kivork

I think people on hexbear would not want to "defend the constitution" or be an "asset" to the most evil empire in history. It sucks to lose a job and a likely relatively stable one, but I think it comes off as sarcastic because this is a leftist site- I would guess lussy has no alegience to the constitution or the country.

I hate this world

I don't think it has anything to do with the quality of your recommendations. People have limited time. With Avatar - you are asking that someone commit to 3 seasons of a children's show that they probably already understand the gist of through its place in culture.

From their perspective - I think in the moment it sounds exciting to get a recommendation and feel like you'll definitely make time for it but then you get home and it's the next day and you'd rather spend your limited time on your own stuff.

I'm sorry that they aren't reciprocating but unfortunately there really isn't a solution here. This will be the case with the vast majority of recommendations your whole life. I wouldn't read too much into it.

Partner and I recently had our first kid, and it's the best thing we've ever done. Also the most stressful.

We did wait though until our mid thirties, and that seems to be more normal now. I can't imagine having a kid when my parents did, I don't know how people can afford that now.

Just to expand on the cheaper option- there really is no such thing in the US. I went to my local poor univerity that I rode my bike to each day while still living with my parents - total cost for 4 years was around 20k. I think the average is like 40k without paying for housing

Everybody in the US is stuck with student debt. No poor person is even considering high tier universities- those are exclusively for rich people and people who get full ride scholarships.

Community college is cheaper but then you can't get a bachelor's degree from a community college.

I don't really think it's offering anything new. I enjoyed it and would recommend it but it's mostly just a fun dark comedy.

The point is that men view and treat women as robots to use as they please. The movie is about a "robot" (woman) escaping the man controlling her and finding her agency

Getting girls being the primary focus of men is a product of patriarchy. That you are less of a man if you aren't having sex.

It's so hard to do because what you're asking for is a reactionary podcast (one premised on and reinforcing patriarchy) that moves people left. That's a huge contradiction to start. Maybe you could smuggle in healthier views about sex and gender but people aren't stupid, they smell through that, and they'll just go to other media.

Left wing media and communities like this one should be breaking down this kind of thinking and helping men to find other avenues to define themselves through.

I think the response to this is what about the left wing incels? Do left wing men just not have sex? And my bad answer is - kindof ya. Left wing men should be pursuing relationships with all kinds of people. Friendships with women and people of all genders and no gender. If you have close relationships with people, sex will come. Maybe that means you have sex years layer than some of your peers- and ya that's what it means to stop using your patriarchal advantages to get sex.

If your goal is to sex women at a bar, then of course right wing media is the place to go.

I may be missing a joke, but Bob Ross does this by using a lot of shortcuts and brush stroke techniques. I think he's respected but I don't think most artists feel at all outclassed. I paint too and while I love the idea of him showing that anyone can paint, I wouldn't really want my landscapes to look like his do.

No hate towards him at all but it's just a different way of painting that kindof maximizes time to output efficiency. But I enjoy painting, and I'm good with a painting taking 20 hours.

Resume advice is nonsense. I've been told by recruiters that I shouldn't have removed irrelevant positions because every bit counts. And I've been told by recruiters it's a good idea to remove irrelevant positions because it's just clutter.

I've always kept my resume 1 page long and remove jobs or line items that dont add much. I've had recruiters and managers praise my resume for being so compact and others complain that there are gaps or that it's kindof selling myself short.

It's all just the whims of whichever middle manager ultimately looks at it. The real advice is to make a resume that gets past the algorithms by rephrasing slightly to include keywords from the job description, and then just cross your fingers that your format happens to align with their preference.

Seriously, it turns out all it took to get regular people to support hitler was to just get a 2nd hitler.

It short circuits them

IQ isn't real. You claim to be forced by the system to hate Indians. I think you're not the leftist you think you are