this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13959 readers
642 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not gonna post the episode, tho, because fuck this sketch fails the Code of Conduct.

There's the intro screen for "Weinstein Company". Like damn I love these guys, but a bunch of the skits they do is fucked up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

More like “it was a period where things were so normalized that the amount of people saying this is wrong was drowned out and hard to come by”

It’s slightly disingenuous to act like a child of the 80s and 90s would stumble upon voices of the oppressed, which were actively stifled, and culturally we were taught to ignore.

I do not believe this excuses it of course but just as I think there is understanding to be had for the damaged victim of abusive guardians who then starts to perpetuate that cycle I think there is understanding to be had here as well. Similarly as said it does not excuse it and just as in that example while I have understanding I also still hold that victim accountable for their actions, though this consequence may be modulated given the circumstances. There is nuance, is my point