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

What do you consider choked? I know a lot of people do not have good upload speeds regardless of what the download speeds are.

[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

Choked, as in turned to 0b/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago

Want to be honest here, my real pet peeve is that it shows 100%. Ever. At all. Let alone when it hangs there... That's just insulting.

If it is 100% complete, I should not be waiting for anything. If I were ever developing an operating system I would never allow for 100% to display on a progress bar. 100% means it's done. We advance to the next screen. Do not display it. It makes no sense.

[-] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago

I do often desire a "click to continue" option, especially helpful for asynchronous tasks. Start a render, and when you get back it says 100% without you having to look at the output folder, for instance. I get what you mean though, it certainly should say 100% unless it's totally donezo. Probably lazy rounding errors in some cases (Microsoft products are the worst at showing accurate progress bars)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Im 101% done with 100% progress bars

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 38 points 5 months ago

Part of why I moved to usenet.

Everything always downloads at full speed (limited by disc write speed in my case), so if there's missing data you find out about it within a min or two instead of after 3 days of trying.

Usenet also includes parity data so you can rebuild missing data to an extent.

[-] calmluck9349@infosec.pub 17 points 5 months ago

Till you're missing that one article.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yup, point is I find out much much sooner and can move on to a new nzb. A single ~15gb nzb takes 5min max whether it succeeds or not. I'm never ever waiting on slow seeds.

Multiple providers can improve availability, but I've seen no need. Everything myself or my users have requested has been found and downloaded within 25min, including re-tries. Typically it's about 15min from user request to 'available to watch' email notification.

Worse case I can fallback to torrents, but I haven't had to yet with over 31tb out of usenet alone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 months ago

If it's a video, you can probably still watch it

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

It's usually just an nfo or srt file that one seeder has deleted

One time I added a subtitle file to the download folder, renamed to the same as the movie file, and the download percentage jumped to completed

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago

I wish people would adopt torrent V2 because that one missing 500 byte file can make the video unwatchable. With V2 each file has it's own sha256 hash and can be checked and shared individually. It would also improve torrent health.

[-] droolio@feddit.uk 10 points 5 months ago

The next best alternative would be BiglyBT's Swarm Merging feature (which works similarly, and amazingly well on v1 torrents considering it only stores a precise file size instead of a hash in Vuze/Bigly's own DHT). I've been able to 'complete' numerous separate torrents where availability was <1.

BiglyBT already supports v2 but dunno if Swarm Merging works with such torrents yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

You should get your money back!

[-] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

Force Recheck.

I have a lot of these just go to 100% after checking the downloaded files.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yarr you need some wind in yer sails matey

[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 months ago

What does the 0.1% of the file contain anyway, if it's a video and most of the data is there it might be either playable or if not it probably might be able to be repairable so it can play, albeit with minor corruption in the damaged part.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 14 points 5 months ago

Video files can be played with as little as 5% downloaded, so long as the header and footer are complete

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Definitely had some luck with this with videos. Hit or miss, but worth a go

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

BitTorrent has partial seeding. So if someone extends a torrent with some files, the original one can still be used for seeding.

Another reason for the last bit being the slowest is because populars chunks are downloaded first.

[-] LodeMike 10 points 5 months ago

What is it? If it’s a video it’s probably fine.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 5 months ago

No it's not. You try wating for an hour with your dick in your hand edging while waiting to see some serious... ahem... debates over global warming.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
648 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

52502 readers
228 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS