582
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Joe Biggs, a Proud Boys leader convicted of seditious conspiracy who the government says "served as an instigator and leader" during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison on Thursday.

It is among the longest sentences in Capitol riot cases. The record is the 18-year sentence given to Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, also convicted of seditious conspiracy, after prosecutors sought 25 years in federal prison in his case.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 46 points 10 months ago

“We have to be careful to count speech for what it is and not what it might do”

— Biggs’ lawyer, Norm Pattis

got it! gonna find the nearest crowded movie theatre and yell "FIRE!" at the top of my lungs. thanks, norm!

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

In general, a conspiracy charge can't be sustained on speech alone; even speech wherein two or more people agree to commit a crime. It additionally requires some overt material act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

If Alice, Bob, and Carla get together and make a plan to break Dan's window and steal his fancy new TV, that's just talk. But if Alice then goes to the hardware store and buys a window-smashing hammer, now all three can be convicted for conspiracy to commit burglary.

In this case, Biggs' overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy included actually breaking down fences to get at Congress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conspiracy

[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

indeed. this is why the speech itself must be considered as part of the conspiracy. the comment by his lawyer seems to take the entire act and reframe it around the speech, when its clear the speech and the act are, essentially, one in this case.

edit: errant full stop

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, the latest conservative tactic for pardoning criminality seems to be generalizing the acts into meaninglessness then pretending that generalized act is what's being prosecuted. This case very clearly fits the definition of a criminal conspiracy but they're trying to convince the base that the DoJ is ready to prosecute all conservatives for wrongthink.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

He’ll be 57 when he gets out so that’s a good 40+ years left for his political career.

[-] Hogger85b@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

He will get out on feb 2025 when president trump pardons all of them.

And I say that as someone that will.vote democrat, I just recognise reality

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Trump won’t pardon them. He hates his base more than we do. He only pardons people who are on a level that allows to them to help Trump personally.

Also, I’m pretty damned cynical, but I still think there is less than a 50% chance trump wins. Unfortunately 49% is very uncomfortable.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

They tried to help him, the problem is they failed. Trump doesn't like losers who can't even pull off a coup.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stevieb@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I believe he'd absolutely pardon them. Not because he cares about them, but because it would "legitimize" his claim that the election was stolen. Or just because it would be a distraction for people to talk about while he does whatever he wants.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

$2M was the going rate for a pardon, IIRC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

If New Hampshire decides he's ineligible for the primary because of his past bullshit, it'll absolutely start a domino effect of other states doing the same.

I'm not american, so I'm not sure, but doesn't that mean if he literally can't be the republican candidate if too many states say no?

I mean, yeah, he can run independent I suppose, but Trump's ego isn't just about being president. He gets off on having the GOP under his thumb. Once that goes away, even if he "wins" as an independent, would he even be able to accomplish anything?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ElleChaise@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just a friendly reminder to any shit-birds reading; this is the nicest version of what we will do to traitors. You will not overthrow the government, you will not reinstate a four time impeached Yankee carpet bagger as president, you will not pass go, nor will you collect $200. You will simply rot in prison, again: at best.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Not so proud to be America's neofascist enemy anymore I'm guessing.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

These guys got so caught up in brainwashing themselves. Honestly they think they are the next Nelson Mandela of the US. Then they find out effectively none were supporting them.

When they go to jail there won't be any protest. They will be alone. What a hill to die on.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Honestly they think they are the next Nelson Mandela of the US

There were like the Tory militias fighting for George III against George Washington. These assholes were literally trying to destroy the government set up by George Washington and the founding fathers.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

He claims that, "I’m not a terrorist, I don’t have hate in my heart." It's funny how all of them are just so magically reformed once they're facing actual prison time.

[-] Sorchist@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] brambledog@infosec.pub 15 points 10 months ago

Just a reminder: on the day tweets were claiming the gallow was brought into DC by one of the vehicles in Alex Jones' motorcade.

We need to be clear here: Mike Pence was going to be assassinated on January 6th.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

And Pence is still jerking them all off, his would be lynchers.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago

Hey, it's his thing. He likes his wife to control his behavior towards women and his would be assassins to piss on him.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

With good behavior, he can be free in only 14.5 years, and he was let off lightly.

Imagine throwing away almost 15 years of your life, destroying your family, and losing everything you worked for, because you believed Trump. Then finding out that it was all one big lie.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Really sounds like he fucked around and found out.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Later, loser.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 9 points 10 months ago

Tarrio is the one I'm waiting on... Good riddance to bad rubbish!

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

The greatest trick ever pulled was liberal New York city elite trump convincing southern yokels he's one of them. You can fool some of the people all of the time. They're called conservatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Does proud boys sound super gay to anyone else ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not long enough, but when is it ever?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The record is the 18-year sentence given to Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, also convicted of seditious conspiracy, after prosecutors sought 25 years in federal prison in his case.

The government sought 33 years for Biggs, an Army veteran who sustained a head injury in Iraq and then served as a correspondent for the conspiracy website Infowars.

Prosecutors argued that he was a “vocal leader and influential proponent of the group’s shift toward political violence” and used his “outsized public profile” and his military experience as he “led a revolt against the government in an effort to stop the peaceful transfer of power.”

He ruled earlier in Thursday's hearing that Biggs’ tearing down of a fence that stood between police and rioters qualified him for a terrorism sentencing enhancement sought by prosecutors.

The other Proud Boys will also be sentenced in the coming days: Rehl on Thursday afternoon, Pezzola and Nordean on Friday and Tarrio on Tuesday.

The actions of the Proud Boys on Jan. 6 were “quintessential pollical behavior” up until the riot turned violent, Pattis said, arguing that prosecutors had used his client’s political speech as evidence of criminal intent.


The original article contains 787 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Thanks Bot, but in this particular case I’m going to savour every word of the full article. No hard feelings.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

I think maybe they “found out.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Let's get all the Pink Boys and Oath Breakers into prison. And same for those that planned the coup and goaded them into this.

Also, I want to get Flynn and his brother and Wray under the microscope, too. What did they know, when did they know it and who were they talking to?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
582 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18076 readers
4958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS