this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
232 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The answer is no, the American political system cannot survive a high percentage of willful contrarianism. This is true because the mechanisms to change the system require support from those bad actors as well, and the popular vote can do very little to fix if.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I’m tired of this nihilist capitulation

Those bullies live in communities, and those communities have to tolerate it for it to wipe out America

We stood up to these assholes in the 30s we can do it now

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We stood up to these assholes in the 30s

But did we really? I read my history, and if not for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the US would have either not joined WW2, or would have joined on the side of Germany.

The first CIA director (Before the CIA was formed) was doing spy shit in Europe before the US joined the war, and was very friendly with Hitler's government. He reportedly cried actual tears when the US joined the was against Germany.

There were Nazi marches in the US in the 30s, but they weren't popular for one reason only. The US population didn't like that the Nazi ideology was German. The Homegrown Fascists were more popular. Especially the America First movement.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa. Next thing I bet you'll tell me that there was a fascist coup plot in the 1930s. At the exact same time as Hitler's beerhall putch or something. Hell I bet it would be something even more ridiculous than that. Like when it was found out instead of prosecuting and hanging all those involved. FDR the target of the plot would instead negotiate with fascist, I mean Republicans. To pass his new deal legislation in return for not going after them. And that at least of the implicated businessmen would go on to become a senator shortly after being caught. Ironically being the father and grandfather of two future presidents or something.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who was that Bushes grandfather?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It was ole grave robbing Prescott Bush.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

It's not capitulation, it's an acknowledgment that this is cancer, not a virus.

America is not under attack, it's suffering from actions of its own people. We can't keep pretending like Trump or his supporters are an aberration, they are a significant portion of this country, and if we cannot change them, or change how the system works without their agreement, then we're stuck like this for quite some time until some sort of generational or cultural shift happens.

It's not nihilism, it's seeing the state of the field and acknowledging what the actual problem is. The question then is what we do about it, and chiefly, how much time we have left to do something about it before the damage becomes irreparable.

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mitch McConnell won his seat with the help of the negative ads saying thr Incumbent wasn't doing his job and was absent from voting way too many times. Kentucky was solidly Democratic at that point.

Maybe some of these superpacs need to hammer that point home.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That was in 1985, when conservativism was on the rise, and even then, it was extremely close.

But frankly I doubt it would even work today, and definitely not in Kentucky. What ads could Democrats run that is more effective than the Fox News Kentuckians injects into their veins now? The country is pretty significantly different now when it comes to politics and campaigning, and the demographics of Kentucky have shifted too. Kentucky is solidly Trump country now

Just like Ohio has become. Sherrod Brown has an outstanding Congressional record, he's been well liked for many terms, and he's been able to straddle the gulf between being a (mostly) progressive Democrat in an increasingly red state. It's remarkable he won his seat back in 2018. He's been a terrific Senator, but to spite all that, his seat is in real jeopardy, and it's entirely because of the letter next to his name.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

Give it 6 years and it'll be the 30s again. The wheel weaves as the wheel wills.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Kind of a definitional issue, isn't it? We have to tolerate it under our political system, because that's how our political system works. Deciding not to tolerate it requires discarding or ignoring the rules of our political system. So whether it's them or us knifing it, the answer to the question is no, our political system won't survive, by definition.

(There's nothing particularly sacrosanct about it, so the important question is whether we can fundamentally change our political system without too much violence.)

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

Historically speaking, "without too much violence" has included a full-blown war.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Both of you seem to be correct, but dystopian.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That's just it: reality is a dystopia for most. Any accurate analysis will sound dystopic, because that's what it's describing.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We were unified in the 30’s and these assholes weren’t homegrown.

It’s a different climate now. We’re not prepared for it.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Read history again. Half the Nazi ideology came from the states. (not literally half, just speaking lazily) Nazis DEFINITELY weren't the only ones screeching about how the white man was superior...

It was just Reconstruction 2.0... The US failed to purge evil yet again. There's only one place a bigoted racist whos willing to violently enact their racism belongs, and it's not breathing. The US has failed time and again to deliver actual justice to a single soul.

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That is the part I really do not understand. History has shown time and time again that the people always win.

[–] pragmakist@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think what's happening in the US today rhymes hard on the fall of the Roman Republic.

And I'm sorry, but I don't think the people won back then.

I do agree. Overall humanity lost big time as many who resisted died and/or were enslaved, but in the long run society healed and we had another peaceful era. If the 4th Turning theory is correct this is just how it goes.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

There's no such thing as "the people" when the country is so divided.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you don't see an American and eventually global reset as a good thing, you're part of the problem.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How to tell everyone you live a sheltered, privileged life protected from starvation and strife. If you imagine a "global reset" as some nice, equality-bringing thing you're incredibly naive.