Do we have a formal list of these somewhere?
dat_math
It's probably safer (not that the bar is at a reasonable height to begin with) and I'm virtually certain it can carry standard drywall panels
"and he's going to do anything I tell him to do" might be powerful enough to resurrect UlyssesT
That's an orthogonal injustice though, no? Collectively, our species massively overproduce food, so I would think the fact that there is a prior reason to be trying to cultivate land like this, which ought to be managed for native flora/fauna is a separate and solvable large scale land allocation problem, the solution to which frees whatever livestock use the argument excuses.
not containing enough meat for a person to survive
That's weird. The amount of meat required for a person to survive is exactly 0 grams.
Amerikkka clocking in at just over 126kg/capita
enjoy that constipation burgerbrains
There's an element of truth here, in that parts of the world have a system where farm animals eat stuff humans can't, such as wild grass, kitchen waste and straw
The carbon, nitrogen, etc. contained in that grass, waste, and straw should be buried in/returned to the soil to grow plants instead of being farted into our atmosphere. Assuming the land in question is arable in the first place (which I think is valid if it's producing enough plant matter for grazing to be viable), if managed at all would produce more calories of human-compatible nutrition per calorie invested than harvesting of grazing animals on said land would.
Yeah you would think carnists (especially farmers) would understand feed conversion ratios, but alas
pesticides and fertilizer!
Those beans are too far down the gullet to fart pipeline