this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
1585 points (95.6% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

759 readers
1014 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The problem with a two party system is that it polarizes the grey areas where a lot of people don't have friendship or family ending feelings. When people subscribe whole heartedly to party mindsets they gain friends in that group but wall themselves off from others.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When people subscribe whole heartedly to party mindsets they gain friends in that group but wall themselves off from others.

This is when people make their political views part of their identity. If the party does something that you don't agree with you are faced with two choices (sub-consciously); either you change your views to match the party, or you invalidate part of your identity. Depending on how big a part of your identity you have subsumed to the party; the harder it is to break that part of your identity.

It is always a worrying sign when someone says "I am a "; rather than saying "I support ". Support can easily be modified and revoked, your identity is not so easy to change.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sad to see that basic human rights are party mindsets still.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Disingenuous. You want to talk human rights? How about Democratic support for Israel?

But I would only bring that into conversation when someone's being disingenuous, because.. Oh, yes. It's disingenuous.

The worst part is, the Republican party is having a massive leadership crisis, and rather than dating things like "your leaders are fucking you over", dems seem to think it's a great idea to "shame" the Republicans - i.e., insult them for their identity - and alienaten them.

I am really starting to feel that Democrats don't care how anyone votes, as long as they can get their moral superiority rocks off without having to actually dip their toes into nuanced (and actually moral) reasoning. Like, there's so much fear, that you can't help but create the situations you fear worst.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yea I speak out against the leadership supporting Israel, what's your point. I see tons of Republicans supporting the genocide wholeheartedly and loving how much their leadership spews hate toward me and my people and my friends for just existing.

It isn't a leadership crisis, they know exactly who they have and WANT exactly who they have. I don't know how else I can try and help them understand in good faith when they constantly spit at us. Look at project 2025 as the most recent example, they deserve to be shamed if they still call themselves what they do after seeing that. There's only so much I can do and so much I can take from them. I'm probably gonna trigger you for saying this but we didn't talk Hitler down in good faith. We didn't break slavery with talks and communication, we didn't bring the lgbt community that I belong to into the mainstream and out of the closet by asking nicely and convincing people with words alone. Ghandi didn't liberate India because of his nonviolence, it was thanks to like minded but violent groups showing force that ghandis message was listened too. The black panthers had to go out and show force for mlks talks to matter.

The 'fear' I have isn't self created, it's one I've experienced for just existing from very specific people who support a very specific ideology.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah.. It really doesn't matter where it came from. The fear and the hate get in the way, and cause recursion.

That's not to say violence isn't necessary sometimes. It is. But there mentality with which you approach it has massive effect.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is true. But I think in today’s political climate, it is fair to conflate people’s political affiliation with the extremes of the party. Like “fiscally responsible republicans”, you can’t run away from the other bigoted policies of republicans. Same with democrats and things like immigration and supplying arms to Israel.

It’s a hard landscape to navigate, now probably more than ever.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

True, but that goes both ways, what with the casual support of genocide.

If anything, people should be looking at their parties, and either vacating or getting involved to make change, depending on how salvageable they think it is.