this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
416 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 152 points 7 months ago (3 children)

"Don Poorleone" is a masterful jab at Trump's ego, I love to see it.

Also, anyone who represents Trump in court should already have known, that at some point or other he will blurt out something that undermines his own case.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 81 points 7 months ago

“I made an offer everyone refused.”

I'm crying over here.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 32 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Could add a middle name moniker in quotes just to twist the knife, like some of the old mobsters used to have. Like Frankie "the nose" Luciano.

So Don "little hands" Poorleone

[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

"rapey" Don Poorleone

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don "Cheeto dust" Poorleone

Don "Bone Spurs" Poorleone

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago

Pussy hands!

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 60 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Calling Destitute Don names is unsportsmanlike.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Tell that shit stain that I'm not much of an athlete

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don’t have dime store Donald’s number but I can understand why you would think turtlehead Trump would have dirty Donny diapers.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago
[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

I would happily swap all my assets and capital with trump. And I wouldn't call myself poor afterwards

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Memes won't change what will happen. He will get a stay from an appeals court, they will reduce the bond to a fraction of what it was and he will pay it and suffer almost no consequences

Edit: oh hey, I can predict the future would you look at that

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 33 points 7 months ago

They've already denied it. Trump's claims of having the money but not wanting to spend it on this isn't helping him either.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

If the BBC article is right, he might get some loans considering he might get a rather good leverage with Truth Social stock... https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68609007

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

At what time of day is the actual deadline?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The "deadline" is tomorrow whenever. If he doesn't post a bond tomorrow, the state can begin proceedings to seize assets. Likely the first step will be to get a court order probibiting Trump from selling off or giving away any assets, which he will fight tooth and nail. The process could take months or years, and if he is elected president he can make that money ten times over selling more state secrets.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How many classified documents does Trump have to sell to Russia to make back the 500m?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

If he was a smooth criminal, one. But in reality Putin will take advantage of his stupidity and ask for them all.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The President can declassify anything, apparently, so he wouldn't need to sell any classified documents, just ask for bids on which to declassify.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Some say he can declassify just by thinking about it!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He'll end up paying it. It's been a slow news week.

[–] lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The real question is - how is Putin going to funnel the money to him?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

The same way he sold secrets to the Saudis through a $2 billion "investment" in an unskilled, unqualified relative.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago

Bed Bath & Beyond gift card and coupons.

[–] SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Two Pence None The Richer

[–] elvith@feddit.de 12 points 7 months ago

I mean he's named Donald so we all know how this is going to end...

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sure he hasn't that much money, he's Donald not Scrooge McDuck.