774
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Last July, we noted how media reform activists had petitioned the FCC to revoke Fox News’ local broadcast license in Philadelphia. More specifically, the group argued that Fox News’ rampant election fraud propaganda technically violated the “character clause” embedded in the Communications Act the FCC is supposed to use to determine whether an organization should hold a broadcast license.

To be clear, a single Fox broadcast affiliate losing its license to broadcast in Philly wouldn’t have much of an impact on Fox’s ongoing efforts to spew GOP propaganda nationwide.

But, if successful, it might be replicable in other markets. Even if not, it serves a useful function in terms of activism and gaining media exposure for the need for some flavor of regulatory reform (like restoring popular, bipartisan media consolidation limits stripped away by the Trump FCC, media antitrust reform, or having the FCC actually use its authority to ensure economic and racial diversity ownership in media).

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 85 points 10 months ago

A gentle reminder that if you pay for a cable or satellite TV package, even if you don’t watch fox, you’re still giving money to Fox. They get a cut of every Cable TV and Satellite TV subscriber.

[-] this@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago
[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

Glad to see these thoughts spelled out:

We inhabit an era where the question “what do we do about Fox News propaganda?” sees a real shortage of solutions that are both practical and don’t run afoul of the First Amendment. Everything in the conversation tends to steer toward what’s not possible. Or they involve unworkable gibberish like trying to bring back the Fairness Doctrine (which wouldn’t apply to cable TV anyway).

So I think it’s good that activists are trying something creative and new. I think it’s good to have a broader conversation about what can actually be done about authoritarian and right wing propaganda. I think it’s good to form new, bipartisan coalitions that finally recognize the harm in partisan propaganda masquerading as news. Because our efforts up to this point have consisted of either stoic tut-tutting about what’s not possible under the First Amendment, or half-baked incoherence.

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 28 points 10 months ago

Republicans will claim this is further proof they’re being illegally silenced, their supporters will lap it up and rage hate online. And the divide will ever grow wider.

[-] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] Gerbler@lemmy.ml 27 points 10 months ago

Truth. You can't be afraid of upsetting the perpetually upset. Even if you do nothing they'll just invent something to be mad about.

[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I've been hearing a lot of Neville Chamberlains decrying every action to hold Republicans accountable or establish rules to curtail bad behavior as widening the divide, but I've yet to see any attempts to bridge that gap(by the Left) have any positive effect, much less get reciprocated.

They don't care about fairness, or law, or compromise. They only want more, and if you don't establish boundaries, they'll keep taking more.

[-] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

I agree, it has been shown that decoupling people from their source of propaganda can deradicalize (some of) them. So yes they'll be angry for a while, but it'll be good in the long run.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

They were going to do that anyways, fuck em.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Yes, but, that rage and anger will turn some to act. Without knowing who all could be hurt, this should at least send a lot more of them to jail. If they can't be bothered to know the laws beforehand or have their guy strip away that power, then it's off to jail! I just hope too many aren't hurt in the process. Truth and rightfulness alone can't protect us.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago
[-] radix@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

OANN doesn't have a FCC broadcast license. They're cable only.

WTXF is owned and operated by the Fox corporation, one of 18 such Fox-affiliated stations in the country (Fox owns others but they don't run any sort of news/"news" programming, so are probably safe). Even if all of them lose their broadcast license over this, it wouldn't really affect the main Fox News cable channel at all.

Full list here.

[-] DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Won’t ever happen. Great job getting the clicks “abovethelaw.com”

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Maybe it won't happen, but this is the kind of clever stuff you see The Satanic Temple doing, and for that reason, it's probably worth the effort.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What about the boomers /s

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
774 points (97.8% liked)

News

21742 readers
3362 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS