266
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swiftcasty@kbin.social 46 points 2 months ago

The leotard in question is worn by the model on the far right who, even though she is cut off, visibly has her hands covering her groin area. Perhaps a re-design is in order?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

If you’re too embarrassed to stand still on stage with it, competing isn’t gonna go well

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Nike defended itself by noting that Team USA athletes not only have a choice between briefs and shorts but a wide variety of other outfit combinations. And the reigning Olympic pole vault champion, Katie Moon, criticized the notion that the uniforms are sexist. “Whether we feel best in a potato sack or a bathing suit during competitions, we should support the autonomy,” Moon, who is sponsored by Nike, wrote on Instagram.

Sounds to me like they can chose whatever cut they prefer. The outrage should be more directed at the advertisement choice than the actual product line.

[-] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

Which is a very shitty take. If they advertised with a string tanga and those star-shaped things some stripers tape to their nipples, everyone would be upset as well (and rightfully so). It's not a matter of choice, the proposition itself is an insult.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Thong and tassles next time

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Go full ancient Greece and compete nude /s

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

NPR's article shows more people and a male athlete is also in skimpy bottoms and rocking the fig leaf hands.

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/15/1244773342/nike-team-usa-women-uniform-revealing-olympics

[-] sverit@feddit.de 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Looks more like shorts to me. You can see the Nike logo on the left thigh.

[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

In another photo, you can see that it's just shorts https://wwd.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DOM0116.jpg?w=1280

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

I can't be the only one to notice that Nike thinks that able women should be sexualized, but disabled ones should wear long pants. I'm not sure which women that is more insulting to.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

Both. Each side of that equation makes the other one worse

[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago

There's no sexism on sport. Wtf are you talking about?!

/s just in case.

[-] ObsidianNebula@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago

What's going on with Nike and their uniforms? The MLB ones are pretty bad where you can basically see through the pants, and now this.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Gotta grift somewhere. Make that fabric shear so we use less and just call it "breathable" and "form fitted." And then charge em 3 times more.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

I doubt anyone at Nike is giving two shits about the fabric savings for the Olympic team uniforms lol

[-] TGTX@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Uniforms on the MLB side seem to be getting worse after the start of the season. There have been instances already of pants just ripping apart. Now, there have been sweat stain issues with the uniforms too. Some teams like the Mariners, Rangers, and Brewers are still waiting on full uniform sets. It’s been a chaotic mess.

[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Uniforms should be issued, not designed by the country. Some countries have invested $10,000s of dollars to ensure their athletes have the least amount of drag, namely in swimming. At that point, it isn't the talent of the athlete, it's the clothes. Put everyone on even playing ground clothes wise.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

This would be my preference. The Olympic committee should put out a set of design and material guidelines, and each athlete can choose from that. That can have them printed with different patterns or whatever, but it must meet the guidelines. There should probably be several different shapes for "men" and "women" patterns that anyone can choose from any set.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The original Olympics were a bunch of greased up naked guys

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

They tied their foreskins shut so it was appropriate. (I'm not shitposting, Google it)

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

I hope they organize a "no shave" protest.

[-] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I thought the same thing. The article mentions Brazilian waxes, and my immediate thought was f-that. Go full bush. You wanna see what my junk is really like? Feel free to view it in its natural state.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Girls are much more likely than boys to drop out of competitive sports. It’s little wonder when revealing kits are highlighted on the global stage

It’s likely more to do with pay and societal pressures

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Societal pressures like being sexy over being talented?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago

No, pressures to be a mom, take a quiet job, and be submissive

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
266 points (92.9% liked)

News

21687 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS