this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26890 readers
2625 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not asking for tech support here, just wondering if in theory it would be possible to create a plug-in or even a complete browser that blocks ads in a way that's impossible to detect. One model that comes to mind is a quarantined / containerized non-blocking virtual browser which queries the web server directly, then the UX filters the content from that container and presents it to the user ad-free. As far as the web server can tell, the containerized browser is just vanilla Chromium.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It doesn't matter how good your browser is when you can only access content through an app.

That's the way things are headed, I'm afraid. In a few years you won't be able to load Facebook, Youtube, Reddit, or Twitter(formally X) from a browser.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bleak but probably true. Cabin in the woods with a good book is my future.

What do you mean all the woods are "gone"?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Paper books won't be available either. You'll be watching ads in your cabin where the woods used to be.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They do still have to cater to desktop users, so I imagine accessible websites for those platforms will exist for many years to come.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

This is also yet another reason why it's important to defend desktops in the face of people who think phones and tablets are "good enough."

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Just download our app on the Microsoft Store/App Store!" /s

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

An ad-blocking DNS server on your local network should work for apps too, right? (As long as the ads are hosted on known ad servers.)

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 2 months ago

Should, yes, but the page/site may have ways to detect if the ad loads or not and still trigger "adblock in use".

A DNS-based approach also won't work if the ads come from the same domain as the content.