this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
58 points (74.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26890 readers
2625 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

Dunno. But fascism is what happens after it succeeds.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm leaning into the right of this meme more and more with every passing day

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The dystopian cyberpunk future William Gibson tried to warn us about.

Spoiler: We're already living in it.

"The future is already here, it's just not evenly distributed."

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

The sky the color of a TV tuned to a dead channel has never looked prettier though...

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 33 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Fascism. It’s fascism.

Economic and social collapse dislocates a lot of people. It dislocates people who think they shouldn’t be dislocated, because they played by the rules. They go to church, they had a job, they’re patriotic to their best understanding of the word.

Then, in their minds, something must have changed. It might be the immigrants, or the Jews, or the gays, or weirdly drag queens for some reason this time around. Then someone comes along who validates them as victims and promises a return to their historical glory days.

The last paroxysm is the election or ascendency of a far right populist who elevates that narrative. They promise to restore national pride and return to traditional values, and to return the nation to its roots which had made it strong and put them on top.

It’s happened multiple times around the world, and there are a lot of books and articles on how and why it happens.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fascism is a characteristic of capitalist economies - it cannot exist without capitalism.

So no.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeas, in the sense that fascism is borne in capitalism, but it's also marks the end of capitalism and what comes after.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but it’s also marks the end of capitalism and what comes after.

No, it doesn't. Fascism poses no threat to capitalism and never has - that's the whole reason capitalists eagerly fund fascists into power. Some fascists might dislike capitalism - such as Franco, for instance - but that doesn't mean fascism can exist without it in any way, shape or form.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Oh you got me wrong, of course fascism is created to serve capitalists, but after the fascist power grab, they don't need to have the theatre of freedom™ and markets anymore.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't fail. It succeeds horribly.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

It also fails, though. It's unsustainable, Capitalists sew the seeds of their own downfall. They just hope they enjoy the ride and pass the buck off to someone else.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago

If there isn't a large Socialist coalition to combat fascism, then fascism will rise before collapsing even harder. If there is a large Socialist coalition, and that coalition successfully combats the fascist powers, then some form of Socialism will likely replace it, and humanity can continue progressing instead of regressing.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

After capitalism,

  1. All firms should be democratic worker coops. The legal system would recognize the inalienable right to workers' control.
  2. Land and natural resources should be collectively owned with revenue from private use of this collective property going out as a UBI. The atmosphere is included and any carbon fees are included.
  3. Pools of collectivized capital democratically controlled by workers in member worker coops. Each worker coop leases all its capital from the pool
[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago

That would be nice. It's probably going to be war though.

[–] Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I remember reading a Guardian article in which it discussed the requirements of any market to either evolve or die based on the circumstances it finds itself in.

It highlighted that because Communism could not adapt quickly enough to its circumstances that it failed - the centrally governing authority were not able to efficiently or effectively govern the market at the time. Leading to multiple issues.

I would like to see the evolution of Capitalism. That we do not view everything only through an economic lens- there needs to be environmental, societal and political factors which must also be taken into account.

That and personal accountability and responsibility for business practices. For example you can pollute that waterway but we will take all your profits and you go to jail for 30years

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think this is the ideal. Capitalism is reigned in and regulated, consumers are encouraged to buy more expensive products in exchange for better conditions for the associated workers and the planet, labor unions surge, and billionaires are taxed out of existence.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

Capitalism evolves into either Socialism or fascism, so we should push for Socialism.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Neo-feudalism, then the thinning of the herd once high levels of automation are achieved.

[–] bbkpr@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Population decreases are already happening in modernized, wealthy countries, no need to do anything there. The poorer ones will end up starving as the climate collapses, so that's basically taken care of too. Population collapse isn't always good, though, somebody has to buy the goods and services.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Reading the comments here reminds me of that Slavoj Žižek/ Fredric Jameson quote:

It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

Post scarcity anarchism. I suggest you read Walkaway by Cory Doctorow. It made me into a (re)believer.

Feel free to pirate the book. Mr. Doctorow doesn't mind. He walks the walk.

[–] squid_slime@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

techno feudalism

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It already has failed. This is what comes after.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 15 points 8 months ago

With the way things are going, a return to out and out fascism.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 15 points 8 months ago

We're just going to revisit all the classics. Company towns, fuedalism, etc. The wasted potential is just sickening.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Fail" or "Succeed" is based on your perspective.

Capitalism won't fail. It's a great success to the rich who get richer by manipulating it.

Capitalism is a success, just not for us or anyone we know.

The 1% don't give a shit about that. If they did it wouldn't be an issue in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nac82@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Corporate feudalism was a fun concept I played with in high school, but now that I'm older, I think I was just approaching the concepts of a lot of modern cyberpunk settings portrayed.

[–] Nopulseoflife@discuss.online 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Could be a Star Trek “utopia”. Technology lets us figure out how to solve resource allocation.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

As long as psychopaths get easy access to power our world will be nothing but a way to extract wealth from the workers to the owners.

Period.

Even if capitalism disappeared today, the billionaires would reinvent it.

Eat the rich, it is the only environmentally friendly solution

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 11 points 8 months ago

A mass die off

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago

Depends on the place. A cycle of failures is a feature of capitalism, it's the opportunity for the next future failure to rise up and take charge. For great profit.

Lots of power struggles until one faction comes out on top (this includes subjugation and the equivalent of puppet states) or, less likely, those involved reach an agreement of coexistence.

Sometimes I think that humanity not breaking up into smaller groups after they passed a size of ~200 was a serious mistake.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

We return to bigger army diplomacy.

Jk, we never left that system.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Anarchy, of the Mad Max variety because when capitalism finally fails, it's gonna be because they completely destroyed the fucking world.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 9 points 8 months ago

Neo-stoneage.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Society fragments into a bunch of smaller communities. Some will be relatively nice, some very much will not

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

Chaos and war, probably.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

Capitalism doesn't "fail" per se. Capitalism is actually the default. All other systems require some kind of active intervention and oversight.

Capitalism simply "wins" due to being the best at making the most money. Whether that actually benefits humanity is a crapshoot.

Countries can set up some kind of socialist system, but things will "default" back to capitalism when corruption and/or stupidity inevitably happen.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If pop culture is to be believed, the country boys will go back to hunting and farming. At least until the diesel runs out. They'll fight off the free loading hoards from the city looking for food until the ammunition runs out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 4 points 8 months ago

Lemmyreddit finds a new political/economic system to constantly be bitter at.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sadly , the country supports gun ownership strongly. It is probably going to be a black summer deal.

[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Automation powered socialism or famine. Depends where you live I guess. Some places will fare better than others. I think predictive factors will be level of corruption and magnitude of wealth gap as well as general education of populace.

[–] asbestos@toot.community 2 points 8 months ago

@return2ozma

@hosford42
The ascendancy of bowling 🎳

load more comments
view more: next ›