this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
751 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 86 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Because democrats are willing to do their jobs.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And here I thought Democrats even participating in a BS, "bipartisan" bill that only served to validate the xenophobia being put forth by the opposing party was appalling and a clear example of the utter failure they represent.

Then again, illegals is common vernacular now, so what the fuck do I even know, really.

I've voted for Dems my entire life, but you'll never catch me saying they "do their jobs". The party embarrasses me at nearly every opportunity; any support I have for/give to the party is despite its leadership, not because of it.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Willing, and capable are different. They are politicians after all.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Rolling over for republicans is in their job description?!

... that explains a few things...

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When politics function correctly, that is what they are supposed to do in order to get concessions on other important things. Compromise leaves everyone unsatisfied.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Compromise is supposed to come with consessions from BOTH sides, not just handing one side everything they actually want after they make an unreasonable request...

That's capitulation, not negotiation.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's what the democrats were trying to do. Republicans tied funding for Ukraine and some other things to tightening border security. The democrats called their bluff. They said "Here's a border security bill that does what you've been asking for now let's get this all done". Republicans' made surprised Pikachu face and said "We didn't want it this way! We want it done by OUR president so he gets credit!" So, even though the Democrats were giving the Republicans what they've been asking for in exchange for things the Democrats wanted, the Republicans said "no".

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

Republicans never argue in good faith, and they always put power and politics over policy.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"That's what they were doing! Republicans made a dishonest and completely unneccessary move, and Democrats compromised with that unreasonable position!"

Yes... exactly. Democrats GIVE IN TO BAD FAITH DEMANDS. That is NOT negotiating. That is capitulating.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I don't think you really read my comment. Here's my summation of how the back and forth went:

Dems: We want funding for Ukraine.

Reps: We want border security. No funding for Ukraine without border security!

Dems: Okay! Let's do both!

Reps: Wait! We didn't really mean it!

The Dems called the Reps bluff and the Reps backed out. The Dems were getting something they wanted in the deal, too. Plus, Dems seem to be warming to the idea of border security more recently so they're not exactly getting nothing from that part either.

That doesn't sound like giving in to bad faith demands. That sounds like negotiating. It's just that the Reps aren't actually interested in negotiating and flipped the table over even though they were getting a pretty good deal. It shows the Reps as the selfish babies that they are while the Dems show willingness to actually get things done.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, but Republicans convincing you it is, is the primary requirement in a Republican's job description.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, they should do what the Republicans are doing and use a scorched earth, no compromise strategy! I mean, geez, look at all these huge legislative wins accomplished by this congress using this strategy. Maybe we can even have a cool purity-test driven speaker role, that's been working well for them! Anything else we should imitate that I'm forgetting? A demagogic, unrestrained president would definitely tie things up nicely.

Okay I'll stop being a sarcastic jerk now, but you get the point. This strategy from Republicans works wonders when it comes to obstructing and shutting things down, but you're never going to build anything with it. It's destructive at its core.

[–] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you think its a bad strategy for taking action that the people actually want?

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Sometimes, yep. A small handful of decades ago, "the people" would have wanted gay marriage banned forever. Before that, interracial marriage. Before that, women's suffrage. I want a system that enacts good, just law in a stable manner and while I always think democracy should be a part of any system I would be a part of, pure democracy has no effective way of ensuring minority rights.

That's answering your question in the abstract. For this situation specifically, of course I want democratic, progressive legislation passed. In fact, I want to maximize the amount of democratic progress over the longest period of time, to the point where I'm willing to take losses on smaller items for the bigger picture.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Notice how I am distinctly not asking for Democrats to become as obstructionist. I'm saying they should act like adults dealing with unreasonable people.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you act as if you have leverage you don't and refuse to engage with those who have power, your only choice is obstruction. This is what the Republicans are learning right this moment. Now, lucky for them, obstruction happens to coincide pretty well with their political objectives. For anything "constructive" though, they fail time and time again because none of them know how to compromise.

Politics is compromising with factions to achieve your goals. I loathe some of the things we have to compromise on, but these people exist and they will have representation in our government for as long as they do.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They do not deserve representatives that cannot uphold their oath of office just because they also think that way

We do not let murderers write the laws on murder, yet people CONSTANTLY excuse Congress for being illegally vile...

What the fuck is wrong with everyone? Neither party's behavior is acceptable REGARDLESS of how large the gulf between them is.

Note how I have never once said to not vote for dems over repubs. I just want people to realize you are not working with quality. You CANNOT expect dems to do the right thing on their own. Ever. They require constant pressure to the left, or they DO get dragged to the right.

This played out in real time and people EXCUSE the risk. The risk vs reward is pathetically small for gheir gamble. This was NOT a smart move even IF it worked out, and it's literal insanity to sit here and listen to buffoons defend a terrible decision that moves the Overton window to rhe right.

Yet again, people are cheering the Dems allowing the Overton window to slip to the right... Pathetic. Beyond pathetic. It will be the death of this country.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You talk about "acceptable" and "deserving" but you have to realize that power is the only thing that matters in the end. They get power, they enact their whims. They don't, they can't. Right now, they have it, so you have to negotiate. That's it, that's just how it works.

People who complain about the Overton window are wasting their time. You don't get to control that. Focus on winning what is possible with the window you have to work in. Expand that window if and when you can. Refusing to participate until the window looks like what you want it to is just ineffective.

And I just don't agree with your characterization of the dems. I have my problems with their direction or actions at times, but they've fought and won for my rights and for the rights of various others in my lifetime. I do consider the more leftist parts of the party to be allies, but I'm not willing to give complete credit for those victories to only that wing of the party. I think it's really disingenuous to look at the victories won for LGBT rights, climate change, and healthcare in the last 20 years (incomplete as they may be), and just write off the work done by democrats to achieve those.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, that's the thing... we DO control the Overton window. Demovrats could easily stand their ground and keep it somewhere. They choose not to.

How much leftist progress came about because of Bernie and AOC simply being a voice of the left??

This shit matters, and Democrats CONSTANTLY shirk responsibility.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Listen, spend your time shaking your fist at the democrats and ignoring the realities of politics all you like, but it's not pragmatic. Again, I have my complaints, but overall I'm pleased with the way that democrats have operated recently. AOC is even a Democrat! It's a big party with a lot of viewpoints, but has a throughline of empathy, minority rights, and democracy. There have been wins that have personally affected me in massive ways, almost entirely won by democrats.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Ignoring the reality of politics"

Ahh yes, you enlightened centrist, please tell me how CONSTANTLY letting dishonest actors be treated as if they are not dishonest helps anything?

The people denying reality are those like you. We NEED better than Democrats.

Stop creating excuses for them.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not much of a centrist really. I guess maybe on the global scale, but I'm a pretty average socdem. I'm not creating excuses for them at all. I'm mostly happy with what Democrats have accomplished and warded off for me and the country in my lifetime, so there's nothing for me to excuse. There's always room to grow and improve, for sure, but expecting perfection and my entire wishlist is ignoring those pesky real world obstacles again.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you're happy with the Dems, you're not paying attention. While global warming ramps up, they ask for a slow transition to NATURAL GAS. Democrats do that for all topics. They are feet draggers and excuse makers.

Yes, that's better than the cartoon villains of the Republicans... but if you're happy to be represented by useful idiots... you're not paying attention.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

For all your noble ideals, you and much of the left has accomplished so little to achieve them. I share almost all of your convictions, but I value the people who can turn those dreams into a realistic plan and actually achieve it. That's why democrats have won my right to marry others of my gender. Democrats have won my partner healthcare. You want more, but what have you ever actually won for me? I value your ideas, but you should stop hating your allies that spend blood, sweat, and tears getting what is feasible into reality. You can't just ignore that you have obstacles and foes in your way who are going to chip away at what we all can do.

At the end of the day, we could be so much more productive together, focused on being better. Support and encourage to push things in your direction. Say "yes, and let's do more!" instead of "no, you should be doing this". We have complex problems to solve and nothing but imperfect people to fix them.