370
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Authorities find more bodies after initial report of 115 two weeks ago, when owners were evicted and police investigated foul odor

The remains of at least 189 decaying bodies were found and removed from a Colorado funeral home, up from about 115 reported when the bodies were discovered two weeks ago, officials said Tuesday.

The remains were found by authorities responding to a report of a foul odor at the Return to Nature funeral home inside a decrepit building in the small town of Penrose, Colorado.

Efforts to identify the remains began last week with help from an FBI team that gets deployed to mass casualty events like airline crashes. Fremont sheriff Allen Cooper described the scene as “horrific”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago

Funeral homes are parasites. Families should prepare and bury their own, unembalmed with no casket. A dead body is the most biodegradable matter in nature. Why pump it full of formalin and doll it up like a tart? Mourn the life of the dead, not their physical body.

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 107 points 8 months ago

Preparing and burying your own is a recipe for cholera outbreak

[-] deus@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Easy fix: don't bury people, just leave the bodies out in the open so scavengers can do their job.

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago
[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I unironically would love a sky burial. Vultures can digest anything. Chop me up, drive me out to the mountains and let the vultures shit me out. Seems better than the alternatives.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago
[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

We already have microplastics coming down with the rain, what's a few prions on top of that.

[-] 8BitRoadTrip@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

braaaaaiiiinnnzzzzzzz 🧟‍♂️

[-] mbp@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah prions do that

[-] snail@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

scavengers would die of toxicity from NSAIDs, chemo drugs, and whatever else modern humans load up on before their death. This already happened in places known for sky burials

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Cholera more requires the living and untreated water. Palestine is a recipe for a cholera outbreak. You'd need some spread among the living before the corpses become a real vector.

E coli maybe, but once again, only with untreated water.

For the most part, corpses don't really spread a lot of disease other than whatever killed them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago

It's illegal almost everywhere in the US to have a "natural" burial. There are laws on containers, treatment, and where the deceased can be buried. Dead bodies, while very biodegradable are also toxic and tend to get dug up and parts drug around by animals, up rooted by trees, or dug up during construction after the property is bought out. I do agree that funeral homes are soulless vultures who fleece people in mourning though, the last "fuck you" from capitalism.

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 11 points 8 months ago

I've looked it up years ago. In my state, you don't need embalmed, a vault, or anything really. You can throw a fresh body into the ground in a handmade pine box if you want.

I think the only restriction is an approved site for burial.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 10 points 8 months ago

What constitutes a natural burial? At a cursory glance there are only about 5 states that don’t permit home burials and many of those just say it has to be in a cemetery, but you can apply for a family cemetery on your property and it’s completely legal.

In Virginia and West Virginia at least there are no requirements whatsoever that you use a casket or bury them to any specific depth. I’d suspect that if you were disrespecting grandma and threw her in the garbage you would be breaking desecration of remains laws but doing a legitimate burial at home is completely fine.

I can only speak to the laws of my state and those around me, and I suppose local municipalities might have differing laws, but it’s pretty open ended. You do not need a funeral home involved at all and frankly given how expensive these things are I totally support families that go that route.

[-] rckclmbr@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I wish I could have a sky burial but I'm pretty sure theres nowhere in the US that could happen. And it would freak my wife out. I think the best option is aquamation (or hopefully recomposting since it was just legalized in california), since I can't have a sky burial

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

I’ve said the same thing for years. One day my wishes will be honored!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Are you sure natural burial is illegal?

[-] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yes and no, it's not a black and white issue. I didn't really want to go all in on the topic because it's Googleable. My grandpa recently passed and it's very expensive, we were looking for alternatives. On a federal level natural burial is allowed. The states take matters into their own hands. Some require burial vaults, some require embalming, some require that natural burials only happen in very specific places, and some require a mix of those things. It's doable but if they can squeeze money out of you through laws or extreme inconvenience, they will. It's not as easy and just picking a spot and burying a loved one, in a lot of cases.

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

First of all, sorry to hear what you're going through.

In regards to natural burial, my understanding is that it's more legal than not, just that there's regulations depending on where you live. It's very rare that embalming is required by law. Burial vaults are typically required when embalming fluids are used to slow the spread of the fluids to waterways. Neither of these are considered part of a natural burial.

There's a lot smoke and mirrors in the funeral industry that has led to wide misconceptions and outright misinformation. I asked if you were sure because the points you made are generally what a traditional burial funeral home would tell a client to steer them more towards their products. It's awful that it's become common for funeral homes to prey on those that are grieving. Absolutely despicable.

I hope y'all find a way that honors your grandpa without causing additional stress.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I’m not the guy that you’re responding too but I’ll add my anecdote.

There was a somewhat off his rocker dude in my hometown that lived with his mom, she died, he didn’t notify anyone, buried her on his land (owned 15-20 acres or so, nothing large) and didn’t tell anyone. A few months go by and she obviously misses doctor appointments, church, etc so police check in. Then the guy says “oh yeah she died, I buried her, no biggie”. Turns out he violated a few laws doing this so he got some light jail time, she got exhumed, investigated to make sure she wasn’t murdered, then buried in a graveyard.

I lived fairly close to all this being in the same county and learned that in Illinois at least, you can’t just bury your dead, you have to go through some processes.

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

That's right, there's is a process. You can't just bury people without reporting the death and going through some sort of process. That's a good bit different from an actual natural burial even if at face value he did bury her naturally lol. That's wild. I've heard of that happening in my region in the southern Appalachians too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

They are wrong. One of my family members works in the industry. Wood biodegradable caskets are perfectly legal in all states.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Are you out of your mind?

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 21 points 8 months ago

Fun fact. It’s completely legal and ok to take possession of your loved one, provided you are their legal next of kin, and you can effectively bury them yourselves. Find someone on Craigslist that can throw together a pine box and rent out an excavator for a weekend and you can bury grandma for a fraction of the cost.

I have loaded a corpse into the bed of a pickup truck. We have sat bodies upright in the back of a suburban. All of this is completely legal so long as you don’t cross state lines and even then you just need a permit.

Each state handles it differently but largely this is the same wherever you go.

Spend the 5k to 10k on a nice trip to Vegas, Grammy would have wanted it that way.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Is it legal to have a Viking funeral where you're set adrift in a longboat and someone fires a flaming arrow at it and it goes down on fire? Asking for a friend.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

No. Not an any state when I looked into it a decade ago

That being said, sometimes it's easier to ask forgiveness than permission, if you get me.

[-] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 5 points 8 months ago

My dad helped with a 'burial at sea' thing. I'm sure they had some sort of permit, because it was a real to-do with a big casket weighted down so it would sink and such. The story goes that the weights weren't enough to sink it, and the casket ended up being air tight, so they shot a few holes in it to let air out and water in. I'm pretty sure they did it in international waters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

Your friend is not the first to ask this xD

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

That’s actually a great question and I don’t know the answer. It might not be permitted because of concerns about disposing of remains and whatnot but again each state is different with their laws.

Personally I want a sky burial but I don’t think I’d be able to sell that to my family.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What happens if you don't own land?

Wait..You... You are saying to only bury your dead on your own land, right?

Padme_meme.jpg

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

If you don't own land then you're not a real citizen /s

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

It turns out that humans and their pets are horrible for the environment because we’re just filled with chemicals from medication, cosmetics, and food. We’re not living our natural best anymore.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

It's actually illegal in most countries to bury a dead body without alerting your authorities and usually there are restrictions on where you can do it.

You can of course just cremate the body, you don't have to go with a cemetery.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Embalming is optional and always has been. You can purchase biodegradable caskets and again that was always been an option. Open caskets are by family request and often aren't even an option.

I also saw Adam Ruins everything.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
370 points (97.0% liked)

News

21752 readers
3355 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS