this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
578 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24190 readers
3188 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s army parade was neither the totalitarian North Korean spectacle that critics had grimly predicted, nor the triumph of MAGA nationalism fans craved

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The American military doesn't train to put on parade theatre for a despot. No high stepping, no elaborate formations or movements. None of that pointless bullshi

Marines doing the silent drill in dress uniform : 👀

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's like 20 dudes though who's entire job is drill and ceremonies, though.

The guys marching in this parade looked like they were forced on a group walk, and none of them looked like they wanted to be there.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Marching in step is basic training stuff. They know how to do it if they want to. The fact that they didn't is very important.

It’s harder than it looks, especially for miles and miles.

They might know how to do it, but people make mistakes.

Even if they were trying (and I don’t think they did give it 100%) you’d still be finding people who were out of step.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

Totally agreed. It's very much a statement being sent. It wasn't even half assed. You could get a group of normal people together and in an hour get them to at least be in lock step. These guys were just walking together loosely in formation.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What Trump wanted far exceeds marching in step. But even just that requires regular practice, which the US military simply does not bother with. Exceptions being a few ceremonial guards.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but the important point is that they know how to do better than they did. They're refusing on purpose.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know that's what I'd have done.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, I agree with all of you guys. I think they half-assed it on purpose. I have some friends that are in some premier units in the military, and all of them have pretty much come out and said their commanders have told them they will not deploy in this country.

Like 'here's how you sabotage your gear then go home with your loved ones' kind of talks.

The military is not on his side.

He said what he fucking said