this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
578 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24190 readers
3076 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s army parade was neither the totalitarian North Korean spectacle that critics had grimly predicted, nor the triumph of MAGA nationalism fans craved

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The American military doesn't train to put on parade theatre for a despot. No high stepping, no elaborate formations or movements. None of that pointless bullshit. If you see a military parade from NK or China achieving dazzling perfect performances, while impressive, that's all it is; a visual performance. All they do is practice for those events. Those are not uniforms. They're costumes. Those are not soldiers. They're a dance troupe. These are completely different skillsets. Soldiers don't need to know how to dance perfectly in formation. They storm the objective, execute the mission, and get the fuck out. You might as well send a marching band into combat, because that's all they would become.

It's funny how they want to force the US military into performing flamboyant pageantry, while also kicking out the gays.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats all nice what you said but its far more likely the members of the army just didnt care as much rather than they are incapable of marching in unison.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I know this from experience. Perfect formation marching must be drilled constantly. The US military does not waste its time with it because it is useless beyond Basic Training.

I agree that they clearly didn't want to be at his stupid little parade. Yes, they half-assed it. It just blows my mind that Trump clearly expected pageantry when our military has never once put on such a show.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I know this from experience. Perfect formation marching must be drilled constantly. The US military does not waste its time with it because it is useless beyond Basic Training.

As do I. There is no active duty enlisted person not capable of marching down a street in step in a reasonably square block. (And I would assume this also true for officers but I wouldn't know that.)

We're not talking about doing a halftime show in a marching band. It takes an hour of instruction and practice to do it reasonably well.

Sorry if it seems like I'm jumping on you, but I'm stunned at the number of folks scratching their heads like they aren't sure if the soldiers were intentionally out of step or not, and you are just the first one I've replied to. They were intentionally out of step.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying they weren't intentionally out of step (I definitely would have been) but based on my experience also in the military, as well as high school marching band, many people suck at it even after weeks of practice and my band director cared way about it than any NCO ever did, either in boot camp or beyond. They taught us how to align left and right, and how to march around a corner in formation. We did that until the end of boot camp and then never again. We got our asses handed to us for all kinds of minor infractions, but never once did I see anybody get even scolded for being out of step.

Frankly, it used to drive me crazy.

No worries dude, it doesn't feel like you're jumping on me. Maybe they were just way more lax about it in the Navy. When it came to marching, in my experience they barely gave a fuck.

One thing that seems pretty telling to me, and isn't really being mentioned, is that I didn't see any of them in dress uniforms. Weren't they all in camo?

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe they were just way more lax about it in the Navy. When it came to marching, in my experience they barely gave a fuck.

I was also USN, but it occurred to me after reading your post that maybe (I'm effing old) they do care about it less now than when I was in. To be clear - I too never marched after boot camp and A school, but if I'd been ordered to go be in a parade I'm sure we could have pulled it off.

No worries dude, it doesn’t feel like you’re jumping on me.

Thanks! 🙂 And do you still cringe when you hear someone say "Hey Shipmate?" It's been decades and I do!

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

My boot camp division actually did march in formation during Milwaukee's 4th of July parade. So we weren't too bad at it really.

I still treasure the sound of disappointed children when I expertly avoided stepping in a pile of horse shit.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Lol, yes I do!

[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The American military doesn't train to put on parade theatre for a despot. No high stepping, no elaborate formations or movements. None of that pointless bullshi

Marines doing the silent drill in dress uniform : 👀

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's like 20 dudes though who's entire job is drill and ceremonies, though.

The guys marching in this parade looked like they were forced on a group walk, and none of them looked like they wanted to be there.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Marching in step is basic training stuff. They know how to do it if they want to. The fact that they didn't is very important.

It’s harder than it looks, especially for miles and miles.

They might know how to do it, but people make mistakes.

Even if they were trying (and I don’t think they did give it 100%) you’d still be finding people who were out of step.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

Totally agreed. It's very much a statement being sent. It wasn't even half assed. You could get a group of normal people together and in an hour get them to at least be in lock step. These guys were just walking together loosely in formation.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What Trump wanted far exceeds marching in step. But even just that requires regular practice, which the US military simply does not bother with. Exceptions being a few ceremonial guards.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but the important point is that they know how to do better than they did. They're refusing on purpose.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know that's what I'd have done.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, I agree with all of you guys. I think they half-assed it on purpose. I have some friends that are in some premier units in the military, and all of them have pretty much come out and said their commanders have told them they will not deploy in this country.

Like 'here's how you sabotage your gear then go home with your loved ones' kind of talks.

The military is not on his side.

He said what he fucking said

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frederick the Great's legacy shines irony on many a homopgobic leader

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To explain and expand a bit on this: Frederick the Great was likely gay or at least somewhat queer, but also a military innovator who laid the basis for Prussia's iron discipline. Back then units were most effective when in perfect formation, but moving around the battlefield disrupted formation, hence the invention of the goose step to rapidly move units around on the battlefield without losing formation. Invented by a gay king.

So today we've got homophobic dictators emulating that for pure theatre and looks, over a century after it has lost any military purpose.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Additionally I've heard suspicion that some of the traditional pomp and theatrics that flow back to him are because he found it attractive.

If you've ever looked at all that dress military stuff snd thought that it just seemed a bit gayer than one would expect a military to get, just remember Frederick was that good. Like, made his small German kingdom into the European power of Prussia good.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

All I can think of, is Monty Python's Close Order Nastiness. "We know where you've been, you military fairy! OOOOOH"