this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22274 readers
213 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

like I live in rural montana where most of the population is reactionary and racist and it is objectively less violently authoritarian here than nyc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regul@hexbear.net 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

those in charge of the MTA are deeply unserious about improving the system in any way

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The MTA is run as a real estate interest that happens to also have a transit system

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You did it, you just broke down almost EVERYTHING wrong with 21st century capitalism down to its bare essentials.

Look at McDonald's, it's not even a fast food company anymore it's a real estate company.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 19 points 8 months ago

Oh, that's actually the cleverest bit, what keeps the whole enterprise running smoothly.

Running a restaurant, even one with the presence of McDonald's, is just not a particularly great business model. Costs, food labor maintenance ect, are high and profit is on average slim, prone to wild fluctuations. The real money is made in being the source of the costs, providing produce and meat, machinery and rental space. So, for nearly all of the company's history, McDonald's Corporation®(MCD) just doesn't bother with the restaurant end of things. Franchisee is just corporate-speak for bag-holder. In exchange for the profits of doing restaurant, the owner assumes all the actual risk of the enterprise. If it fails, it's own their head. (MCD) will still be there to rent the building and deliver patties to the next schmuck. If it turns out the location just isn't feasible? Liquidate it! It's all loss minimization.

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bill Gates owns like more land than anyone.

Software man needs land?

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago

Don't suppose we can form a coalition with Georgists? While they're still capitalist, at least their capitalism is leagues more bearable.