cfgaussian

A surprisingly good video despite the somewhat clickbait-y title. The most important takeaway: Global south countries are no longer buying the West's propaganda, even about long demonized countries like the DPRK. "Your enemies are not our enemies." A polite way of saying: GTFO, we decide who we do business with, not you.

The red flag fell over the Kremlin in 1991.

The West declared victory. China took notes.

For three decades, the CPC has dissected why the USSR collapsed—not because socialism failed, but because its guardians surrendered.

Here’s what China learned.

1 — Bread, Then Ballots: How Economic Mismanagement Triggered Collapse

China's first lesson: economic reform must consolidate socialism—not dismantle it.

Gorbachev reversed this logic, liberalizing politics before resolving stagnation.

“Gorbachev was pushing political reform ahead of economic reform; China under Deng was promoting economic reform ahead of political reform.” — Victor Gao

Perestroika unleashed market chaos without structure. Supply chains collapsed. Prices exploded.

"The privatization reform led to a serious polarization of the distribution of wealth, a lack of socialist ideals and beliefs, an extremely chaotic sense of ethics and morality, and an all-round regression of the social spirit." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

The acute failure wasn’t socialism itself, but reform without sequence, without control.

2 — Historical Nihilism: How the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Lost the Will to Rule

The CPC’s second lesson: revolutions die when they lose faith in themselves.

“There are multiple factors contributing to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a very important one being Khrushchev throwing away Stalin’s knife and Gorbachev’s open betrayal of Marxism-Leninism.” - CPC leader Hu Jintao

“Khrushchev’s denunciation ‘shook the foundations’ of Soviet authority.” — Hu Jintao

Gorbachev’s glasnost reforms—intended as renewal—accelerated ideological collapse.

"After the legalization of private newspapers and the privatization of state-run media, the main media in the Soviet Union were soon controlled by private capital and elite forces inside and outside the Soviet Union.

Capital at home and abroad tried its best to vilify and subvert the socialist system and preach the glorification of the eternal rule of capitalism...

With the implementation of the policy of "openness without restrictions," a vigorous trend of historical nihilism that negated the CPSU and the Soviet Union rapidly spread to the historiographical, theoretical, and ideological circles." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

“An important reason [for the Soviet collapse] was that their ideals and convictions wavered.” — Xi Jinping

A party that discredits its own history cannot hold power.

Historical nihilism was suicide by self-critique.

3 — From One Party to No Party: How the CPSU Dismantled Itself

The CPSU didn’t fall to a revolution. It collapsed because no one defended it—not the Party, not the people, not the army.

Gorbachev’s reforms eroded Party control: contested elections, a presidency outside the Party, pluralist elites.

"The so-called Gorbachev-style socialism was just a slogan, he himself did not have a well-formed concept.

At that time Gorbachev also came up with this slogan, ‘More socialism, more democracy’. This is a very stupid way of putting it. Is there socialism or is there not socialism?

The reference to more or less is nonsense.

So when the question was raised as to what is 'more socialism', Gorbachev, the proponent of this formulation, himself spread his arms and didn't know how to answer." — Aleksandr Kapto, Former Head of CPSU Central Committee’s Ideological Department

When the Party’s authority dissolved, the state followed.

Reform without discipline became liquidation.

4 — One Union, Fifteen Flags: How the USSR Imploded from the Periphery

The Soviet Union constitutionally allowed its republics to secede. And when the center weakened, they did.

“Even a symbolic secession clause can become a real dagger when central authority wanes.” — Global Times

Gorbachev’s decentralization enabled nationalist movements to legally dissolve the Union.

“Moscow’s failure to ‘subordinate ethnic identity and stamp out local nationalisms’ was a primary reason the federation dissolved.” — Prof. Ma Rong, Peking University

Beijing responded by rejecting Soviet-style federalism.

China recognizes ethnic diversity—but sovereignty is indivisible. National cohesion is a red line.

5 — Overreach, Not Encirclement: How the USSR Exhausted Itself Geopolitically

The USSR wasn’t simply outgunned—it overextended itself trying to match imperial pressure on imperial terms.

Arms races, Afghanistan, client-state subsidies—it drained itself.

Military spending rose to an estimated 15–17% of Soviet GDP by the 1980s, a colossal allocation that starved civilian sectors.

The CPC sees this as partially self-inflicted. The West pushed, but the USSR walked into the trap.

The Chinese lesson: strength begins with development, not illusions of trust or military footprint.

6 — Dollar Wars: How U.S. Finance Helped Break the Soviet Economy

The CPC also studied how the USSR was broken by oil shocks and credit warfare.

In the 1980s, oil revenues were the USSR’s lifeline. When Saudi overproduction—backed by the U.S.—crashed prices, Soviet income collapsed.

“The Soviet economy was ‘fragile’ by the 1980s, overly dependent on resource exports and burdened by costly obligations.” — CCTV / Global Times

Desperate, Soviet leaders turned to Western credit—but loans came with strings: liberalization, privatization, and chaos.

Core lesson: never let your economy be hostage to foreign currencies, foreign markets, or foreign lenders.

7 — Peaceful Evolution: How the West Won the Information War

The USSR didn’t just lose a battle of arms. It lost a battle of ideas.

Western liberalism entered via glasnost, NGOs, dissidents, and cultural infiltration. The CPSU disarmed itself ideologically—and the West filled the vacuum.

“The CPSU’s removal of the seal of Marxism and Leninism in the ideological field... set free the demon, which destroyed it. The collapse of thoughts brought the collapse of the CPSU.” — CPC Documentary

Western NGOs, spies, and propaganda efforts incubated a pro-Western fifth column within the USSR.

Ideological security is national security. If your enemies teach your youth what to believe, you’ve already lost.

7 — No One Resisted: The Final Lesson of Soviet Collapse

When the end came, no one defended the Soviet Union. 19 million Party members stood down. The military didn’t act. The state evaporated without resistance.

The Party had died long before the flag came down.

“In the end, nobody was a real man, nobody came out to resist.” — Xi Jinping

The CPC sees this as the endgame of ideological surrender, strategic confusion, and liberal reform: not death by external blow—but collapse from within.

"Individuals from Khrushchev to Gorbachev slowly distorted, castrated, falsified, and betrayed the correct theoretical foundation laid by Lenin for the CPSU...

If the foundation is not strong, the earth moves and the mountain shakes. Having lost the theoretical basis of Marxism-Leninism, the Soviet Union’s collapse was inevitable." — CPC documentary

From Beijing's 2006 documentary 'Preparing For Danger In Times Of Safety – Historic Lessons Learned from the Demise of Soviet Communism':

"From the 1991 Soviet disintegration to the end of the 20th century, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 52% compared with the GDP level in 1990, while it declined only 22% during the war years from 1941 to 1945.

Over the same period (1991 to the end of the 20th century), Russian industrial production decreased by 64.5%, and agricultural production by 60.4%.

As the ruble devaluated, prices rose 5000 times.

Since 1992, the Russian population has been declining. In 1990 average life expectancy in Russia was 69.2 years, but it fell to 65.3 years in 2001, almost 4 year’s decline. The male life expectancy in some parts dropped a full 10 years.

The disintegration of the CPSU and the Soviet Union has brought disastrous consequences to the people and the country, far beyond these figures and situations."

This is the Yaxi Expressway in southwest China's Sichuan province. It features some of the highest and longest bridges in the world.

Here's a little article about it: https://themindcircle.com/yaxi-expressway-traversing-the-clouds/

Side note: am i the only one who finds this crazy scary to look at? I'm sure it's awesome driving on it, but looking at it from afar it looks wild.

I'm not the biggest fan of BE, i think his online persona can be grating at times, and his takes on China are very half-baked and borderline ignorant, but on this issue he is 100% right. Everyone needs to hear this. If you invite liberal Zionists and Zionist apologist socdem politicians on your stream and don't call them out as the supporters and enablers of genocide that they are, you don't get to call yourself "pro-Palestinian".

Action, meet Consequences

People probably don't realize the stakes at play here and how thankful they should be for China's unyielding position since "liberation day". The future of the global order literally rests on it.

Basically they keep repeating almost word-for-word the same thing for 3 weeks:

"Tariff and trade wars have no winners... China doesn't look for a war but neither are we afraid of it... If the U.S. wants to talk, it should stop threatening and blackmailing [us] and seek dialogue based on equality, respect and mutual benefit. To keep asking for a deal while exerting extreme pressure is not the right way to deal with China and simply will not work."

Translation: remove the tariffs, approach us as equals, or there will be no deal. Period.

There's a good case to be made that it is this very consistency in China's stance that's: a) emboldening other nations to resist American pressure—not a single country has capitulated to US demands since China took its stand b) forcing the Trump administration to negotiate against itself, exposing the fundamental weakness of bullying as diplomatic strategy

This moment echoes pivotal historical turning points where great power behavior set precedents for decades—like Suez in 1956 or the Cuban Missile Crisis—only with potentially more far-reaching consequences.

Like those watershed events, China's resistance now sets a precedent that will probably shape international relations for years to come.

If China were to yield, make no mistake about what would follow:

The geopolitical landscape would transform overnight—smaller nations and probably even regional blocs like the EU would read the writing on the wall and fall in line, knowing resistance would be futile against a vindicated America if even China had to yield.

We'd witness American hubris on steroids, with Trump and future administrations validated in their belief that unilateral bullying is effective foreign policy: it would become their blueprint in an even worse way than it already is.

Most disturbing would be the effective end of multipolarity—for what is a 'pole' if it can simply be intimidated into compliance? In fact, it would undermine the very concept of sovereignty itself.

While China certainly pursues its own interests, its steadfast position makes it objectively the main bulwark against a pure "might makes right" world.

And as such what's at play here goes far [beyond] whether China or America "wins" this particular standoff, but whether concepts like sovereignty and multilateralism, can survive.

Paradoxically we're in a place where if there's such thing as a "rules-based international order", China is the last meaningful defender of its core tenets, and the primary check against a dystopian slide toward predatory unilateralism, where sovereignty would become merely ceremonial—a polite fiction maintained at the pleasure of Washington.

Future historians may mark this moment as when the international system either reaffirmed its commitment to sovereign equality or surrendered to the law of the jungle—with China, somewhat unexpectedly, standing as civilization's last line of defense.

"Britain’s obsession with wresting Sevastopol from Moscow’s grasp dates back to the Crimean War of 1853-1856, but the leaked documents clearly show the city’s seizure is still considered a vital, and achievable, objective from London’s perspective."

[...]

"Project Alchemy declared that the effort “could be the tip of the spear to a larger offensive with an aim of retaking Crimea… something deemed impossible by many including [the] Kremlin, that may be their undoing.”

Previous reports by The Grayzone on Project Alchemy’s clandestine activities have revealed how much of the cell’s plotting was informed by deluded conceptions of perceived historic British military glories, such as the World War II-era Special Operations Executive, a forebearer of CIA/MI6-run Operation Gladio."

The British need professional psychological help. There is something seriously wrong with this country.

"When a comrade flies, it is as if i fly."

China's Shenzhou-20 crewed mission successfully launched on April 24, also marking the nation's 10th Space Day. The China Manned Space Agency said that its crewed moon landing mission is progressing steadily. What skills will astronauts need for the lunar mission? How can younger generations reach for the stars? Zhao Chuandong, a first-generation Chinese astronaut, shares his insights.